Theme: Deception

[W]hy these nitwits don’t grasp that their sophisms merely provide a vehicle for (a) training, (b) recruitment, (c) counter-signaling is beyond me. I (we) use the useful idiots as excuses for advertising, and like true members of the herd, they can’t control NPC impulses. 😉 — BEGIN — @curtdoolittle Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpu), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy. ZIONIST PROPAGANDA ‏Talking about sophism… Does this meaningless posturing pass for sophistication in your circles? The first stuff is inaccurate and the last stuff is your autistic interpretation of what some people call “taste.” Yes, bad taste is bad and he made the argument against it. @curtdoolittle You really aren’t trying to pretend you have an argument, or that you have any capacity whatsoever to discourse in these matters. (I am one of the primary researchers of the means by which the Abrahamists, Marxists, Postmodernists, Feminist, and Women, produce non-argument.) ZIONIST PROPAGANDA ‏Great argumentation queen, Curt, your “argument” was a torrent of misapplied phrases. It’s adorable, being coddled by the nazi right has convinced you that you’re important. @curtdoolittle You see, each one of these flaccid attempts merely provides us with examples with which to train our followers. Because you don’t understand. The moment you speak we can identify you. You can’t help yourself. The fear drives you. Fear of alphas. Evolution doing its work. ZIONIST PROPAGANDA ‏You can invent your silly language and attempt to force the world into it, Curt, and it will make the world simpler for you, in the short term at least. But the world and G-D is bigger than you and your edomite arrogance, and this is always reasserted eventually. Good luck. @curtdoolittle Now, females of the species evolved this trait in order to rally numbers of betas to contain alphas, so that females had more control over their reproduction (and safety). But …. you don’t exactly have reproduction to trade. In fact, you’ve done the opposite. Redistributed it. @curtdoolittle Well, I write LAW. I just test if you are engaging in a productive, fully informed, voluntary, exchange without imposition by externality, and I test whether you are doing so by fraud or not. Since you fail both counts, and are merely smoke screening theft. Theft and Fraud. @curtdoolittle So you see, it doesn’t matter if I ‘rally’ anyone, (like you do). It matters only that I can prosecute you and have a tribunal punish you such that you and your ilk never attempt such theft, fraud, and deceit again. You are not potential mates. You have nothing to trade.