Theme: Deception

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45340740_10156755388232264_541499197

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45340740_10156755388232264_5414991975344504832_n_10156755388227264.jpg RHETORICAL AMMUNITION 2RHETORICAL AMMUNITION 2


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:22:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45365685_10156755387577264_630089230

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45365685_10156755387577264_6300892300847349760_n_10156755387572264.jpg RHETORICAL AMMUNITION 3RHETORICAL AMMUNITION 3


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:22:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45353064_10156755386992264_183816712

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45353064_10156755386992264_1838167125613608960_n_10156755386987264.jpg RHETORICAL AMMUNITION 4RHETORICAL AMMUNITION 4


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:22:00 UTC

  • AN EXAMPLE OF DROWNING A LEFTIST IN TRUTH lol Why these nitwits don’t grasp that

    AN EXAMPLE OF DROWNING A LEFTIST IN TRUTH

    lol Why these nitwits don’t grasp that their sophisms merely provide a vehicle for (a) training, (b) recruitment, (c) counter-signaling is beyond me. I (we) use the useful idiots as excuses for advertising, and like true members of the herd, they can’t control NPC impulses. šŸ˜‰

    — BEGIN —

    @curtdoolittle

    Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpu), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.

    ZIONIST PROPAGANDA

    ā€Talking about sophism… Does this meaningless posturing pass for sophistication in your circles? The first stuff is inaccurate and the last stuff is your autistic interpretation of what some people call “taste.” Yes, bad taste is bad and he made the argument against it.

    @curtdoolittle

    You really aren’t trying to pretend you have an argument, or that you have any capacity whatsoever to discourse in these matters. (I am one of the primary researchers of the means by which the Abrahamists, Marxists, Postmodernists, Feminist, and Women, produce non-argument.)

    ZIONIST PROPAGANDA

    ā€Great argumentation queen, Curt, your “argument” was a torrent of misapplied phrases. It’s adorable, being coddled by the nazi right has convinced you that you’re important.

    @curtdoolittle

    You see, each one of these flaccid attempts merely provides us with examples with which to train our followers. Because you don’t understand. The moment you speak we can identify you. You can’t help yourself. The fear drives you. Fear of alphas. Evolution doing its work.

    ZIONIST PROPAGANDA

    ā€You can invent your silly language and attempt to force the world into it, Curt, and it will make the world simpler for you, in the short term at least. But the world and G-D is bigger than you and your edomite arrogance, and this is always reasserted eventually. Good luck.

    @curtdoolittle

    Now, females of the species evolved this trait in order to rally numbers of betas to contain alphas, so that females had more control over their reproduction (and safety). But …. you don’t exactly have reproduction to trade. In fact, you’ve done the opposite. Redistributed it.

    @curtdoolittle

    Well, I write LAW. I just test if you are engaging in a productive, fully informed, voluntary, exchange without imposition by externality, and I test whether you are doing so by fraud or not. Since you fail both counts, and are merely smoke screening theft. Theft and Fraud.

    @curtdoolittle

    So you see, it doesn’t matter if I ‘rally’ anyone, (like you do). It matters only that I can prosecute you and have a tribunal punish you such that you and your ilk never attempt such theft, fraud, and deceit again. You are not potential mates. You have nothing to trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 11:24:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45351599_10156755169397264_688372820

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45351599_10156755169397264_6883728201957244928_o_10156755169392264.jpg ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF RESPONDING TO GSRMSDave NemedikDo you think that the lack of natural or artificial predation to our species contributes to more people exhibiting weakness? Like, if raptors, or perhaps bombs were more of an everyday threat in the US, and people had to focus more so on adapting to practical threats instead of manifesting imaginary problems, there would be less GSRMS present? Curt DoolittleNov 4, 2018, 10:52 AMCiaren CawleyWhy blot out the word female? Also I don’t think that censor algorithms operate on images.Nov 4, 2018, 10:55 AMAlex MackeyI liked it because it is true universally, female brain or not.Nov 4, 2018, 10:59 AMChristopher M MatthewsIt’s a female brain working these arguments even if it’s a male spitting them out.Nov 4, 2018, 11:07 AMCiaren CawleyIt’s simple. Aside from the xenoestrogens in foods, water and packaging that feminises men – exhibiting effeminate behaviour is incentivised by favourable portrayal in popular culture. Being weak and submissive is advertised as being sensitive and ‘in touch with one’s feelings’.

