Theme: Education

  • Jon Haidt is a “Kindly Messenger”, delivering a this information in sympathetic

    Jon Haidt is a “Kindly Messenger”, delivering a this information in sympathetic terms. You can learn from him. You can learn from those of us who deliver it in unsympathetic terms. Or from the consequences by the conflict you have created with your hyper-consumptive Privilege.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 14:05:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184107973695528960

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184107345774813184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 8) We are only equal in poverty. We are only prosperous in inequality. Because inequality is the product of defeating the red queen through genetic, institutional, economic, cultural, and normative capital investment in defeating the red queen in every one of those disciplines.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184107345774813184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 8) We are only equal in poverty. We are only prosperous in inequality. Because inequality is the product of defeating the red queen through genetic, institutional, economic, cultural, and normative capital investment in defeating the red queen in every one of those disciplines.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184107345774813184

  • HAIDT IS A KINDLY MESSENGER. LEARN FROM HIM OR LEARN FROM US UNKINDLY, OR FROM C

    https://standard.co.uk/lifestyle/books/jonathan-haidt-the-coddling-of-the-american-mind-a4261081.htmlJON HAIDT IS A KINDLY MESSENGER. LEARN FROM HIM OR LEARN FROM US UNKINDLY, OR FROM CONSEQUENCES.

    —“Here is my interview in @EveningStandard, with Katie Law. I talk about “moral backsliding” –the way some of the moral progress of the last 70 years is coming undone:

    https://standard.co.uk/lifestyle/books/jonathan-haidt-the-coddling-of-the-american-mind-a4261081.html “—Jonathan Haidt @JonHaidt

    1) NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.

    2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we can afford to transgress previous norms and traditions that preserved our common interests. Conversely, having SPENT DOWN all that accumulated capital, we now return to the historical mean: nations.

    3) The left is by demonstrated preference cognitively feminine: consumptive, reproductive, maternal, the right masculine: conservative, capital producing, paternal. And women resist tightening the belt more than men do. So you will continue to tighten your belt and resist it all.

    4) But cooperative necessity in social orders, like gravity in physical orders, is inescapable – and resistance is expected but ultimately futile. Your mistake is confusing PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And confusing OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.

    5) And we have no choice but to defeat genetic and economic red queens. Why? Demographics is destiny. Your hyperconsumption has expanded the world underclass, reversing thousands of years of human domestication (economic and political eugenics).

    6) And in doing so created scarcity of the very goods you seek to hyper-consume. Humans are not insulated from the laws of physics and our productivity, particularly by the consumption of hydrocarbons, not as the liberals presumed – infinite. Welcome to consequences you created.

    7) I don’t make errors. Don’t bother trying to refute it. Try to understand it. Belt Tightening will come either by the restoration of nationalism, capital accumulation, and economic and political eugenics or it will come from collapse.

    8) We are only equal in poverty. We are only prosperous in inequality. Because inequality is the product of defeating the red queen through genetic, institutional, economic, cultural, and normative capital investment in defeating the red queen in every one of those disciplines.

    9) Jon Haidt is a “Kindly Messenger”, delivering a this information in sympathetic terms. You can learn from him. You can learn from those of us who deliver it in unsympathetic terms. Or from the consequences by the conflict you have created with your hyper-consumptive Privilege.Updated Oct 15, 2019, 10:09 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 10:09:00 UTC

  • HAIDT IS A KINDLY MESSENGER. LEARN FROM HIM OR LEARN FROM US UNKINDLY, OR FROM C

    https://standard.co.uk/lifestyle/books/jonathan-haidt-the-coddling-of-the-american-mind-a4261081.htmlJON HAIDT IS A KINDLY MESSENGER. LEARN FROM HIM OR LEARN FROM US UNKINDLY, OR FROM CONSEQUENCES.

    —“Here is my interview in @EveningStandard, with Katie Law. I talk about “moral backsliding” –the way some of the moral progress of the last 70 years is coming undone:

    https://standard.co.uk/lifestyle/books/jonathan-haidt-the-coddling-of-the-american-mind-a4261081.html “—Jonathan Haidt @JonHaidt

    1) NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.

    2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we can afford to transgress previous norms and traditions that preserved our common interests. Conversely, having SPENT DOWN all that accumulated capital, we now return to the historical mean: nations.

    3) The left is by demonstrated preference cognitively feminine: consumptive, reproductive, maternal, the right masculine: conservative, capital producing, paternal. And women resist tightening the belt more than men do. So you will continue to tighten your belt and resist it all.

