Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Reported Hate Speech

    Reported Hate Speech

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 00:46:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108892783799140353

    Reply addressees: @JamesFurten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108884684350599169

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108884684350599169

  • “Isn’t it weird that people who are “oppressed” by you have the legal right and

    —“Isn’t it weird that people who are “oppressed” by you have the legal right and the burning desire to always be in close proximity to you?”—Fred McCarty

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 00:25:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108887357296533504

  • “Isn’t it weird that people who are “oppressed” by you have the legal right and

    —“Isn’t it weird that people who are “oppressed” by you have the legal right and the burning desire to always be in close proximity to you?”—Fred McCarty

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 20:25:00 UTC

  • RT @DegenRolf: Moral emotions constitute the most inflammable matter on social m

    RT @DegenRolf: Moral emotions constitute the most inflammable matter on social media, and they are largely expressed for reputation-buildin…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 00:57:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108533083630903296

  • ANOTHER EXPERIENCE WITH LIFE AFTER PROPERTARIANISM. by Benjamin Wood I’ve experi

    ANOTHER EXPERIENCE WITH LIFE AFTER PROPERTARIANISM.

    by Benjamin Wood

    I’ve experienced greater awareness of people negotiating in bad faith, consciously or otherwise.

    One that immediately comes to mind is a person in my family who tends to frame their preferences in terms of universals: “Women don’t like it when you do X.” Or, “If you want people to put up with you, you can’t do Y.”

    I don’t think it’s deliberate so much as a subconscious rhetorical attempt to add more weight to their preferences or put a buffer between them and potential rejection…if I shut them down, it’s not me shutting *them* down, it’s me shutting *everyone* down. I actually think it flows from insecurity / lack of agency.

    I asked them to stop doing this and to put their preferences into more honest, testimonial language so that we could build a genuine relationship.

    Not only did they grasp the request, they appear to feel more confident as they take ownership of their desires in dialogue.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 13:29:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/pj-gladnick/2019/03/18/ted-koppel-trump-not-mistaken-about-biased-liberal-mediahttps://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/pj-gladnick/2019/03/18/ted-koppel-trump-not-mistaken-about-biased-liberal-media

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 18:16:00 UTC

  • “Patience implies a delay. Most ‘intellectuals’ are not waiting, they are hiding

    —“Patience implies a delay. Most ‘intellectuals’ are not waiting, they are hiding.”— Vengefül Bobmoran

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:13:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108023805652422658

  • “For the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patient

    —“For the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patiently suffer the etiquette of degenerates and fools.”— Chris Tangemann

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 14:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108008812856967169

  • BETTER THAN I COULD HAVE SAID IT by Brandon Hayes I’m under the impression and u

    BETTER THAN I COULD HAVE SAID IT

    by Brandon Hayes

    I’m under the impression and understand the beauty of P to be this: by removing personal subjectivity (asymmetric preference) from human interaction [by subjecting it to P law; replacing it with calculation] Emotions and meaning are properly solved for (via the best plausible outcome). This is because P solves for the optimal interaction (cooperation; reciprocity).

    P says (calculates, proves) what’s false (wrong); thus to be avoided OR bad (immoral unethical) to be punished (or left undone). By, removing, punishing and limiting the bad. ALL possibilities to GOOD are opened [and taken more often as we close doors to the “bad”].

    It leaves preference and decisions about pursuits to HUMANS (hence P can’t be done by AI and is resistant to take-over). Only humans can make the calculations P suggests.

    People seem to think P must say more than it does about the way things are or ought to be; but the brilliance of P is its parsimony.

    — CURTD —

    Correct. And this is the problem i face, the law faces, and science faces. We say only that which is false. It is up to those others to decide, from that options remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE. So for those with great psychological, emotional, intellectual, and material, agency for whom adaptation to any given ‘good’ is relatively easy does little for the vast majority for whom movement with a herd of similar interests is their only available means of survival.

    If I must PROPOSE a religious structure (I will do so) as a rough outline for others to create upon, then I will. But even doing that is merely ADVICE. That is different from math (measurement) science (falsification), and law (truth). The narrative will and must forever be a means of unifying behind an hypothesis of the good.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 11:24:00 UTC

  • “Patience implies a delay. Most ‘intellectuals’ are not waiting, they are hiding

    —“Patience implies a delay. Most ‘intellectuals’ are not waiting, they are hiding.”— Vengefül Bobmoran

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 11:13:00 UTC