Postmodernism is just lying. Its nothing more than sophistry. it’s abrahamic theology in secular prose.
That’s what I work on. Group differences in evolutionary strategy and the “Grammars”: paradigms and logic by which different groups persist their group evolutionary strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:01:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232380104715751427
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232379621330558976
|Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging -> Shrilling -> ShriekingShrilling : hbd science-denialism, feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism. shrill (n.) 1a: having or emitting a sharp high-pitched tone or sound 1b: accompanied by sharp high-pitched sounds or cries 2: having a sharp or vivid effect on the senses 3: PIERCING, STRIDENT, INTEMPERATE shrew, shrewish (adj.) “peevish, malignant, clamorous, spiteful, vexatious, turbulent woman” [Johnson] is late 14c., from earlier sense of “spiteful person” (male or female), mid-13c.,late 14c., “wicked, malignant,” from shrew + -ish. Of women, “malignant and scolding,” from 1560s. Related: Shrewishly; shrewishness. scold (n.) mid-12c., “person of ribald speech,” later “person fond of abusive language” (c. 1300), especially a shrewish woman [Johnson defines it as “A clamourous, rude, mean, low, foul-mouthed woman”], from Old Norse skald “poet” (see skald). The sense evolution might reflect the fact that Germanic poets (like their Celtic counterparts) were famously feared for their ability to lampoon and mock (as in skaldskapr “poetry,” also, in Icelandic law books, “libel in verse”).
|Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging -> Shrilling -> ShriekingShrilling : hbd science-denialism, feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism. shrill (n.) 1a: having or emitting a sharp high-pitched tone or sound 1b: accompanied by sharp high-pitched sounds or cries 2: having a sharp or vivid effect on the senses 3: PIERCING, STRIDENT, INTEMPERATE shrew, shrewish (adj.) “peevish, malignant, clamorous, spiteful, vexatious, turbulent woman” [Johnson] is late 14c., from earlier sense of “spiteful person” (male or female), mid-13c.,late 14c., “wicked, malignant,” from shrew + -ish. Of women, “malignant and scolding,” from 1560s. Related: Shrewishly; shrewishness. scold (n.) mid-12c., “person of ribald speech,” later “person fond of abusive language” (c. 1300), especially a shrewish woman [Johnson defines it as “A clamourous, rude, mean, low, foul-mouthed woman”], from Old Norse skald “poet” (see skald). The sense evolution might reflect the fact that Germanic poets (like their Celtic counterparts) were famously feared for their ability to lampoon and mock (as in skaldskapr “poetry,” also, in Icelandic law books, “libel in verse”).
Art is perhaps the most effete and elegant path by which to study the evolution of man – writers lie like hell because authoring like gossip is cheap. Arts are costly. Architecture especially, and all arts evolve to decorate architecture. (ie: the decline in architecture and art)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 15:47:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232331247864643585
Reply addressees: @ubermensch11111 @NISquadron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232330663879159808
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ubermensch11111 @NISquadron I find education pedantic? Infantile? Like most autodidacts, I prefer self study. Only fine art was deeply interesting. Although I should have gone into the literature or philosophy departments when they asked me. I was too immature to understand what being asked meant.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1232330663879159808
—“The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.”—Chris Moyer
Yes. christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism and neoconservatism are all baiting into hazard – so are freudianism, boasianism, cultural marxism, political correctness, and human-biodiversity-denialism. Europeans speak in the language of the gods written in the hands of the gods, math, science, natural law, and testimony. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the demon tell us? The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. We know the name of the devil.His name was Abraham.He was from Ur.
—“The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.”—Chris Moyer
Yes. christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism and neoconservatism are all baiting into hazard – so are freudianism, boasianism, cultural marxism, political correctness, and human-biodiversity-denialism. Europeans speak in the language of the gods written in the hands of the gods, math, science, natural law, and testimony. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the demon tell us? The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. We know the name of the devil.His name was Abraham.He was from Ur.
The Deal with The Devil – False Mindfulness https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/the-deal-with-the-devil-false-mindfulness/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 14:06:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232305915740684288
“[T]he Smith and the Devil” may be one of the oldest European folk tales, with the basic plot stable throughout the Indo-European speaking world from India to Scandinavia, possibly being first told in Indo-European 6,000 years ago in the Bronze Age. A blacksmith strikes a deal with a malevolent supernatural being, such as the Devil, Death or a genie. The blacksmith exchanges his soul for the power to weld any materials together. He then uses this power to stick the devil to an immovable object, such as a tree, to renege on his side of the bargain. In Faust, the protagonist is highly successful yet dissatisfied with his life, which leads him to make a pact with the Devil at a crossroads, exchanging his soul for unlimited knowledge and worldly pleasures. Faust is irrevocably damned One may not have mindfulness by making a bargain with a devil in god’s dress. This basic plot is stable throughout the Indo-European speaking world, from India to Scandinavia, according to the research. The study said this tale could be traced back to the Proto-Indo-European society when metallurgy likely existed and there was archaeological and genetic evidence of massive territorial expansions by nomadic tribes from the Pontic steppe (the northern shores of the Black Sea) between 5,000 and 6,000 years ago.
“[T]he Smith and the Devil” may be one of the oldest European folk tales, with the basic plot stable throughout the Indo-European speaking world from India to Scandinavia, possibly being first told in Indo-European 6,000 years ago in the Bronze Age. A blacksmith strikes a deal with a malevolent supernatural being, such as the Devil, Death or a genie. The blacksmith exchanges his soul for the power to weld any materials together. He then uses this power to stick the devil to an immovable object, such as a tree, to renege on his side of the bargain. In Faust, the protagonist is highly successful yet dissatisfied with his life, which leads him to make a pact with the Devil at a crossroads, exchanging his soul for unlimited knowledge and worldly pleasures. Faust is irrevocably damned One may not have mindfulness by making a bargain with a devil in god’s dress. This basic plot is stable throughout the Indo-European speaking world, from India to Scandinavia, according to the research. The study said this tale could be traced back to the Proto-Indo-European society when metallurgy likely existed and there was archaeological and genetic evidence of massive territorial expansions by nomadic tribes from the Pontic steppe (the northern shores of the Black Sea) between 5,000 and 6,000 years ago.
“Libertarians Are Welfare Queens” https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/libertarians-are-welfare-queens/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 14:05:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232305723708706818