Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • “For the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patient

    —“For the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patiently suffer the etiquette of degenerates and fools.”— Chris Tangemann

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 10:14:00 UTC

  • Tara, He just took a swing at me last night – totally unprovoked. And I don’t us

    Tara, He just took a swing at me last night – totally unprovoked. And I don’t usually let such things stand. But general counsel is to let him be – “he’ll just prevaricate and weasel word anyway”. Thanks for advice -hugs

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 16:20:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107678196290543616

    Reply addressees: @realitycalls8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107652861947797504

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107652861947797504

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54520023_10157056588382264_899664665

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54520023_10157056588382264_8996646653238706176_o_10157056588377264.jpg Skye StewartRather than spiritually Woke, many of these people are intellectually BrokeMar 18, 2019, 11:07 AMBill JoslinThe superordinant in Which we are all beholden (i.e. god) always distills down to nature. In this context feminine predilections to faith, care, redistribution (hypergamy and a long list of other things) and masculine predilections toward competition, heirarchy, objects, (and a whole long list of other things) exists as “GODS WILL” i.e. intrinsic nature to men and womenMar 18, 2019, 11:10 AMGreg HamiltonIf figure if the gods are so awesome they can take care of their will themselves.Mar 18, 2019, 12:21 PMPatrick SmythThis is why it is almost always impossible to talk honestly and accurately about politics among women.Mar 18, 2019, 1:15 PMNick HeywoodBefore any f’n Nimrod can even claim to be enacting “God’s will”? They’ve gotta be prepared to know truth. Or at least know or discover as much truth as ya can get.

    Ya don’t get that criticizing someone else’s attempt!Mar 18, 2019, 2:45 PMSteve PenderGod’s will = man’s will, she just doesn’t know it.Mar 18, 2019, 3:12 PMAmanda HarveyThe real meaning of ‘get woke go broke.’Mar 18, 2019, 4:02 PMAaron NeelyWhen the atheist has a more biblical view of gender roles than the Christian.Mar 18, 2019, 5:25 PMChris TangemannMen do the fighting. Women may or may not help.Mar 18, 2019, 11:02 PMChris TangemannNever in the history of mankind has an army of women defeated even a tribe of men.Mar 18, 2019, 11:03 PMChris TangemannFor the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patiently suffer the etiquette of degenerates and fools.Mar 18, 2019, 11:12 PMCurt Doolittlequoted, shared.Mar 19, 2019, 10:13 AMEric McGowanImagine not seeing God in that thought process.. wait, never mind, she’s a woman and you addressed that in your original thought.Mar 19, 2019, 11:07 AMMonica MarquezI see God in a microscopeMar 19, 2019, 12:22 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 11:02:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54114819_10157056551607264_366004875

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54114819_10157056551607264_3660048753148035072_n_10157056551602264.jpg From @[506159294:2048:Skye Stewart]

    —Idealism is the gateway drug for shit thinking in philosophy.”— CD

    I want a T-shirt 😜Josh JeppsonMany physicists are philosophical Idealists because they’re honest enough to admit the model cannot be the model builder. Here was one such physicist:

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691119643/Mar 18, 2019, 8:48 PMCurt DoolittleMany mathematicians are mathematical idealists. They’re wrong, but outside of their god awful effect on physics it doesn’t much matter.

    That said, their effect on physics has been pretty ‘costly’.

    And their affect on education even worse.

    Imagine if we taught math operationally?

    Everyone would ‘get it’. It’s fucking simple.

    Math: how to break stuff into measurements. duh.Mar 19, 2019, 5:44 PMJosh JeppsonI still don’t understand how you’re exactly using the words ‘measurement’, ‘test’, and ‘calculation’.

    I went through your site yet again (obviously have been there many times over the years), reading through what related articles I could find as well as reading through your glossary. I couldn’t find as precise of definitions for those three words as I would need to philosophically understand and agree with your worldview.

    The most I saw ‘calculation’ defined as was ‘a deliberate process of transforming inputs into outputs’, which doesn’t philosophically tell me much (let’s already get into this ‘deliberate’ ‘process’, let’s get into intentionality and theory of language).

    I studied analytic chemistry at the graduate level and am very familiar with the level of rigor you’re grasping for epistemologically. However, I would never dream of thinking one could build law and analyze morality through such science, so I’d like to see how you’re using operationalism to do so, these operations in practice.

    So far, it looks like only high-level reference, with no low-level demonstration.Mar 19, 2019, 9:02 PMCurt Doolittlecalculation is correct. test i don’t think needs clarification other than testing the dimensions i state in testimonialism. Measurement: any standard of commensurability by any possible dimension of perception, that can be subjectively tested by human perception, as a means of overcoming limits to perception and preventing bias and error. Mathematics consists of nothing other than tests of positional (constant) relations, using positional (unique) naming, providing universal commensurability at scale independence.

