Curt Doolittle

Theme: Demonstrated Interests

  • 2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we

    2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we can afford to transgress previous norms and traditions that preserved our common interests. Conversely, having SPENT DOWN all that accumulated capital, we now return to the historical mean: nations.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:53:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184104907894378497

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864

  • So not only are your fantasies indistinguishable from lying, it’s pretty settled

    So not only are your fantasies indistinguishable from lying, it’s pretty settled science that what people report they believe is rarely demonstrated in their actions – particularly if it impinges upon their self image. Hence the increasingly poor quality of polls.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 00:51:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179921979014549505

    Reply addressees: @freedomismoral

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179921646041403397

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @freedomismoral But in matters of argument, competition, conflict, or ir-reciprocity(criminal, unethical, immoral) your imagination makes no difference. Lying to yourself makes no difference. Lying to preserve a delusion makes no difference. Only action does. And actions demonstrate truth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179921646041403397

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @freedomismoral But in matters of argument, competition, conflict, or ir-reciprocity(criminal, unethical, immoral) your imagination makes no difference. Lying to yourself makes no difference. Lying to preserve a delusion makes no difference. Only action does. And actions demonstrate truth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179921646041403397

  • Evidence is evidence, and without warranty, humans report the opposite of their

    Evidence is evidence, and without warranty, humans report the opposite of their demonstrated preference just to maintain self image or status with others. Constantly. So we have no idea what fantasies you imagine and it’s not clear you do either – until you demonstrate such.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 00:47:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179921024558735360

    Reply addressees: @freedomismoral

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179920475046268928

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @freedomismoral Well courts do so every day in governance of human actions. You cannot make a truth claim about that which you cannot Testify. It’s simply not possible. You can find meaning, utility, satisfaction, sedation, you can find faith, but without demonstration you don’t know either.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179920475046268928

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @freedomismoral Well courts do so every day in governance of human actions. You cannot make a truth claim about that which you cannot Testify. It’s simply not possible. You can find meaning, utility, satisfaction, sedation, you can find faith, but without demonstration you don’t know either.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179920475046268928

  • Economics of Consumption Is by Definition Leftist

    [S]overeignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them. To reinforce the intuition that productivity isn’t observable with a bit more edge: westerners produce commons that other people cannot produce, and we do by NOT DOING evil: lying, misleading, cheating, stealing, free riding, corruption, as much as what we DO: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Heroism. So economists (all of whom are leftists) only measure individual consumer goods, not the production of commons: truth, honesty, integrity, contract, quality, civility, responsibility – which is what makes western civilization unique. We don’t live in a world where there is a problem of consumption – we have just enabled the world to stampede on a path to hyper-consumption – even of the commons we alone can make, which made their hyper-consumption possible.

  • Economics of Consumption Is by Definition Leftist

    [S]overeignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them. To reinforce the intuition that productivity isn’t observable with a bit more edge: westerners produce commons that other people cannot produce, and we do by NOT DOING evil: lying, misleading, cheating, stealing, free riding, corruption, as much as what we DO: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Heroism. So economists (all of whom are leftists) only measure individual consumer goods, not the production of commons: truth, honesty, integrity, contract, quality, civility, responsibility – which is what makes western civilization unique. We don’t live in a world where there is a problem of consumption – we have just enabled the world to stampede on a path to hyper-consumption – even of the commons we alone can make, which made their hyper-consumption possible.

  • Well done. Follower just made me aware of you. Sovereignty demands Reciprocity,

    Well done. Follower just made me aware of you.
    Sovereignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 16:19:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178343649421271041

    Reply addressees: @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178340761764544515

    IN REPLY TO:

    @HarmlessYardDog

    @trutsle My intention was to show that sovereignty in all aspects (economic, cultural and spiritual) is necessary, otherwise the soul crushing circumstances pictured in my tweet will become the norm.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178340761764544515

  • ECONOMICS OF CONSUMPTION IS BY DEFINITION LEFTIST Sovereignty demands Reciprocit

    ECONOMICS OF CONSUMPTION IS BY DEFINITION LEFTIST

    Sovereignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them.

    To reinforce the intuition that productivity isn’t observable with a bit more edge: westerners produce commons that other people cannot produce, and we do by NOT DOING evil: lying, misleading, cheating, stealing, free riding, corruption, as much as what we DO: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Heroism.

    So economists (all of whom are leftists) only measure individual consumer goods, not the production of commons: truth, honesty, integrity, contract, quality, civility, responsibility – which is what makes western civilization unique.

    We don’t live in a world where there is a problem of consumption – we have just enabled the world to stampede on a path to hyper-consumption – even of the commons we alone can make, which made their hyper-consumption possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 12:26:00 UTC

  • THIS IS THE LAW. The only possible sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and prosperity

    THIS IS THE LAW.

    The only possible sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and prosperity is created by men willing to insure each other against all threats to the demonstrated interests of each other and the only way to do that is by rule of law of reciprocity and universal warranty of due diligence in its defense.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 14:31:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism. Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity. The only possibl

    Propertarianism. Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity. The only possible source of sovereignty, liberty, and freedom: reciprocal insurance of everyone’s demonstrated interests (property) by every man able bodied man, producing sufficient commons to deny all alternatives.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 02:09:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177767217808707586

    Reply addressees: @DisdainforReds @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177734801572470787

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DisdainforReds

    @jeffreytucker What how

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177734801572470787

  • Really? How would you test that by demonstrated action? Which is evident in the

    Really? How would you test that by demonstrated action? Which is evident in the society? Religious symbolism, or commercial symbolism? Is it solstice, yule, Santa Claus’ day or a christian holiday?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-26 11:38:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177185630100557825

    Reply addressees: @Communism_Kills

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177183465869074435

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177183465869074435