Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception

    All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/all-naxalt-arguments-are-attempts-at-deception/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:33:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264655730910670849

  • All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception.

    Feb 2, 2020, 11:21 AM

    All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

  • All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception.

    Feb 2, 2020, 11:21 AM

    All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

  • Simple people need lies and social construction to reinforce them in order to se

    Simple people need lies and social construction to reinforce them in order to sedate their neuroticism from the pressures of low status and low agency – providing the illusion of understanding and control. It is sufficient for them, just as fairy tales are for children.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 14:22:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264562502597324801

    Reply addressees: @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264539803770593286

  • Christianity is the religion of false promise, ignorance, deceit, manipulation,

    Christianity is the religion of false promise, ignorance, deceit, manipulation, enserfment, poverty, and the dark ages, that asks women, slaves, and the weak, to submit to a false god, of an alien people, who produced nothing except lies, usury, rent seeking, and organized crime.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 13:11:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264544600418631681

    Reply addressees: @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264541231641694209

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf We are the only gods that may yet be. And in the test of civilizations,only western man discovered the laws of the universe and adapted their civilization to mirror them. If there were gods, europeans would be the chosen people, aristotle their prophet, and truth their scripture.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1264541231641694209

  • Cancel Culture (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and difference-de

    Cancel Culture (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and difference-denialism) are just christianity v2: undermining meritocracy, reason, evidence, and testimony by replacing the false promise of life after death with the false promise of equality after replacement.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 12:49:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264539027425955841

    Reply addressees: @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264534819305861121

  • Most Common Lie in Genetics: More Similar than Not

    Most Common Lie in Genetics: More Similar than Not https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/most-common-lie-in-genetics-more-similar-than-not/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 07:14:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264454640025960449

  • Most Common Lie in Genetics: More Similar than Not

    Feb 3, 2020, 12:26 PM

    —“More similar than different can be said about us and chimps”–Göran Dahl

    When discussing genetics “more similar than different’ is a pseudoscientific, and pseudo-mathematical lie. There is even a name for it: “Lewontin’s Fallacy”. Or we can just call it postmodern denialism and igorance. Any of those labels will do. Very minor changes appear to have very vast consequences and some groups have accumulated better minor changes and others worse minor changes (genetic load). Same is true for rate of calculation of adaption. The rate of adaption depends largely on the number of life forms, the life span, the frequency of generations, the environmental pressures of a given locality, the available means of expressing fitness, the possibility of non local reproduction(travelled); the complexity of the life form(size of the information), the expressed population of the genome, whether it’s RNA(adaptive) or DNA(error checking), asexual or sexual, and the number of points in the replication process that errors can insert, delete, and survive, and some factors we don’t clearly understand yet, that facilitate or inhibit those changes and rates of change. DNA(RNA) is a supercomputer that works at chemical rather than electrical velocity. There are say, 5m SNP’s (blocks, instructions) and that is not all that can change – in an individuals genome, and 100m active SNPs worldwide. Edit

  • Most Common Lie in Genetics: More Similar than Not

    Feb 3, 2020, 12:26 PM

    —“More similar than different can be said about us and chimps”–Göran Dahl

    When discussing genetics “more similar than different’ is a pseudoscientific, and pseudo-mathematical lie. There is even a name for it: “Lewontin’s Fallacy”. Or we can just call it postmodern denialism and igorance. Any of those labels will do. Very minor changes appear to have very vast consequences and some groups have accumulated better minor changes and others worse minor changes (genetic load). Same is true for rate of calculation of adaption. The rate of adaption depends largely on the number of life forms, the life span, the frequency of generations, the environmental pressures of a given locality, the available means of expressing fitness, the possibility of non local reproduction(travelled); the complexity of the life form(size of the information), the expressed population of the genome, whether it’s RNA(adaptive) or DNA(error checking), asexual or sexual, and the number of points in the replication process that errors can insert, delete, and survive, and some factors we don’t clearly understand yet, that facilitate or inhibit those changes and rates of change. DNA(RNA) is a supercomputer that works at chemical rather than electrical velocity. There are say, 5m SNP’s (blocks, instructions) and that is not all that can change – in an individuals genome, and 100m active SNPs worldwide. Edit

  • Name Calling Doolittle Number 9999999999….

    Feb 3, 2020, 3:33 PM

    —“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend

    (re: doolittle) ….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic

    LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents… I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues. So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy. If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops. If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP. But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations. Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews. And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.) So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.’