Theme: Demonstrated Interests

LIBERTARIANS MADE GREAT USEFUL IDIOTS

—“Patent nonsense. Genetics is the most fundamental element of private property and inheritance.”—Jonathan Besler

Resource Free of Demonstrated interest.

Desired Interest (not property)

Demonstrated Interest (not property)

Possession (non property)

Consensual (reciprocally Insured proto Property

Normatively Insured (social Property)

Institutionally Insured (political Property)

… Political Property:

… … Private Property (monopoly of control)

… … Private Common Property (unenumerated interest)

… … Shareholder Property (enumerated interest)

… … Franchised Common Property (unenumerated interest)

One can demonstrate interest in children (create and maintain them)

One can demonstrate possession of children by force, by convention, by institution)

Property – meaning insured, possession, of demonstrated interest – on the other hand, is a consensual, normative, or political category because it is insured by others. If you possess it, and it’s not insured, it’s not property. That’s what property means: that which is insured by other parties. And good luck with rational operational and empirical evidence to the contrary.

So you are confusing demonstrated interest with factional possession, and factual insurance, and factual terms of insurance.

Which is why libertarianism succeeded the way marxism and abrahamic religion succeeded = by taking advantage of ignorance of people using conflationary terms, to create the presumption of logic where there is none.

Libertarians shouldn’t feel too bad about being useful idiots for the enemy. But they were and are. But the authors of libertarianism come from a long tradition of deception by false promise, baiting into hazard, sophism, and critique, ad profiting from doing so.

There is only one source of sovereignty and that is the reciprocal insurance of reciprocity by all men capable of bearing arms. Everything else is lying.