By: Pat Ryan
America expended its goodwill as the great equality experiment via democratic tradition during the two World Wars, ensuring the mythology was monopolized by grass-is-greener communism. …. America traded mythological hope for material justice. Guess when discontent institutionalized?
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-09 11:06:00 UTC
DIVISIVE? DIVISIVE? STUPIDITY IS WHAT’S DIVISIVE
(the answer to the right)
I worked to save my people from that false promise of liberty, and its baiting into moral hazard, by our ancestral enemy, under rothbardian libertinism. I was divisive in attacking rothbard and less so mises and hoppe.
But I didn’t punch right unless someone punched me first. Although, I have to confess when I felt the fascists were going to continue to us down after C-ville, I more than considered it – and rightly so.
Next, the New Right Wing Postmodernists came after me – seeking attention. Then Spencer came out with a quip, and then The Woo Woo Christians felt emboldened and rallied, and now the fascists are laying ground once again.
There is zero reason to talk about me. There is zero reason for infighting between:
– Fascists (rule of man by inspiration),
– Nomocrats: Rule of Law by science, and;
– Christians (Rule of Priests by woo woo).
If you want to criticize rule of law, rule of man, or rule of ‘religion’ then do so. I do. But then, if you personalize that attack by taking on ‘one of the right’ rather than the general rule, you’re just a click-seeking attention-whore, doing the right a disservice.
These are the three ancestral classes of our elites:
1. Warriors, Soldiers (Masculine Defense),
“Those who Fight (Father)”
-and-
2. Judges and Governors(Cooperation), Burghers, Business, Farmers
“Those who Work (Brother)”
-and-
3. Priests and Public Intellectuals (Feminine Consumption)
“Those Who Pray (Educate, Mother)”
And we use our three classes of elites to our advantage and we keep them incompetition to ensure that we can use each as needed.
At present all three classes: Fascists (Dominant Force ), Nomocrats (Practical Trade) and the Religious (Submissive Resistance) all all searching for a solution given that the Right Has Failed.
Now, I’m pretty sure that y’all got nuthin, because (a) there is no fascist leader of any ability and there won’t be until fascism is re-articulated in adult language, (b) religion of the christian type only survived as a wife to the aristocracy – and islam is winning the war of ‘monopolies’, And at present, christianity is past its expiration date – because without operational means of governing an educated population it’s irrelevant and relegated to either the bible belt, or providing comfort to the outcast and underclass in the rest of the country.
So only a fascist or a group of nomocrats are possible, and christianity has to simply pick one or both to bet on because christians have no answer – and frandkly appear ‘cucked’ and perhaps the source of current ‘cuckery’.
So as far as I know we need a fascist (strong man leader), nomocracy (rule of law by which to govern a complex polity), and christians as a block to move the body faithful out of a condition of failure.
It takes all three.
However, the only means of governing a polity is and always will be law and economic information, because they are the ONLY POSSIBLE MEANS of operating a polity of greater scale than a village congregation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-08 09:59:00 UTC
LIES AND DEFEATING THEM – THE RED QUEEN OF EUROPEAN VS SEMITIC CIVS
—“They are incredibly good at deceit. Very good. However, we’re very good at identifying it”—CD
—“The Red Queen.”—Martin Štěpán
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 18:42:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103727697040105472
I’m against the ancestral method of competition: false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 18:10:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103719598166179840
“THE GOYIM KNOW”
Their technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. It’s not just usury. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard. Instead, it’s every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and crique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional.
It ends now.
De-financialization, De-politicization, De-distinformationalization, and restoration of our eugenic group evolutionary strategy in our own self interest.
It’s easy.
The law. The most intolerant law ever made.
With the law we make the extirpation of parasites a for-profit business for every citizen of character
Propertarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 14:59:00 UTC
ADDITION
a) has a point, b) is evil, c) is stupid, d) is mistaken, cognitively biased, overconfident, attention-seeking, dominance-expressing, and insufficiently knowledgeable to make such an statement or argument.
Almost always (d). (PS: IMO, RPM always has a point)
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 13:56:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103655624968228864
Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103442466013892609
IN REPLY TO:
@BobMurphyEcon
When you read a tweet that you disagree with, you conclude that the writer:
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103442466013892609
LIES AND DEFEATING THEM – THE RED QUEEN OF EUROPEAN VS SEMITIC CIVS
—“They are incredibly good at deceit. Very good. However, we’re very good at identifying it”—CD
—“The Red Queen.”—Martin Štěpán
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 13:42:00 UTC
JOSEPH POSTMA DRILLS DOWN TO THE NET OF IT
—“They are incredibly good at deceit. Very good. However, we’re very good at identifying it, and the ONLY reason they’ve gotten away with it this far is because they own the media, and the ability to lie to the commons. That ends with Propertarianism. The thing is, it only takes a single one of us to identify their deceit and to make it known to others, while for them it takes a trillion-dollar media global enterprise to maintain it.”—Joseph E. Postma
Under law, it takes only one of us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 13:25:00 UTC
I’m against the ancestral method of competition: false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 13:10:00 UTC
—“When the next fascist movement rises again we need to ensure that sophists are dealt with accordingly. Never again can we allow this to happen again because of these sophists and bullshitters The coming generation of europeans will either perish or reach the stars. Lets hope they reach the stars.”—Phill Knyspel
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 12:35:00 UTC