Theme: Deception

  • One you realize how much they are behind it all, you will become … extremely a

    One you realize how much they are behind it all, you will become … extremely angry. It’s almost unimaginable that people can be that good at deceit that they can fool the vast majority of a civilization – until you realize they did it before with christianity and they almost did it with marxism, and now they’re doing it with genocide by postmodernism.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 12:29:00 UTC

  • JUSTIFICATION OF SELF DECEPTION By: Rosenborg Predmetsky (via Brandon Hayes) Som

    JUSTIFICATION OF SELF DECEPTION

    By: Rosenborg Predmetsky (via Brandon Hayes)

    Someone pointed out the other day that self deception can be advantageous from the standpoint of natural selection.

    Robert trivers has great work on this.

    When a feminist convinces herself that she is justified in acquiring a sugar daddy because patriarchy economically oppressed her, this is sexually antagonistic co-evolution.

    When a black person justifies blm activism despite blacks being much more a problem for whites than the other way around, this is group evolutionary strategy whose purpose is reciprocal altruism to maximize inclusive fitness for his kin group; I.e. group evolutionary strategy


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 10:30:00 UTC

  • A LEGIONNAIRE DEMON NAMED “WHITE SUPREMACY” by Rosenborg Predmetsky March 4 at 9

    A LEGIONNAIRE DEMON NAMED “WHITE SUPREMACY”

    by Rosenborg Predmetsky

    March 4 at 9:20 PM ·

    Leftists are increasingly obsessed with the idea that a Legionnaire demon named “White Supremacy” pervades our consciousness.

    But isn’t this the very same culture whose postwar obsession is dominated by the demonization of Hitler as the Ultimate Evil and also allegedly the demonic avatar of white supremacy?

    If it is true that World War 2 was a war against racism and white supremacy, and yet our very own culture is white supremacist, why did we go to war with Hitler? Was it really over racism?

    I mean, it’s not like those who got us into the war were what we would consider “woke” on racial issues.

    Winston Churchill in his “Zionism versus Bolshevism” piece:

    “In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new.

    From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution.

    It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

    In 1937, he told the Palestine Royal Commission: “I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.”

    He concluded that “Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country”, thereby clearing the way “for the advent of Russian Communism” (Diary entry, 18 August).

    General George S. Patton said:

    August 8

    “According to the Bishop, more than two million Poles have been taken to Russia for slave labor.

    […]

    The difficulty in understanding the Russian is that we do not take cognizance of the fact that he is not a European but an Asiatic and therefore thinks deviously. We can no more understand a Russian than a Chinaman or a Japanese and, from what I have seen of them, I have no particular desire to understand them except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them. In addition to his other amiable characteristics, the Russian has no regard for human life and is an all out son of a bitch, a barbarian, and a chronic drunk.”

    Another pair of earlier diary entries, written only days after Germany’s unconditional surrender:

    “14 May

    I have never seen in any army at any time, including the German Imperial Army of 1912, as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army. The officers with few exceptions give the appearance of recently civilized Mongolian bandits. The men passed in review with a very good imitation of the goose step. They give me the impression of something that is to be feared in future world political reorganization.

    18 May

    In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease, because while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms’ whereas we excel in all three of these. If it should be necessary to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better.

    Eisenhower and Bradley were somewhat worried about the attitude of the soldiers. Personally, I don’t think the soldier cares… so well disciplined and so patriotic he will fight anywhere he is told to fight, and do a good job. I believe that by taking a strong attitude, the Russians will back down. So far we have yielded too much to their Mongolian nature.”

    extracts from letters to his wife, Beatrice:

    “21 July 1945

    I left here at 0630 and got there in two hours and a half. We could have gone faster but for the fact that if one flies over Russian occupied territory, they shoot at you – nice friends.

    […]

    The Mongols are a bad lot, even the U.S. sector has their guards in it [i.e. to prevent them from looting, etc.], and I had to have a pass. However, I did not need it. I just pointed to my [Russian] medal and the world was mine…

    Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race and we about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist.

    It’s said that for the first week after they took it, all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it had I been allowed.

    31 August 1945

    The stuff in the papers about fraternization is all wet… All that sort of writing is done by Jews to get revenge. Actually the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. It’s a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans.”

    cf. a diary entry of the same date:

    “I also wrote a letter to the Secretary of War, Mr. Stimson, on the question of the pro-Jewish influence in the Military Government of Germany. I dared do this because when I was in Washington, he showed me a great deal of correspondence he had had with the Secretary of State and Mr. Morgenthau prior to the Quebec Conference.

    2 September 1945

    I had never heard that we fought to de-natzify Germany – live and learn. What we are doing is to utterly destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe so that Russia can swallow the whole.

    14 September 1945

    I was going to Nancy in the morning to become a citizen but Ike phoned he is coming here so I had best stay and see him. Perhaps I can make him see the menace of the M’s. They have 300,000 troops in Checo. [i.e. Czechoslovakia] now and are running 200,000 more in, and we are pulling out – getting the boys home by Xmas. It may well result in getting them back in the trenches by spring…

    I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending PW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands where many will be starved to death…”

    All extracts taken from The Patton Papers, 1940–1945, edited by Martin Blumenson


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 11:00:00 UTC

  • “It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to sur

    —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—Rosenborg Predmetsky


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 10:15:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2255506/Monumental-deceit-How-politicians-lied-lied-true-purpose-European-behemoth.html


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 10:10:00 UTC

  • There are no people that can refute me. There are people who only play supernatu

    There are no people that can refute me. There are people who only play supernatural or sophistic games, or claim that some other solution is superior. Well, good. Those are competing ideas but they are’t a criticism of mine. There still AREN’T any.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-04 00:24:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102364252751491072

    Reply addressees: @camelback_t

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102363649425977344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102363649425977344

  • OMG. New IQ test. Accusing another person of being a Fed means you are intellect

    OMG. New IQ test. Accusing another person of being a Fed means you are intellectually unfit, and get the helicopter treatment as well. Out of the political pool is one thing. But you need to bet out of the GENE pool.

    lol


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-04 00:12:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102361062446379013

  • omfg. New IQ test. Accusing another person of being a fed means you are intellec

    omfg. New IQ test. Accusing another person of being a fed means you are intellectually unfit, and get the helicopter treatment as well. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-04 00:10:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102360733529133056

    Reply addressees: @camelback_t

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102360430750638080


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102360430750638080

  • If we fail it will because the majority of idiots in the world can tell the diff

    If we fail it will because the majority of idiots in the world can tell the difference between truth, sophism, and sarcasm. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-04 00:08:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102360143151411200

    Reply addressees: @realjoshneal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102328307331334144


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102328307331334144

  • “The bigger risk I assess is cleaving your following and only keeping the radica

    —“The bigger risk I assess is cleaving your following and only keeping the radicals because people get scared away from the movement. They are projecting, good people don’t go out and attack bystanders or commit lone wolf attacks. Good people stick to their values regardless of the media they consume and the more good people involved with the movement the less likely it is to steer that way”—

    People leave, internalize, and return, because in the end, we are the only game in town.

    Making a trade, not fulfilling a want without cost.

    Strategy is to stay on message long enough to desensitize the message.

    Combination of positive policies and reality of revolution. The shock wears off. The desensitization progresses.

    Education evolves to interest.

    Watch…

    Method to the madness.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 20:05:00 UTC