Sorry Hans Hoppe, but you started from a false premise. Sovereignty and Reciprocity over all demonstrated interests are the only reason not to kill, enslave, enserf, plunder, or otherwise profit from by predation or parasitism. Justificationism is always false – see Abrahamism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-16 00:19:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195496543048151040
And how has that trust served your interests so far?
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-15 00:10:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195131853876936704
Reply addressees: @KurtKurtking @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195115173947871232
IN REPLY TO:
@KurtKurtking
@JohnMarkSays @curtdoolittle An unelected king as final arbiter? Never! They have been corrupted by unelected advisors. I trust Judicial review of laws and impeachment of judges.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195115173947871232
It does not matter what you say, what you say you believe, only what you demonstrate as evidence. Marx was just another abrahamist using the abrahamic method of undermining by making unwarrantable untestable false promises to the dim and ignorant, to construct undermine a host.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 00:38:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191515147157852160
Reply addressees: @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191514861844475904
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge Marx was an abrahamist, using the Abrahamic method of deceit: undermining a host population, by false promise, baiting the ignorant into hazard, using the fictionalisms of supernaturalism-occult, idealism-surrealism pseudsocience-magic, pilpul(sophism) and Critique(straw manning)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191514861844475904
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge Marx was an abrahamist, using the Abrahamic method of deceit: undermining a host population, by false promise, baiting the ignorant into hazard, using the fictionalisms of supernaturalism-occult, idealism-surrealism pseudsocience-magic, pilpul(sophism) and Critique(straw manning)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191514861844475904
DEMONSTRATE INVESTMENT FIRST BEFORE OBTAINING INFLUENCE
—“It was universal suffrage males who gave women the vote, and in 1932, it was men who supported FDR over Hoover (who women supported more). Voting used to be granted as a reward for responsibilities, as a consequence of it. Own land, pay taxes and part of the militia who keeps the country free against enemies foreign/domestic? You get to vote because of those responsibilities. Emphasis on voting as a reward for responsibilities solves the voting problem without the collateral damage.”—Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:49:00 UTC
“Infringe” in P-law = “Imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others, whether demonstration by action or inaction, in seizure of opportunity, articulated as Property-in-Toto as enumerated herein.” There is nowhere to go. Even misrepresenting it’s a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 14:01:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189542904768786434
Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189517212664713218
IN REPLY TO:
@viralstrikeai
@curtdoolittle The left has issues with context and reading simple words like “infringed” we have the same issues.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189517212664713218
I wouldn’t know how to ‘test’ secret society membership. I think all of it’s pretty much conspiracy theory – I mean religions? I would say instead that all organizations pursuing irreciprocity are by definition criminal, and criminals cannot sit The Jury of any House.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 15:57:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188122526406324224
Reply addressees: @KurtKurtking @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188121840700526592
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KurtKurtking @JohnMarkSays Caution: P-Law only tests for reciprocity. But,our proposed US constitution’s Prohibitions are: Lawyers, Govt., Immigrants w/o 6 generations, and Foreign Nationals; restores houses for the classes and genders; and requires demonstrated achievement in military, family, biz.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188121840700526592
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KurtKurtking @JohnMarkSays Caution: P-Law only tests for reciprocity. But,our proposed US constitution’s Prohibitions are: Lawyers, Govt., Immigrants w/o 6 generations, and Foreign Nationals; restores houses for the classes and genders; and requires demonstrated achievement in military, family, biz.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188121840700526592
Reciprocity: Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated interests of the others by externality. This describes all property possible, not just intersubjectively verifiable, or subjective.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:36:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187513124183777281
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@NSKinsella I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@NSKinsella I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527
Libertarianism is a sedating pseudo-moral sophism for those to ignorant, weak and cowardly, to organise militarily to create rule of law by reciprocity,under demonstrated interests, enumerated as property, and to insure it equally, producing a condition of sovereignty. Liars all.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 21:58:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187488641469288454
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187441168214380544
IN REPLY TO:
@NSKinsella
I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast. I know it would be poplar. And I don’t even want to make money. So no ads. But then, why bother. Nevermind.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187441168214380544
THE ONLY TEST IS DEMONSTRATED BEHAVIOR
—“Values testing to become a citizen of P-topia?”—Andrew M Gilmour
The Propertarian Institute We don’t need to do anything except create a law,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491326738130888&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 21:37:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187120775393873920
PEOPLE CHOSE THEIR SELF INTEREST – ONE CREATED FOR THEM TO CHOOSE, BUT WHICH WAS SUICIDAL
—“… so People figured out the game was a losing battle & decided to withdraw from society &… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491296481467247&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:33:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187104895775772674