Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • The Left “debate” Strategy Isn’t to Debate

    [D]uplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy. The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits. Left Wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique. Right wing = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”. The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency. It’s that simple.

  • Why? Why Are We Winning? We Are No Longer Hopeful that The Rest Can Be Made Honorable

    1) Their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we weren’t aware 2) Then their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we we didn’t stop and punish them 3) Then their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we didn’t deceive them back. 4) Now we are – and they are crumbling Winning is fun. We are no longer converting, but conquering.

  • James on “honor (gloating) in Deceit”

    [R]egarding “honor-in-deceit”, let’s tease this out because it is beyond that. If you remember Japanese, say during WWII, only cowards surrender. I true warrior would rather die in battle or by suicide (not agreeing with that, just observing). So here we have not just “honor-in-deceit” but “mocking, and gloating”, so that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon. Then if you simply close the doors and say never again they come back, please please or you are racist! to let them in. Then you will get punked again and they laugh and mock you. Let’s Repeat That:

    —“It’s not just honor-in-deceit, but a mocking, and gloating, that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon.”—

    They POISON the MORAL WELL, and leave only the option for physical retaliation. Which is precisely what HONOR REQUIRES (duty, cost of maintaining the commons). If we argue and disagree we can separate. If we argue and insult we must punish. That is the only way to preserve the moral and informational commons.

  • Their Method of Argument…

    [I] have (((Their))) Method of Argument down in form. James has it down in stages of argument and counter-argument. We just need to educate everyone on it. Then we need to educate everyone that the only reason to NOT engage in ‘warfare’ and instead in debate, is if we are actually debating in order to determine a trade when we don’t agree, or a good, when we do. Then we need to engage in ‘War’ often enough that we suppress the ‘poisoning of the well’.

  • The Left “debate” Strategy Isn’t to Debate

    [D]uplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy. The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits. Left Wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique. Right wing = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”. The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency. It’s that simple.

  • Why? Why Are We Winning? We Are No Longer Hopeful that The Rest Can Be Made Honorable

    1) Their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we weren’t aware 2) Then their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we we didn’t stop and punish them 3) Then their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we didn’t deceive them back. 4) Now we are – and they are crumbling Winning is fun. We are no longer converting, but conquering.

  • A god of lies. who gave us the dark ages. muslim conquest. and the destruction o

    —A god of lies. who gave us the dark ages. muslim conquest. and the destruction of every civilization of the ancient world. You don’t understand. Jehovah is a demon and his worshippers are his fools.—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 18:03:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059144080855392256

  • ( Ok. So findings come out and Ford is the quick and easy chick at parties and n

    ( Ok. So findings come out and Ford is the quick and easy chick at parties and nobody buys Kavanaugh did anything. ie: media circus all made it all up. Typical left nonsense. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 17:47:00 UTC

  • Elizabeth is just using a tragedy for self promotion. It is what people do when

    Elizabeth is just using a tragedy for self promotion. It is what people do when they have no value to add to humanity. THEY ENGAGE IN GOSSIP in order to get attention. Academic GOSSIP is still GOSSIP. And we treat it as such. END FAKE NEWS, UNFUND PSEUDOSCIENCE.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 16:42:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059123657581174784

    Reply addressees: @Elizrael

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059096495666982912

    IN REPLY TO:

    @LizHurra

    Is this a joke? 5.4% of all Gab posts were found to contain hate speech. Remove neo-Nazis from your platform. You can keep the dove. https://t.co/qvjQojf2kg (link to pdf of study) https://t.co/YB3bSVlwHo

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059096495666982912

  • You see, each one of these flaccid attempts merely provides us with examples wit

    You see, each one of these flaccid attempts merely provides us with examples with which to train our followers. Because you don’t understand. The moment you speak we can identify you. You can’t help yourself. The fear drives you. Fear of alphas. Evolution doing its work.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 15:32:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059106239119003648

    Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED @PopChassid

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059100060301037569

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059100060301037569