    I don’t think you understand. see hayes’ post today or pisarro’s comment.Mar 19, 2019, 9:35 PMCurt Doolittleit’s not any more possible for reciprocity to be false than it is for one’s choice to be irrational. We can always explain. Since we can both parties face zeno’s challenge of moving halfway toward one another to the point of marginal indifference, or retreat.Mar 19, 2019, 9:38 PMJosh JeppsonCurt Doolittle What does it mean to test the categorical consistency of a name, though? How do humans construct shared names and shared meaning? Is it just the case that you don’t have such inquiry as an ambition, but are only concerned with the scientific portion of the moral deliberative process?

    I think you’re correct insofar as the scientific portion, but then wonder what innovations you think you could be providing over what is already known to science and pragmatist law (unloading claims has obviously been known of and done for as long as humans have had declarative language).

    I know your ambitions aren’t that, but are trying to claim morality can be evaluated through declarative constructs like evolutionary theory, so I want to get to how you believe that is possible.Mar 20, 2019, 12:02 AMCorey HarmsI NEED this on a shirt.Mar 21, 2019, 2:32 PMFrom Skye Stewart

    —Idealism is the gateway drug for shit thinking in philosophy.”— CD

    I want a T-shirt 😜

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 10:35:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54425449_10157055895237264_319932843

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54425449_10157055895237264_3199328431644868608_o_10157055895227264.jpg OPEN SEASON.Corey HarmsHANG EM UP AND BLEED EM OUT!Mar 18, 2019, 1:17 AMHoward Van Der KlauwBlocked yet?Mar 18, 2019, 1:18 AMCurt DoolittleJohn MarkMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMSolomon VolodymyrWant to see it happenMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMPhilip SaundersStephan Kinsella keeps stating things are “not libertarian” as if this is an argument.Mar 18, 2019, 1:29 AMJames PortocarreroMar 18, 2019, 1:31 AMPhilip SaundersYikes.Mar 18, 2019, 1:33 AMCurt Doolittle(((ethics)))Mar 18, 2019, 1:34 AMPhilip SaundersLow trust afMar 18, 2019, 1:36 AMVince Reefuck that guys a piece of shitMar 18, 2019, 1:40 AMConnor SumnersLol I love this. I may have to make a portrait in this theme of Curt now.Mar 18, 2019, 1:41 AMJosef KalininI’ve always found Libertarian individualism to be a grotesque rebranding of hedonistic egoism and an immensely hateable rationalistic reductionism. It’s easy to ignore the problems of society when you define the individual and his direct self-interest as the highest category of importance and explain literally the entirety of human dynamics according to the egoistic paradigm. They don’t care about issues like racial suicide and demographic replacement because the entire concept of an ethnic identity is too collectivist for them and they would happily see the world blend together into mystery meat under some utopian view of a world of individuals without nations, cultures, or otherwise “collectivist” blankets defining them.

    TLDR, libertarians are sellouts, and deserve 9mm hollow point inside the backs of their skulls.Mar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMSaber LambertHes a fucking lawyer what did you expect hahaMar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMFelix RyanGarbage rothbardian ethics.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMJosef KalininThe fucking constitution itself is anti-libertarian because it’s not a private document.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMFelix RyanJosef Kalinin nice.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMCurt DoolittleJosef Kalinin Shit. That made me laugh hard… lolMar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMFelix RyanI can hear the hand rubbing when he tweets that.Mar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMRyan WilliamsTear him to bits and shit on the remains. His ghetto pilpul libertarian freeriding must die.Mar 18, 2019, 1:54 AMM Shawn DavisMuh philosophical purityMar 18, 2019, 1:55 AMAdam DavidI used to call myself a libertarian.

    The special mystery meat blanderup was the fundamental hangup i had which lead me to search out a better way.

