The Effect of P-Cognates on the normie mind.Updated Feb 25, 2020, 2:05 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 14:05:00 UTC
The Effect of P-Cognates on the normie mind.Updated Feb 25, 2020, 2:05 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 14:05:00 UTC
Abrahamism as Lying to Distract from Evolutionary Denialism https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/abrahamism-as-lying-to-distract-from-evolutionary-denialism/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 14:01:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232304502679752704
by Martin Štěpán and Curt Doolittle [S]tephen J Gould was posing as an evolutionary biologist where in reality, he was an evolutionary denialist. Liars all: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr. These people are all evolutionary denialists. Every single one of them. That’s what separates them from the european intellectual tradition, and why they were wrong about everything. Why do you think they evolved at the same time as Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzsche? Why do you think you have control over the lies your telling now, or that any of these people had control over the lies they were telling? In order to prevent falsehood, we categorize lying as not trying to lie, but as not performing due diligence against lying. If you try to justify a prior – you’re lying. What science did these people do: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr. The scientific method exists to stop you from a justifying a prior, a cognitive bias – or a group’s mythology. They didn’t do any science. They made it up. Abrahamism = Evolutionary Denialism. Why?
Curt Doolittle Martin Štěpán this segue of yours sort of completes the picture as the female strategy against evolutionary reality. I mean in the end that’s what it’s all reducible to – evolutionary denialism.
Bill Joslin the incentive towit, raising children that may or may not be evolutionarily viable i.e. compensate for thoughts of infanticide and or, protect malinvestment
by Martin Štěpán and Curt Doolittle [S]tephen J Gould was posing as an evolutionary biologist where in reality, he was an evolutionary denialist. Liars all: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr. These people are all evolutionary denialists. Every single one of them. That’s what separates them from the european intellectual tradition, and why they were wrong about everything. Why do you think they evolved at the same time as Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzsche? Why do you think you have control over the lies your telling now, or that any of these people had control over the lies they were telling? In order to prevent falsehood, we categorize lying as not trying to lie, but as not performing due diligence against lying. If you try to justify a prior – you’re lying. What science did these people do: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr. The scientific method exists to stop you from a justifying a prior, a cognitive bias – or a group’s mythology. They didn’t do any science. They made it up. Abrahamism = Evolutionary Denialism. Why?
Curt Doolittle Martin Štěpán this segue of yours sort of completes the picture as the female strategy against evolutionary reality. I mean in the end that’s what it’s all reducible to – evolutionary denialism.
Bill Joslin the incentive towit, raising children that may or may not be evolutionarily viable i.e. compensate for thoughts of infanticide and or, protect malinvestment
The Aristotelian – reason proper
The Confucian – reasonableness
The Vedic (author lost) – myth
The Zoroastrian – the ideal
The Abrahamic – the great deceit
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 10:25:00 UTC
He doesn’t debunk anything.
The question is whether it’s an intentional conspiracy or the continuation of the abrahamic tradition of undermining without conscious conspiracy.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 01:55:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232121915592060928
Reply addressees: @WinslowFrancke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232121394328109057
And not proposing an alternate framework that is open to equal criticism.
Followed by Derrida’s social construction, undermining of truth itself, and then Alinsky’s method.
I know you aren’t informed enough to hold this discussion or you would state a canned response. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 01:54:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232121716614270976
Reply addressees: @WinslowFrancke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232121237863792645
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@WinslowFrancke The shift from generating class conflict to undermining the civilization’s foundations – family, religion, institutions, and truth.
But again, the application of sophistry, ‘critique’, pseudoscience, and ‘making it up’, in order to undermine host civilizations.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1232121237863792645
The Jewish counter-enlightenment by Marxism, Cultural Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, and Human-biodiversity-denialism today, is a repeat of the Jewish counter enlightenment of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam In the ancient world – and bringing about a second dark age.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 01:29:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232115459333468160
Reply addressees: @WinslowFrancke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232114896403410944
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@WinslowFrancke Just because something is unpleasant doesn’t mean its false.
Nietzsche, Menger, Darwin, Hume, Galileo, Machiavelli, Aristotle, Socrates – all faced the same problem.
If it’s true, it’s true.
No more lies.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1232114896403410944
Oh, and you never make a typo, right?
Oh, and you never intentionally misrepresent other’s words, right?
Don’t advertise intellectual dishonesty.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 01:00:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232108055338377216
Reply addressees: @socflyny
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232077025785020416

You know, if you had an argument you would make one. But GSRRM is evidence that you don’t. It just means you’re a dishonest ignorant moron. There is no extant argument against my work other than “ouch that’s as unpleasant as darwinian evolution was.”) https://t.co/jBVWP0uDW9

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 00:22:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232098550189821952
Reply addressees: @WinslowFrancke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232085384558972929