    People have been perverted successfully to irrepairably compromise their biological imperatives and general survival instincts, in exchange for the mere simulation of praise, commendation and repute.

    Imagine being susceptible to being flattered and bribed to deliberately worsen your quality of life, for the dopamine rush that media and social media afford. It’s quite sick to think of the process mechanically.Nov 4, 2018, 11:07 AMMartin Å těpĆ”nIt’s part of it, yes. When natural selection becomes mostly irrelevant, sexual selection starts playing much bigger role. Generally, it’s women doing the selection which is why you generally end up with males full of crazy colors and pointless ornaments. And when you alter female preferences with birth-control making them belive they want more feminine men, you’ll start getting more and more of them.Nov 4, 2018, 11:31 AMJennifer DeanWhat word is blacked out at the end?Nov 4, 2018, 11:39 AMJosey Walesā€œyou don’t understand… the moment you speakā€ šŸ‘ŒšŸ»Nov 4, 2018, 12:44 PMMark DossHe will be villified by femalesNov 4, 2018, 6:32 PMMark DossAre we countering with GRSM attacks sometimes? Is it ever a good way to counter?Nov 4, 2018, 6:39 PMANOTHER EXAMPLE OF RESPONDING TO GSRMS


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 10:40:00 UTC

  • “The more we trust the angrier we get when that trust is broken.”—Noah J Revoy

    —“The more we trust the angrier we get when that trust is broken.”—Noah J Revoy


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:43:00 UTC

  • WHY? WHY ARE WE WINNING? WE ARE NO LONGER HOPEFUL THAT THE REST CAN BE MADE HONO

    WHY? WHY ARE WE WINNING? WE ARE NO LONGER HOPEFUL THAT THE REST CAN BE MADE HONORABLE

    1) Their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we weren’t aware

    2) Then their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we we didn’t stop and punish them

    3) Then their advantage was lie and cheat and deceive– and we didn’t deceive them back.

    4) Now we are – and they are crumbling

    Winning is fun. We are no longer converting, but conquering.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:07:00 UTC

  • JAMES ON “HONOR (GLOATING) IN DECEIT” Regarding “honor-in-deceit”, let’s tease t

    JAMES ON “HONOR (GLOATING) IN DECEIT”

    Regarding “honor-in-deceit”, let’s tease this out because it is beyond that. If you remember Japanese, say during WWII, only cowards surrender. I true warrior would rather die in battle or by suicide (not agreeing with hat, just observing).

    So here we have not just “honor-in-deceit” but “mocking, and gloating”, so that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon.

    Then if you simply close the doors and say never again they come back, please please or you are racist! to let them in. Then you will get punked again and they laugh and mock you.

    Let’s Repeat That:

    —“It’s not just honor-in-deceit, but a mocking, and gloating, that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon.”—

    They POISON the MORAL WELL, and leave only the option for physical retaliation.

    Which is precisely what HONOR REQUIRES (duty, cost of maintaining the commons).

    If we argue and disagree we can separate.

    If we argue and insult we must punish.

    That is the only way to preserve the moral and informational commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 08:53:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45382362_10156754956122264_251624602

