Theme: Deception

  • Sabine Hossenfelder Fixes Physics 😉 (A woman in science that really, really, ma

    Sabine Hossenfelder Fixes Physics 😉
    (A woman in science that really, really, matters.)

    The first physicist to explain what’s wrong with physics, our understanding of it, and why, and largely what to do about it.
    Please have a watch, It’s worth it. Simple, clear, and direct as she always is.

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=B7Pc0LQHu38…

    I my own work I came to the same conclusion but I can’t warranty it as other than a logical analysis of how humans engage in ignorance error bias and deceit – even for the best of reasons. Since I spend so much time cataloging human error I tend to see it whenever its present.
    In physics that error is what we call ‘mathiness’ in economics, idealism in philosophy, and the confusion that Einstein was describing light and perception not physical bodies independent of them in our general interpretation.
    Now if we can just get to the point where space is a medium, and that there is at least one or two layers beyond the quantum background (that medium) and figure out how to conduct experiments with it, then we might get somewhere. 😉

    Thanks to Sabine for her work.
    The value of the german mind at work. 😉

    cc:
    @skdh


    Source date (UTC): 2026-03-21 13:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2035347953444102197

  • THE REAL DAMAGE THE LEFT ACHIEVED THROUGH EMPATHY RATHER THAN TRUTH We used to b

    THE REAL DAMAGE THE LEFT ACHIEVED THROUGH EMPATHY RATHER THAN TRUTH
    We used to be humble. The left intentionally trained generations to assert false confidence in justification of their intuitions rather than skepticism of them, and testimony under that skepticism, in order to undermine our ancient traditions of self regulation, self skepticism, and humility in order to weaponize the arrogance and ignorance of the inexperienced against the polity to generate demand for the left’s authority, and the gradual erasure of our traditions values institutions morals and norms.


    Source date (UTC): 2026-03-14 16:51:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2032862245903028691

  • The Manipulated Man Book by Esther Vilar The Manipulated Man is a controversial

    The Manipulated Man
    Book by Esther Vilar
    The Manipulated Man is a controversial 1971 book by Esther Vilar that argues women are not oppressed but instead manipulate men through sex, emotional blackmail, and traditional roles to secure provision and a comfortable life, with men being the ones who are truly controlled. Vilar claims women use praise, sex, and emotional displays to control men, who work and provide while women consume and languish, and that men must recognize this manipulation to achieve true equality. The book, originally written in German, became a bestseller and sparked significant debate, with Vilar maintaining that little has changed since its publication.

    Core arguments
    Manipulation, not oppression: Vilar’s central thesis is that women are not victims but are in control, using subtle and overt tactics to manipulate men.
    Tools of manipulation: She identifies praise, sex, and emotional blackmail (dramatized emotional reactions) as key tools women use to control men.
    Gender roles: The book posits that men work and think, while women consume and languish, with women choosing to let men provide for them in exchange for sex and praise.
    Marriage as a trap: Vilar argues that marriage is a trap for men, coerced by women under the guise of romance, and that men gain little from it.

    Reception and intent
    Controversial:The book was a sensation and earned Vilar severe criticism, but she intended it as a call for honesty between the sexes, not misogyny.
    A call to action:Vilar concludes that men must recognize and openly criticize this dynamic for real change to occur, as women are unlikely to give up their advantageous position.

    Video:

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=sCnc0qUsZTI…Book:
    https://barnesandnoble.com/w/the-manipulated-man-esther-vilar/1100086897?ean=2940162447894…


    Source date (UTC): 2026-03-14 13:50:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2032816566031859777

  • Anthony: By now you know how I work, which can postulate arguments I agree with

    Anthony:
    By now you know how I work, which can postulate arguments I agree with on the one hand, and bait for criticism to learn from on the other. And sometimes like in this case a mixture of seriousness and nonsense that baits both sides.
    It should not be difficult for you to determine which of those I am doing at any one time.
    However, if I stated what I was doing the utility of it would vanish and my incentive to use social media as a research vehicle with it. So in that sense the ‘confusion’ you experience is a desirable outcome. As was your criticism. 😉
    So “keep ’em guessing’ is a useful tool. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2026-03-08 19:18:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2030724745541619845

  • “The mirror always lies” (Apt lyrics for present age of socio political self des

    “The mirror always lies”
    (Apt lyrics for present age of socio political self destruction: overconfidence in ignorance.)

    Man before the mirror checks his camouflage.
    Polishes his armor, and the charger in the garage.
    Woman before the mirror, appraises her disguise.
    Girl become a woman, she tries to fix her eyes.

    Men and Women together
    Mistake conceit for pride
    Ambition for illusion
    Dreams for self-delusion

    All puffed up with vanity
    We see what we want to see
    To the beautiful and the wise
    The mirror always lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2026-03-03 23:30:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028976435231375856

  • (Thoughts) “Dying a little Inside.” I follow the intersexual conflict, just like

    (Thoughts)
    “Dying a little Inside.”

    I follow the intersexual conflict, just like I follow ideological, institutional, political, and international conflict.