    4) But cooperative necessity in social orders, like gravity in physical orders, is inescapable – and resistance is expected but ultimately futile. Your mistake is confusing PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And confusing OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.

    5) And we have no choice but to defeat genetic and economic red queens. Why? Demographics is destiny. Your hyperconsumption has expanded the world underclass, reversing thousands of years of human domestication (economic and political eugenics).

    6) And in doing so created scarcity of the very goods you seek to hyper-consume. Humans are not insulated from the laws of physics and our productivity, particularly by the consumption of hydrocarbons, not as the liberals presumed – infinite. Welcome to consequences you created.

    7) I don’t make errors. Don’t bother trying to refute it. Try to understand it. Belt Tightening will come either by the restoration of nationalism, capital accumulation, and economic and political eugenics or it will come from collapse.

    8) We are only equal in poverty. We are only prosperous in inequality. Because inequality is the product of defeating the red queen through genetic, institutional, economic, cultural, and normative capital investment in defeating the red queen in every one of those disciplines.

    9) Jon Haidt is a “Kindly Messenger”, delivering a this information in sympathetic terms. You can learn from him. You can learn from those of us who deliver it in unsympathetic terms. Or from the consequences by the conflict you have created with your hyper-consumptive Privilege.Updated Oct 15, 2019, 10:08 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 10:08:00 UTC

  • READING (thanks Eric Bumpus) Available in our Library and Libgen. 2018 book. Exp

    https://www.amazon.com/Evolutionary-Psychopathology-Marco-Del-Giudice/dp/0190246847RECOMMENDED READING

    (thanks Eric Bumpus)

    Available in our Library and Libgen.

    2018 book. Expensive. Not popular. However, if combined with Baron Cohen’s books on autism and gender differences in brain you will sort of have the via positiva and via negativa understanding.

    https://www.amazon.com/Evolutionary-Psychopathology-Marco-Del-Giudice/dp/0190246847Updated Oct 14, 2019, 1:40 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 13:40:00 UTC

  • “I’ve done deep dives into feel-of-sophy… I’d say there are two useful areas t

    —“I’ve done deep dives into feel-of-sophy… I’d say there are two useful areas to explore which I’ve found indispensable… the history of the philosophy of science and the history of the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=483321428931419&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 23:20:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183160655865667584

  • ” might have done better by reading the summaries of the major philosophers firs

    —” might have done better by reading the summaries of the major philosophers first instead of going through their complete works one by one. Still, I’m going through them pretty fast.”—… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=483285215601707&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 21:47:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183137161455063041

  • WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE Let me put it in perspective

    WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE

    Let me put it in perspective, white people, our fairy tales, our myths, our religion, our education – we were brought up to rule. Ourselves, our families, our polities, our nations and the world. This is what the rest of the world cannot grasp, and what the underclasses cannot achieve. Our civilization evolved for the continuous production of agency – we were all brought up to be princes and princesses – to rule. An aristocracy of everyone capable of joining the aristocracy. and the paternal rule of those who are not.

    I have been complaining about the anglo seizure of power by the middle class, and the american attempt to create an aristocracy of everyone. But the western man has been trying to create an aristocracy of everyone since we first put horse to wheel.

    The problem is that loosened the requirements for the demonstration of agency – one’s ability to rule one’s self ,one’s family, on’s business, one’s polity, one’s nation.

    And we failed to create additional houses for the classes that did demonstrate ability as they evolved education and limited agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 21:02:00 UTC

  • ” might have done better by reading the summaries of the major philosophers firs

    —” might have done better by reading the summaries of the major philosophers first instead of going through their complete works one by one. Still, I’m going through them pretty fast.”— Martin Štěpán

    I don’t really recommend philosophy, but science and economics instead. That said, myself I just read the Encyclopedia of Philosophy. And most of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and I don’t know how many summaries of the works of philosophers before I ‘bothered’ with the source material. And even then, except for starting with aristotle and plato like everyone else, I worked backwards from the present to the past. Because it’s readily apparent from that process what’s worth reading and what’s drivel.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 17:47:00 UTC

  • OK you. You are f–cking AWESOME on stage. You need to teach this stuff. DAMMIT.

    OK you. You are f–cking AWESOME on stage.
    You need to teach this stuff. DAMMIT. Great work!!!!!
    @ThePomen


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 20:09:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181662873182986242

  • RT @Outsideness: On the origins of our current cultural calamity

    RT @Outsideness: On the origins of our current cultural calamity. https://heterodoxacademy.org/seizing-means-knowledge-production/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 03:49:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181053852998668295