    Lets expose them to P law before putting them against the metaphorical wall.Mar 18, 2019, 2:17 AMJohn EdwardThey violated the rights of the people who worked hard to get degrees from those schools without cheating/bribing. You reduce the value of the good (diploma) by issuing counterfeits.Mar 18, 2019, 2:46 AMMichael D HaasWhat an idiotMar 18, 2019, 3:45 AMPaddy LynchCurt’s giant dick busts more hips than old age and car accidents combinedMar 18, 2019, 3:55 AMPhill KnyspelThe sophist takes on Doolittle . Round 1 ding ding hahaMar 18, 2019, 4:17 AMJaromír MiškovskýOk Ideology with with such strong dictionary that it can be translated to call computer porgram. Vs. project where dig accros multiple sources. Hmm….Mar 18, 2019, 4:26 AMSolomon VolodymyrI used to be L before I realised that utopian state of non-coercion can’t exist for most peoples. That’s where P comes in.Mar 18, 2019, 5:16 AMMathuin HillgarthStephanie who???Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMathuin HillgarthGotta love autocorrect to aid in an insultMar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMSolomon VolodymyrIt’s our insurance, guaranteeing liberty by seizing sovereignty; removing parasitism by promising reciprocity.Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMicah PezdirtzAnyone calling P nonsense just demonstrates to me the state of their denial.Mar 18, 2019, 6:10 AMEric BestPhilip Saunders his rhetoric is very “religious.”Mar 18, 2019, 6:59 AMHans JohanssonModern libertarianism has essentially turned into corporate neoliberalism.Mar 18, 2019, 7:13 AMEly HarmanBuying your way into college is a lot less stupid and destructive than affirmative action. At least the money benefits the merit based admissions and compensates them for putting up with fuckwit heirs. And if people make something of THEIR lives, I don’t see the harm in giving their children a shot.Mar 18, 2019, 9:04 AMMoritz BierlingIt would be ok if they openly said that you can buy admissionMar 18, 2019, 9:22 AMCurt DoolittleMoritz Bierling correctMar 18, 2019, 10:38 AMJoseph RossI agree with you Curt. Even if I thought you were wrong I wouldn’t side with Kinsella because he had a blue check mark he doesn’t deserve.Mar 18, 2019, 9:26 PMJoseph RossKinsella is someone who just needs to be laughed at. He literally said it’s not a NAP violation to steal bitcoins because there’s no contract involved since it’s decentralized. According to him, since it isn’t a NAP violation there’s no recourse against someone who steals them.Mar 18, 2019, 9:28 PMJimmy KnowlesHe goes over the wallMar 18, 2019, 9:29 PMMichael PattinsonAll this years with HHH and still winging like a little girl.LolMar 19, 2019, 2:50 AMVince Reeoy vey all this antisemetic dog whistlingMar 19, 2019, 2:55 AMJC TrottStealing a seat at a college is “Libertarian”?

    Doesn’t that offend the NAP?Mar 19, 2019, 6:15 AMPhilip SaundersJC Trott the point is that it’s done under the table, rather than openly (which would be fine). There is a false pretence of a purely meritocratic game.

    Also, it has potential to counterfeit the value of the qualification.Mar 19, 2019, 6:21 AMCréachán Ó NáraighPlease take down his intellectual communism in the most public and conclusive manner. It’s already been done but it needs to be done again for a new audience. Example:

    https://strangerousthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/the-economic-principles-of-intellectual-property-and-the-fallacies-of-intellectual-communism/Mar 20, 2019, 12:05 AMDerek YoungFormer libertarian! John Mark has introduced me to Propertarianism! Amazing stuff!Mar 20, 2019, 9:19 AMRichard HeathenMar 22, 2019, 6:32 PMOPEN SEASON.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 01:16:00 UTC

  • Propertarian Speech means every man a sherriff – it’s the OPPOSITE of postmodern

    Propertarian Speech means every man a sherriff – it’s the OPPOSITE of postmodern speech where every woman is a liar.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-17 16:33:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107318974851829766

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53803575_10157054935572264_172668112

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53803575_10157054935572264_1726681121913044992_o_10157054935567264.jpg HERE IS THE FINAL BRICK IN THE WALL => IT”S ALL VIRTUE SIGNALING

    —“Javier Perez de Quaoar

    [Liberals are] Not motivated by their good intentions, but by their emotional need to continue a just war that was won in 1965 by mutating it into a wrongheaded (and conveniently unwinnable) war on every perceivable or imaginable inequality. It is as if Patton, upon reaching Czechoslovakia, had decided to launch a general war on “tyranny” to satisfy his lust for a good tank battle.”—

    —“It is the liberal order that is fundamentally hierarchical, class-based and difractive (it relies on difference and division to survive). Like Hillary’s recent resurrection of her southern drawl or wealthy/hollywood lib types buy their kids into elite schools, it is a conscious (or even unconscious) methodology for obtaining/keeping power while faking solidarity with hundreds (if not thousands) of seperate groups they actually care nothing for.

    This liberal order is breaking down in that the infighting and emboldening of these various castes is bringing their own power struggles to the surface (ihlan omar and muslims vs jews, blacks vs latinos, lgbtqflavor-o-month libs against straight libs etc) in such a way that reveals the real shell game.