    Fundamentally my work in decidability is a subconscious desire to end ignorance, error, delusion, bias, deceit and fraud so that we can cooperate on truthful reciprocal terms. Because I don’t like conflict. Especially dishonest conflict. I’m only good at it because I hate it, and that’s the only way to overcome it.

    I was just listening to a chat. My takeaway was that something died inside with every tragedy I experienced. Divorce, Illness, the immorality of the financial sector, the injustices done to my people by activism’s utopian abuse of the empirical common law. My own government coming after me when it was to blame, and my government coming after me more so when I sought to correct it – what Shakespeare meant with:

    — “For Who Would Bear The Proud Man’s Contumely (insult), the Pangs of Despised Love (Divorce), the Laws Delay (Courts), the Insolence of Office (Government), the Spurns that Patient Merit (tolerance) of The Unworthy (immoral) Takes. … who would these fardels (bundle of burdens) bear … ?” —

    All true. He closes with:

    “Conscience does make cowards of us all”.

    But this isn’t quite true. For some of us, we may die a little inside with every injustice and hurt. But some of us are not whittled away to resignation but spurred further to reverse the injustices – at any effort and at any cost.

    If maturity consists in our love of nature, life, and mankind, and our optimism and tolerance dying a bit at a time, then perhaps we have set about producing the wrong conditions of maturity.

    I have learned perhaps too much in my life, and spent the past years seeking solutions to the mounting crisis – but I’m no different from others who in similar phases of their civilizations have sought to capture practiced wisdom lost in an attempt to restore it – only to have it help the next iteration of civilization.

    The lesson of this century is one I have no promise of correction nor hope of retention: the female intuition is as destructive to the polity when unleashed as the male is destructive to the society when unleashed. Male violence has no place in the family and society and female irresponsibility and sedition no place in economics and politics.

    I prefer my women on a pedestal. But they have destroyed the illusion men have used to sculpt it. And I do not see a positive solution other than open recognition and embodiment in law.

    A little bit more dying inside.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2026-02-24 20:42:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2026397421211897890

  • Our Sr Fellow Luke Wenhagen at his best: –“As a population’s capacity for respo

    Our Sr Fellow Luke Wenhagen at his best:

    –“As a population’s capacity for responsibility declines, the activist gains a corresponding increase in their ability to manipulate the “reasonable person test” that is essential to adjudication.
    The “reasonable person test” serves as the structural forbearance that allows law, through the responsible officers of the court, the flexibility (judgment) to navigate adjudication and render a decision.
    As the “reasonable person test” gets manipulated via activism, reasonable becomes defined “in relation to the narrative” instead of “in relation to responsibility.”–

    Brilliant.

    cc:
    @LukeWeinhagen


    Source date (UTC): 2026-02-15 01:57:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022852777119277155

  • (Most of the problem in adjudication of cases is the detection of truth/deceptio

    (Most of the problem in adjudication of cases is the detection of truth/deception/falsehood and exposing the incentives of the humans involved. Judges have gone downhill since the seventies in particular because of leftist activism penetrating the universities. The judges and lawyers are no longer officers of the court, preserving the cooperation of the population within the state and its natural law, legislation and regulation, but activists trying to undermine the constitution and our laws because of the dozen or so holes in it. (Holes our organization fills). )


    Source date (UTC): 2026-02-15 01:26:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022844880771510491

  • Another insight: The elegant manners in the tradition of european philosophical

    Another insight: The elegant manners in the tradition of european philosophical rhetoric are a tool for debate between intellectually honest people attempting to make their arguments before a jury of their peers.
    Instead, I study incentives on one hand and ignorance, error, bias, and deceit on the other.
    When debating the opposition (the parasitic and predatory classes) the science of incentives (everything is reducible to pursuit preservation and consumption of demonstrated interests (property being a primitive)) and the science of deceit are more useful means of debate.
    This is why our libertarian arguments (whether jewish separatist or german free city or anglo imperial in foundation) are ineffective – because the left levies unfounded accusation and we fail to respond in kind, thus losing the argument most of the time.
    I see the european philosophical tradition as debate among the aristocracy in pursuit of preservation of sovereignty on the one hand yet demand for the production of mutually beneficial commons on the other.
    This is NOT the case of the left. The left relies on the feminine to abrahamic to marxist sequence of baitings into hazard by false promise in exchange for parasitism and predation.
    You must defeat an enemy on his terms of defeat. Not on your own. And failing to do so has a long tradition in european history.
    Why? europeans fight for control after which they seek cooperation. The opposition does not do so. Like female chickens they fight to death not to reorder the hierarchy.


    Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 21:13:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020969425281876078

  • AFAIK if you produce the context the AI will pursue the context. if you train an

    AFAIK if you produce the context the AI will pursue the context. if you train an AI on normativity (correlation). you will get normativity. Human normativity is full of falsehoods, deceptions, propaganda, bias, and excuses for criminal activity.


    Source date (UTC): 2026-02-06 06:22:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019657951175401716