[W]oman is on ride-sharing site with fellow employees. Guy propositions her. She rejects it. This is somehow ‘sexual harassment’ since according to women, only women should initiate seduction, because they are not adult enough to reject it. She reports it to HR. HR says ‘it’s his first offense, he’s a high performer (and you are not) so either stay on his team and deal with it, or move to another team’. This is the correct solution to the problem when dealing with a high performer and a low performer. You move the lower performer. Instead she plays victim, does not act in the company interest, and acts instead in her own interest, and rallies other women to HR with her. HR says it is his first offense because it’s the first offense we have record of. And we have more people complaining about YOU. Women feels she is self righteously due, so continues, writes blog, and undermines company’s competitive male culture of ‘stepping on toes to do what’s right’. This is why it is important to (a) have recruiting, benefits, payroll, and legal departments but NOT HR departments who are universally agents of undermining organizations by politicking – and force people to legal recourse outside the business. (b) this is why high performing companies should be very cautious about hiring women until the naturally destructive nature of women can be tolerated by scale. Sexual harassment is an obvious thing. Unwanted advancement is not sexual harassment. It’s just human. Why don’t we teach women how to reject men, and that men must respect it and not retaliate when rejected – rather than all these layers of deceit and destruction.
Theme: Deception
-
But intellectual consistency violates social construction and as such is not onl
But intellectual consistency violates social construction and as such is not only unnecessary but indesirable for the left.
For the left desirable=true, and undesirable=false
For the right true=true and false=false
For the faithful compliance=true and non-compliance=false.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 18:31:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232734880045420545
Reply addressees: @CrusaderSvcs
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232734430185299970
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@CrusaderSvcs Well. The canon is rather obvious nonsense that fundamentalists cannot seem to get past. The question of Deism remains possible and Physical and Natural laws eradicate conflict. The left both uses Darwin against the religious right, and denies Darwin against the scientific right.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1232734430185299970
-
This is the answer you know. All political conflict is reducible to this one que
This is the answer you know.
All political conflict is reducible to this one question.
The entirety of the left’s spectrum of ideology serves only to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction.
LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary
The left denies evolutionary pressure and necessity exists.
-vs-
RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary.
The right only debates its cause: intent rather than accident.
This is why the right is ‘right’.
Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 18:08:00 UTC
-
Postmodernism is one of the counter-enlightenments against science and reason. I
Postmodernism is one of the counter-enlightenments against science and reason. It’s the most successful because it’s the purest form of sophistry yet: social construction by sophistry without dependence on theology.
#Conservatives #Republican @realDonaldTrump
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 15:01:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232682000273825792
-
Feb 26, 2020, 2:56 PM
https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Antisemitism/1-in-5-Europeans-says-secret-Jewish-cabal-runs-the-world-survey-finds-618830https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Antisemitism/1-in-5-Europeans-says-secret-Jewish-cabal-runs-the-world-survey-finds-618830Updated Feb 26, 2020, 2:56 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 14:56:00 UTC
-
Truth isn’t manipulation. It’s either information or it’s discipline.
—“Concerted, organized effort to shame western people into a pattern where were easily manipulated.” Like EXACTLY like what YOU do? You do realize that you perpetrate literally EVERY part of this against women. Of course you do, you’ve just found a way to capitalize on it.”— Crazy Woman
Truth isn’t manipulation. it’s prevention of manipulation. 😉 If we force truth then we can engage in trade. If you don’t want to trade and you want to preserve manipulation then why shouldn’t we conquer and enserf you? We certainly can. Easily. You are using GSRRM in your post (you’re probably mentally ill or mentally underdeveloped). Around 40% of women are mentally ill. We are just getting our arms around why that is. We aren’t sure yet. If you were an intellectually honest, mentally stable, and engaged in reciprocity (seeking exchanges), then you would simply say ‘Yes this is true, but what can we do about it?” You didn’t do that. Because you are a bad person.
-
Truth isn’t manipulation. It’s either information or it’s discipline.
—“Concerted, organized effort to shame western people into a pattern where were easily manipulated.” Like EXACTLY like what YOU do? You do realize that you perpetrate literally EVERY part of this against women. Of course you do, you’ve just found a way to capitalize on it.”— Crazy Woman
Truth isn’t manipulation. it’s prevention of manipulation. 😉 If we force truth then we can engage in trade. If you don’t want to trade and you want to preserve manipulation then why shouldn’t we conquer and enserf you? We certainly can. Easily. You are using GSRRM in your post (you’re probably mentally ill or mentally underdeveloped). Around 40% of women are mentally ill. We are just getting our arms around why that is. We aren’t sure yet. If you were an intellectually honest, mentally stable, and engaged in reciprocity (seeking exchanges), then you would simply say ‘Yes this is true, but what can we do about it?” You didn’t do that. Because you are a bad person.
-
“The Case Against Reality” No. The Case for Woo Woo Pseudoscience
“The Case Against Reality” No. The Case for Woo Woo Pseudoscience. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/the-case-against-reality-no-the-case-for-woo-woo-pseudoscience/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 21:26:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232416681919729666
-
“The Case Against Reality” No. The Case for Woo Woo Pseudoscience.
“The Case Against Reality” The case for woo woo pseudoscience. This is pseudoscientific nonsense. We see actionable reality at actionable scale, using some pretty amazing instrumentation. We ‘predict’ (imagine consequences from) our model of the world, that is not real. That’s simply a lack of discipline. I can and have, and others can and have, explained consciousness – and with recent work it’s not even complicated. I’d like to see the ‘math’ he’s talking about because I’m pretty sure he’s hand-waving. He’s using Truth as an undefined ‘woo woo’ term (hand waving). A fitness payoff (more correctly, return on cost of continuous production) An organism that sees the world as it is (processes unnecessary information) that models the world independent of it’s capacity for action will be out-competed by an organism that reduces the world model necessary for action to the minimum necessary for action, and just competes on what works regardless of any model of the world. Well, this is only true to the point at which organisms can voluntarily cooperate – because there are no competitors to return on cooperation. The camera obscura, and the camera, are a purely physical thing without consciousness. Yet we see what the camera records, without manipulating it. Sure, we can’t see all the same colors. Some of us see more than others. But that’s a difference in resolution of color not a difference in any ‘truth’ we see. “Space and time don’t exist independent of our perception.” Well that’s demonstrably false. Space and time are vocabulary we use to describe what we perceive through sensory information. “There are other consciousnesses out there”. OMG…. I would eat these morons for lunch. https://youtu.be/dd6CQCbk2ro
-
So it’s not a matter of opinion. The composition of postmodernism is just the su
So it’s not a matter of opinion. The composition of postmodernism is just the successful achievement after a sequence of failures to create religion of dysgenic groups by which social construction can be produced without appeal to the supernatural.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:02:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232380358190157831
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232379621330558976