    This also fits an idea out of Albion’s Seed where there is a distinct relationship with liberals (and southerners) to the ‘cavaliers’…those anglo-saxon nobility that came to America in it’s early years. It is the ‘borderer’ that is actually more egalitarian.

    African Americans have never left the plantation. Ever. LBJ was absolutely successful. They have remained a solid Dem voting block ever since his ‘great society’ project.”—Brandy RosenbergBrian MillerMar 17, 2019, 3:21 PMEric BestLet’s be honest though, at this point we’re the ones on the plantation. The underclass sits and consumes the fruits of productive labor who has no real representation any longer.Mar 18, 2019, 9:24 AMHERE IS THE FINAL BRICK IN THE WALL => IT”S ALL VIRTUE SIGNALING

    —“Javier Perez de Quaoar

    [Liberals are] Not motivated by their good intentions, but by their emotional need to continue a just war that was won in 1965 by mutating it into a wrongheaded (and conveniently unwinnable) war on every perceivable or imaginable inequality. It is as if Patton, upon reaching Czechoslovakia, had decided to launch a general war on “tyranny” to satisfy his lust for a good tank battle.”—

    —“It is the liberal order that is fundamentally hierarchical, class-based and difractive (it relies on difference and division to survive). Like Hillary’s recent resurrection of her southern drawl or wealthy/hollywood lib types buy their kids into elite schools, it is a conscious (or even unconscious) methodology for obtaining/keeping power while faking solidarity with hundreds (if not thousands) of seperate groups they actually care nothing for.

    This liberal order is breaking down in that the infighting and emboldening of these various castes is bringing their own power struggles to the surface (ihlan omar and muslims vs jews, blacks vs latinos, lgbtqflavor-o-month libs against straight libs etc) in such a way that reveals the real shell game.

    This also fits an idea out of Albion’s Seed where there is a distinct relationship with liberals (and southerners) to the ‘cavaliers’…those anglo-saxon nobility that came to America in it’s early years. It is the ‘borderer’ that is actually more egalitarian.

    African Americans have never left the plantation. Ever. LBJ was absolutely successful. They have remained a solid Dem voting block ever since his ‘great society’ project.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-17 15:08:00 UTC

  • Propertarian Speech means every man a sherriff – it’s the OPPOSITE of postmodern

    Propertarian Speech means every man a sherriff – it’s the OPPOSITE of postmodern speech where every woman is a liar.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-17 12:32:00 UTC

  • MENTAL ILLNESS ON THE EXTREME RIGHT —“What do you think about the false flag r

    MENTAL ILLNESS ON THE EXTREME RIGHT

    —“What do you think about the false flag rumors?”—

    ^ I think mental illness is as common on the right as it is on the left. The simplest possible solution is always the answer. There is no conspiracy between mcveigh, brevik, and tarrant, other than one of common genetic interest. And nothing other than personal discipline required to carry out their actions.

    The psychological reason for these forms of mental illness is to self sedate such that one feels comfortable and justified doing nothing. Paranoia is the result of mental defect combined with lack of agency.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-17 11:37:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53110660_10157053165187264_332485100

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53110660_10157053165187264_332485100694405120_o_10157053165182264.jpg Goss Hume>radical centrists

    All spinelessMar 16, 2019, 8:22 PMCurt Doolittlewhere did you get ‘radical centrists’????

    Are you stupid, or countersignaling?

    Curt predicts timeline in 2006.

    Stays on message thru the present.

    Present overton window continues to match the timeline

    Centrists are now swallowing black pills.

    Prop has circumvented traps of natsoc’s.

    Prop has provided an actionable set of demands and means of implementing them.

    Whatever stupid shit you meant, is incoherent in the context.Mar 16, 2019, 8:26 PMGoss Hume”Center pivot” is a tautology used by politically minded individuals that are resplendent in not being tied down to a position but love being edgy. Devil’s in the little details, Curt.Mar 16, 2019, 8:32 PMCurt Doolittlecenter pivot means we supply answers for the mainstream rather than try to generate demand on the fringe.

    i do details like no one else on the right by orders of magnitude.Mar 16, 2019, 8:46 PMBill JoslinPeterson, Tim pool, rubin, sargon are all calling themselves “radical centrists” (if central position didn’t included universalism and a reframing of a republic as a democracy – I’d be a centrist)

    Truth is – you can’t avoid group identity whether that be on cultural, political, ethnic religous or racial grounds. Our primary issue that has gotten us to this point grounds in identity – specifically, special interests groups able to compete for political privelege has caused the conditions we are in now. And what makes this competition possible stems from democracy coupled with primacy of legislation over rule of law (law writing) AND WHY WE ACTUALLY DO HAVE THE SOLUTION.

