The reason I stick so rigidly with the computational model and existential (material) model is to close the door completely to abrahamism(jewish), rationalization(french) and phenomenalism(german) as means of self deception. The computational and material model explains the phenomenological. With it we can discuss the phenomenological without attributing CAUSATION TO IT. Our experiential world is the result of the physical and computational. Most philosophical and argumentative systems measure the experiential rather than merely observe that the experiential is a measurement (consequence) of the material and computational.
Theme: Decidability
-
Why Do You Constrain Argument to The Material and Computational?
The reason I stick so rigidly with the computational model and existential (material) model is to close the door completely to abrahamism(jewish), rationalization(french) and phenomenalism(german) as means of self deception. The computational and material model explains the phenomenological. With it we can discuss the phenomenological without attributing CAUSATION TO IT. Our experiential world is the result of the physical and computational. Most philosophical and argumentative systems measure the experiential rather than merely observe that the experiential is a measurement (consequence) of the material and computational.
-
WHY DO YOU CONSTRAIN ARGUMENT TO THE MATERIAL AND COMPUTATIONAL? The reason I st
WHY DO YOU CONSTRAIN ARGUMENT TO THE MATERIAL AND COMPUTATIONAL?
The reason I stick so rigidly with the computational model and existential (material) model is to close the door completely to abrahamism(jewish), rationalization(french) and phenomenalism(german) as means of self deception.
The computational and material model explains the phenomenological. With it we can discuss the phenomenological without attributing CAUSATION TO IT.
Our experiential world is the result of the physical and computational.
Most philosophical and argumentative systems measure the experiential rather than merely observe that the experiential is a measurement (consequence) of the material and computational.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 10:12:00 UTC
-
Extending Eli’s Necessity of Commensurability and Decidability
Long (Established Male), medium (ascendent male), short term (female consumption) division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy demand different degrees of calculation – computational stress. This is why trust, reciprocity, norms, traditions, myths, institutions and laws matter most to those of us with conservative and long term values (intuitions/genes) and not to those with progressive and short term values (intuitions/genes). Physical stress, lower emotional stress, higher intellectual stress and more accumulated cellular damage. (Male) -vs_ Physical stress, higher emotional stress, lower intellectual stress, and less accumulated cellular damage (Female) —“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman -
Extending Eli’s Necessity of Commensurability and Decidability
Long (Established Male), medium (ascendent male), short term (female consumption) division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy demand different degrees of calculation – computational stress. This is why trust, reciprocity, norms, traditions, myths, institutions and laws matter most to those of us with conservative and long term values (intuitions/genes) and not to those with progressive and short term values (intuitions/genes). Physical stress, lower emotional stress, higher intellectual stress and more accumulated cellular damage. (Male) -vs_ Physical stress, higher emotional stress, lower intellectual stress, and less accumulated cellular damage (Female) —“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman -
Commensurability and decidability between individuals
—“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman Eli hitting it out of the park on that one.
-
Commensurability and decidability between individuals
—“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman Eli hitting it out of the park on that one.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. EXTENDING ELI’S NECESSITY OF COMMENSURABILITY
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
EXTENDING ELI’S NECESSITY OF COMMENSURABILITY AND DECIDABILITY
Long (Established Male), medium (ascendent male), short term (female consumption) division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy demand different degrees of calculation – computational stress.
This is why trust, reciprocity, norms, traditions, myths, institutions and laws matter most to those of us with conservative and long term values (intuitions/genes) and not to those with progressive and short term values (intuitions/genes).
Physical stress, lower emotional stress, higher intellectual stress and more accumulated cellular damage. (Male)
-vs_
Physical stress, higher emotional stress, lower intellectual stress, and less accumulated cellular damage (Female)
—“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 21:35:28 UTC
-
EXTENDING ELI’S NECESSITY OF COMMENSURABILITY AND DECIDABILITY Long (Established
EXTENDING ELI’S NECESSITY OF COMMENSURABILITY AND DECIDABILITY
Long (Established Male), medium (ascendent male), short term (female consumption) division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy demand different degrees of calculation – computational stress.
This is why trust, reciprocity, norms, traditions, myths, institutions and laws matter most to those of us with conservative and long term values (intuitions/genes) and not to those with progressive and short term values (intuitions/genes).
Physical stress, lower emotional stress, higher intellectual stress and more accumulated cellular damage. (Male)
-vs_
Physical stress, higher emotional stress, lower intellectual stress, and less accumulated cellular damage (Female)
—“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 17:35:00 UTC
-
Anarcho – *(Rothbard, Hoppe) = at best, discretionary poly-logical, market law.
Anarcho – *(Rothbard, Hoppe) = at best, discretionary poly-logical, market law. And therefore is limited to defense of intersubjectively verifiable property; since law can only form as such at the minimum tolerable scope of application.
Just as the church majority parasites then, the state parasites, left parasites, and immigrant parasites, in group feminists, and in group libertines today and the abrahamists in all their forms, more people always want to preserve their means of cheating (parasitism) than want to suppress them – despite all evidence that the forgone parasitisms produce multiples of returns far beyond their individual abilities to produce such returns.
This is why Anarchism cannot survive – because as the complexity of cooperation increases to produce higher returns, individuals and groups must exit in order to find insurers (governments) that permit the more productive, higher risk, means of production.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 10:54:00 UTC