Curt Doolittle

Theme: Education

  • RT @Outsideness: … This is what happens when the CIA takes over child rearing

    RT @Outsideness: … This is what happens when the CIA takes over child rearing.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 10:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188770861270097920

  • MOVEMENT: INTELLECTUAL > POLITICAL > AESTHETIC —“Which is the better tool to i

    MOVEMENT: INTELLECTUAL > POLITICAL > AESTHETIC

    —“Which is the better tool to introduce these concepts into academia? Political or intellectual forms? Or is that something you’re willing to allow to naturally occur?”— Jarrod Marma

    I think when we develop an aesthetic class it will make its way into academia. A movement needs aesthetic (empathic), political (utilitarian), and intellectual (conceptual-technological (Power)) assets.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 08:19:00 UTC

  • GROUP NATIONALISM IS ANOTHER FORM OF MINDFULNESS WE MUST PROVIDE IN EDUCATION —

    GROUP NATIONALISM IS ANOTHER FORM OF MINDFULNESS WE MUST PROVIDE IN EDUCATION

    —“What distinguishes China’s military training, apart from how cursory it is, is that it is blended into… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=493962517867310&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 16:15:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188489334091063297

  • YES, ANN COULTER SOUNDS LIKE JOHN MARK —“Sir: I watched an interview with Ann

    YES, ANN COULTER SOUNDS LIKE JOHN MARK

    —“Sir: I watched an interview with Ann Coulter just a minute ago and she sounds just like John Mark. … She needs to be recruited.” — Jim

    We are gently keeping Ann ‘informed’ through arms length contacts.

    We must work with her slowly, so that she is not tainted by association with our ‘working our way through libertarianism, alt right, hard right, traditional right, religious right, and into the mainstream’. We created a lot of ‘friction’ during research and development.

    We assume she will raise the ‘call to arms’ because she is the most positioned to do so.

    So, we want her to use our ideas for her benefit and our peoples’ benefit. But we do not want her to be directly associated with us until we finish our migration to the mainstream.

    We only want her to appropriate our ideas like we want all center left, center, center-right, libertarian, traditional right, christian right, and hard right to appropriate our ideas.

    In other words, we want to empower Ann and others, not empower ourselves. We don’t need attention. we don’t need recognition or appreciation. We need to produce results restoring western civilization.

    -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 14:59:00 UTC

  • GROUP NATIONALISM IS ANOTHER FORM OF MINDFULNESS WE MUST PROVIDE IN EDUCATION —

    GROUP NATIONALISM IS ANOTHER FORM OF MINDFULNESS WE MUST PROVIDE IN EDUCATION

    —“What distinguishes China’s military training, apart from how cursory it is, is that it is blended into students’ academic careers, rather than existing as a separate track of the Chinese education. As such, military training is central to the national education system and the state’s increasingly ambitious ideological goals.”—

    (Via Don Miguel)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 12:15:00 UTC

  • OF TOP 100 PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS?

    LIST OF TOP 100 PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS?

    (almost no wise men, only technicians)

    https://www.infoplease.com/prospectfp-top-100-public-intellectuals

    Updated Oct 26, 2019, 11:36 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 11:36:00 UTC

  • WHY DON”T WE TEACH MARXIST ECONOMICS EXCEPT IN SOCIOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY AND LITERAT

    WHY DON”T WE TEACH MARXIST ECONOMICS EXCEPT IN SOCIOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE?

    —“No one teaches Marxism in economics….” vitiates any merits there may be to your rather prosaic submission 🤔”— Jason Tutu

    Find me some university economics department that teaches marxist economics. They may teach a touch of marx in the history of economic thought. They don’t teach it at all. IN fact I don’t know any economics department that teaches anything other than mainstream (keynesian, saltwater) thought, albeit with some nod to chicago and at least in the best, some nod to austrian (mengerian). That’s because the labor theory of value is clearly false, economic calculation and coordination is impossible, and incentives are impossible, and every attempt at marxism whether fast failure (communism), medium failure (authoritarian socialism), or slow failure (democratic socialism) has failed, for not just one of the three reasons, but for ALL three reasons. And it cannot be otherwise. Why? Because in the end it violates the laws of physics, violates human moral intuition, which is bound by the laws of physics and therefore reflects them, and because there are limits to the debt-credit of human intuition and memory that make it possible for us to shift time between us so that we can obtain the outsized returns on cooperation, within those laws of physics.

    There are few people on this planet whounderstandd these subjects as well as I do and if you manage to capture the attention of one of us and actually respond to you, its wise counsel to read and understand what is being said to you.

    I do this for a living online because the public functions not just as my classroom but because of my method by teaching using king of the hill games, the public also serves as my test subjects.

    Affections.

    Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 11:30:00 UTC

  • WHY IS CURT GOING EASY ON RELIGION NOW? The reason I’m more accommodating lately

    WHY IS CURT GOING EASY ON RELIGION NOW?

    The reason I’m more accommodating lately is because my work on investigating religion, education, and government is done, it’s just a matter of updating the constitution, switching our daily discourse to advocacy of that constitution and it’s solutions. I’m sorry having your sacred cows questioned so aggressively (prosecutorally) whether theological, philosophical, sophomoric, normative, or pseudoscientific was painful – but that’s what prosecutors do: falsify everything possible so that only the truth remains. Once the truth is understood, then we can search for compromises while motioning the truth between us. This is what we all need, and it’s a condition we all prefer, but we are always trying to ‘get a better deal by hook or by crook’ and sorry – everything is a reciprocal exchange.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 11:33:00 UTC

  • THE MOST IMPORTANT LESSON FROM THE CHURCH EXPERIENCE The most important lesson I

    THE MOST IMPORTANT LESSON FROM THE CHURCH EXPERIENCE

    The most important lesson I’ve observed, and perhaps the most important, is that sitting still in church, and the social pressure of sitting still in church, no matter how hard it is, teaches us the meaning of ‘sacred’ which is ‘we have no rights of self fulfillment’.

    I think it is underrated, how much the respect we demonstrate for one another in religious ceremony translates to how we ALWAYS act in the commons – and I think the loss of this ‘sacredness’ and this training in the ‘submission’ by develops ‘agency’ over impulses such that we do not impose so many costs of self expression (hyper-consumption) on the commons and therefore the polity.

    You do know what group did this right? What one group undermined it? I do.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 10:02:00 UTC

  • Excellence doesn’t scale. Sorry. You can’t teach it. Excellent people are the pr

    Excellence doesn’t scale.
    Sorry.
    You can’t teach it.
    Excellent people are the primary bottleneck.
    The only solution is to constrain the bottom so that excellence isn’t overloaded (peter principle)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 16:04:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187399425922129923