    By eliminating access to law as the means to further group interests we move group competition from law making (proxy for violence) into commons creation (special interest groups can no longer seek the force of law – the only alternative is to build community to solve community issues)

    THIS NECESSITATES A PIVOT TO THE CENTER.

    Addressing the center means changing the status quo.Mar 16, 2019, 8:57 PMJason MurphyWouldn’t the idea of centrism preclude the very notion of radical?Mar 16, 2019, 9:00 PMBill JoslinThe battle of the indentarian right and regressive left demonstrates the systemic issues of Western civ in a distilled and simplified form.

    Normies and centrists are now looking for a solution to the culture war – our law – the One Law – solves that problem AND solve the problem of restoring the westMar 16, 2019, 9:00 PMBill Joslin”radical” in political spheres is synonymous with revolutionary – not outlierMar 16, 2019, 9:01 PMBill JoslinSo centrists willing to fight for a central position are radical centrists. And the list above are centrists which are fighting in the media sphere and argumentationMar 16, 2019, 9:02 PMSteven KolpekJason Murphy What is a Centrist in an Anarchy Scenario?Mar 16, 2019, 9:06 PMAlan MaupinDon’t understand whatever it is you’re saying.

    But, if you’ve got a “solution for western civilization’s problems” … Please, Do Tell!Mar 16, 2019, 9:12 PMJason MurphyDead? IdkMar 16, 2019, 9:18 PMMartin ŠtěpánJason Murphy I’m pretty sure it’s being used as an oxymoron. Centrists are seeing radicalization on both sides, explain it away with a horseshoe theory and satirically call their own position radical too.Mar 16, 2019, 9:22 PMJason MurphyThat actually makes senseMar 16, 2019, 9:22 PMMartin ŠtěpánOh boy, are you in for a treat.Mar 16, 2019, 9:23 PMAlan MaupinMartin Štěpán – Bring it!Mar 16, 2019, 9:42 PMVince Reecentrism isn’t a definable position. it’s simply the shifting mean of two active extremes.Mar 16, 2019, 9:50 PMCurtus MaximusAlan MaupinMar 16, 2019, 10:00 PMCurtus Maximushttps://youtu.be/hl2p3LW2i2IMar 16, 2019, 10:01 PMCurtus MaximusAlan Maupin Scientific GovernmentMar 16, 2019, 10:01 PMAlain DwightNow all we need is a catchy name like Propertarianism, testimonialism, or “the law”..Mar 16, 2019, 10:02 PMCurtus MaximusAlain Dwight NomocracyMar 16, 2019, 10:11 PMMichael D HaasWhat curt is describing is redpilling the mainstream voter and essentially taking them away from the elites who currently pacify them. What you are describing is the cop out made currently by the mainstream voterMar 16, 2019, 10:22 PMEdmund BlackadderWhere have you been?Mar 16, 2019, 10:35 PMJohn Kelly”Radical Centrism” is the guy that is ALWAYS breaking up the fight by getting in the middle instead of allowing the power surge to course correct the issueMar 17, 2019, 2:09 AMDan WarrenPivoting to the center is for the weak. Forcing the center to you is for the strong.Mar 17, 2019, 11:01 AMCurt Doolittlethen why do all the ‘strong’ fail?Mar 17, 2019, 11:08 AMJarrod MarmaTwo of three centrist groups I’m in recently shifted to the left because of older sympathies and new members (AnCap tankies, friends of admins (socialists), and UBI supporters) I was what was deemed a radical centrist when I trolled those groups. It was just simply justifying your right wing views with left wing ideology under the veil of irony. “Marx said we need to arm the populace” things like that. Otherwise I advocated for Classic Liberal policies or fucked around with ideas like People’s Democracy just to see if they would take in the group. It was pretty trying and I lost my patience a while back.

    Tl;dr, Radical Centrism is mostly trollingMar 17, 2019, 6:15 PMCaduceus MercuriusShooting in a tram in Utrecht (where I grew up), about an hour ago. Several injuries. Several people injured, Curt.

    https://www.rt.com/news/454104-utrecht-shooting-victims-police/Mar 18, 2019, 7:16 AMCaduceus MercuriusPossibly one dead.

    It happened one mile from where my brother and nephews live.Mar 18, 2019, 7:22 AMVincent HufkensCurrent situation depicted.Mar 18, 2019, 1:14 PMJon ZotzCan’t wait for the violence, i have things to do.Mar 18, 2019, 11:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 20:21:00 UTC