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45382362_10156754956122264_2516246022456344576_o_10156754956107264.jpg I have (((Their))) Method of Argument down in form. James has it down in stages of argument and counter-argument. We just need to educate everyone on it. Then we need to educate everyone that the only reason to NOT engage in ‘warfare’ and instead in debate, is if we are actually debating in order to determine a trade when we don’t agree, or a good, when we do. Then we need to engage in ‘War’ often enough that we suppress the ‘poisoning of the well’.Andrea RoyallLet me sum up Librarian Vee.. ā€œI don’t understand a fucking thing you said because those words are not in my vocabulary. I’m too lazy and entilted to educate myself. Nor, why should I because I’m chosen..ā€Nov 4, 2018, 8:54 AMCurt DoolittleI took it as an honest statement of “thank you for listing those out for me”. I realize it can be taken either way. But I riffed off it.Nov 4, 2018, 8:54 AMAndrea RoyallThats because you are far more patient that I am. It’s why you do what you do šŸ™‚Nov 4, 2018, 8:55 AMGiego CaleiroJoao FabianoNov 4, 2018, 8:58 AMNick DahlheimAndrea Royall I love you because you’re ferocious for the truthNov 4, 2018, 9:03 AMCurt DoolittleAndrea Royall did you … did you just try to call me a nice guy? lolNov 4, 2018, 9:04 AMCurt Doolittle(Don’t tell anyone. I covet my reputation as a dick)Nov 4, 2018, 9:05 AMRob EllermanIt should be relatively simple to identify ā€œmoralisticā€ argumentation — ā€œI’m not yet convinced you can argue without itā€ —- it’s the god damn virtue signaling and white knighting – I call it context dropping … these people can’t hold or don’t want to hold any propositions against uniform criteria … the lower IQ right is prone to this as well … they pick their team then throw shit arguments at the wall in machine gun fashion hoping something sticksNov 4, 2018, 9:14 AMJeff UrizenThe lefts only moral dynamic is caring /fairness. They simply Ignore loyalty, authority, and sanctity. The problem is really on the right, the right doesn’t understand morality well, it understands traditional values specifically, it can verbalize the specific beliefs it holds like patriotism, but it doesn’t understand the structure that those traditional values fall into, and if you lack that information it’s hard to argue why they matter. If you don’t understand the structure of morality you can’t see that the left is merely winning by ignoring moral dynamics completely, they’re taking things out of context, and the right is failing to be able to say “hey what about loyalty, what about authority, or sanctity. You have to make the left answer the questions of these other moral dynamics. We need a cultural shift where these dynamics each get a day in court in the political Dialoge.Nov 4, 2018, 9:23 AMAndrea RoyallCurt Doolittle me?? I said patient…. šŸ™‚ no way I’d imply you were a nice guy…Nov 4, 2018, 9:27 AMRob EllermanThey signal caring and fairness … but drop the context when it doesn’t serve their implicit ends … happens on the right all the time

    In terms of values – I don’t care whether they are traditional or not – the question is ā€œwhat are the consequences of a consistent application of the proposition?ā€ If you don’t drop the context of your implicationsNov 4, 2018, 9:31 AMAndrea RoyallI’d posit that you cannot have caring/fairness without loyalty, authority, sanctity.. and ultimately, agency. It’s all just a facade otherwise. Which, in my mind, perfectly describes the left.

    And the issue with morality on the right is that it derives it’s morality from Christianity, wholesale. That’s a lot of deprogramming that has to happen.Nov 4, 2018, 9:39 AMRob EllermanAndrea Royall how do we square the idea that Europeans have genetically determinate reproductive strategies – but are also ā€œprogrammableā€ via Christian edicts and ā€œdeprogrammableā€ via propertarian thinking šŸ¤”Nov 4, 2018, 10:17 AMAndrea RoyallThat’s a very good question. Curt has more answers to that. I broke that programming long ago. Basically, because I was a questioning, impetuous child that didn’t accept authority. I haven’t changed much since.. lolNov 4, 2018, 10:19 AMRob EllermanAndrea Royall I think my disposition was probably pretty similar šŸ‘ŒNov 4, 2018, 10:26 AMAndrea RoyallChristianity cut Europeans from their roots.. just as Islam has done to the Iraqis and Syrians. Less so for the Lebanese and Persians. Which, I find, quite interestingNov 4, 2018, 10:29 AMRob EllermanNature or nurture Curt Doolittle?Nov 4, 2018, 10:29 AMGilberto CarlosA sniper is patient.Nov 4, 2018, 10:59 AMJames Lyons Sr.I’ll stand the thin blue line between respect my light and fear my dark until cut down because my nuts ( those I love) won’t stay in the bag…and cause me to venture and strayNov 4, 2018, 11:10 AMAndrea RoyallCurt is our philosophical sniper.. šŸ™‚Nov 4, 2018, 12:11 PMI have (((Their))) Method of Argument down in form. James has it down in stages of argument and counter-argument. We just need to educate everyone on it. Then we need to educate everyone that the only reason to NOT engage in ‘warfare’ and instead in debate, is if we are actually debating in order to determine a trade when we don’t agree, or a good, when we do. Then we need to engage in ‘War’ often enough that we suppress the ‘poisoning of the well’.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 08:49:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT “DEBATE” STRATEGY ISN’T TO DEBATE Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-d

    THE LEFT “DEBATE” STRATEGY ISN’T TO DEBATE

    Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.

    The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits.

    Left Wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique.

    Right wing = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”.

    The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency.

    It’s that simple.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 07:11:00 UTC