Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Has the Internet Made a Difference in Threat Perception?

    Jan 30, 2020, 11:01 AM

    —“Is anything different now — or has the internet just made us more AWARE of how the left rolls? For instance … if we were to apply our current knowledge of history to the standard history textbook of the 1980s, we would say “this is intolerable.” Or if we applied current understanding of inter-sexual dynamics to the dating marketplace of the 1990s (peak friendzone) we would say “this is intolerable.”—Michael Churchill

    Great question. A three part answer (a) yes we are more aware (b) we cannot threaten, argue with, silence, or exit them – because our interpersonal physicality and genetic status is invisible and inaccessible on the web – so GSRRM is more effective than physicality (c) yes they are a greater threat demographically because they think they can win (caused by obama)

  • Jan 30, 2020, 7:51 PM —“Seems like” insinuates an association (bad or good, bu

    Jan 30, 2020, 7:51 PM

    —“Seems like” insinuates an association (bad or good, but usually bad) without putting forth any capital or reliable information to back your claim. The classic “I don’t really know, but I think I know, ya know?”–Zack Passmore

    (It’s an attempt to undermine without warrantying your words.)

  • Jan 30, 2020, 7:51 PM —“Seems like” insinuates an association (bad or good, bu

    Jan 30, 2020, 7:51 PM

    —“Seems like” insinuates an association (bad or good, but usually bad) without putting forth any capital or reliable information to back your claim. The classic “I don’t really know, but I think I know, ya know?”–Zack Passmore

    (It’s an attempt to undermine without warrantying your words.)

  • GSRRM Is Almost Always an Attempt to Obscure a Theft

    GSRRM Is Almost Always an Attempt to Obscure a Theft https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/gsrrm-is-almost-always-an-attempt-to-obscure-a-theft/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 15:24:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264940513498718208

  • GSRRM Is Almost Always an Attempt to Obscure a Theft

    Jan 31, 2020, 8:13 AM

    —“Why are leftists so keen to brand you as a racist or supremacist?”— (interviewer to Charles Murray)

    Well, why to murderers, thieves, frauds, free riders, parasites, the conspiratorial, corrupt, converters, invaders, justify their thefts? It’s a dumb question. Always ask who is stealing what and that tells you the answer.

  • GSRRM Is Almost Always an Attempt to Obscure a Theft

    Jan 31, 2020, 8:13 AM

    —“Why are leftists so keen to brand you as a racist or supremacist?”— (interviewer to Charles Murray)

    Well, why to murderers, thieves, frauds, free riders, parasites, the conspiratorial, corrupt, converters, invaders, justify their thefts? It’s a dumb question. Always ask who is stealing what and that tells you the answer.

  • Christian Pseudoscience: Electric Universe and Langan’s Cognitive-Theoretic Model

    Feb 1, 2020, 9:42 AM Each is another ridiculous pseudoscience – it’s just christian biased pseudoscience vs jewish biased pseudoscience(marx, freud, cantor, boas, bohr, derrida, friedan, etc). Every culture has tried some version of pseudoscience or sophistry to persist it’s traditional model of the universe. But, no pseudoscience pls. We know the laws of the universe. We have at least one problem left and I am pretty sure we will have to solve it by computational trial and error like protein folding. We may or may not ever know how many universes there are, and how they emerge, but within this universe we are going to know relatively shortly as much about the physical and biological as we do about the atomic and chemical. The only thing I put forward is that these same laws apply to man’s behavior, and that memory provides an accounting system that allows us to cooperate by trade of debts and credits in time. If there are gods, they have written their laws in the universe for all of us to see. The rest of history is full of men who lied or told half truths about those laws. And there appears to be no means by which for any god to influence us, other than as stories in the minds of others. This is where science leads. This is why some people need faith. Because they cannot bear the truth. And we must not deprive people of their means of sedation. On the other hand we may not permit them to influence the material world with their sedatives.

  • Christian Pseudoscience: Electric Universe and Langan’s Cognitive-Theoretic Model

    Feb 1, 2020, 9:42 AM Each is another ridiculous pseudoscience – it’s just christian biased pseudoscience vs jewish biased pseudoscience(marx, freud, cantor, boas, bohr, derrida, friedan, etc). Every culture has tried some version of pseudoscience or sophistry to persist it’s traditional model of the universe. But, no pseudoscience pls. We know the laws of the universe. We have at least one problem left and I am pretty sure we will have to solve it by computational trial and error like protein folding. We may or may not ever know how many universes there are, and how they emerge, but within this universe we are going to know relatively shortly as much about the physical and biological as we do about the atomic and chemical. The only thing I put forward is that these same laws apply to man’s behavior, and that memory provides an accounting system that allows us to cooperate by trade of debts and credits in time. If there are gods, they have written their laws in the universe for all of us to see. The rest of history is full of men who lied or told half truths about those laws. And there appears to be no means by which for any god to influence us, other than as stories in the minds of others. This is where science leads. This is why some people need faith. Because they cannot bear the truth. And we must not deprive people of their means of sedation. On the other hand we may not permit them to influence the material world with their sedatives.

  • Threat Perception in Internet Age

    Feb 1, 2020, 8:43 PM by Bill Joslin I think the threat detection issue spans the entire political, soci-economic bell curve. i think think this stems from “threat signal saturation”. I suspect threat saturation disrupts friend foe identification. friend foe identification expresses differently across the bell curves – The left has an inverted identification – where in-group competitive drives supersede predator proximity drives. And the right has an amplified “err on the side of false positives” where proximity sensitivity becomes applied to friends. In both cases this results in a positive feedback loop which exacerbates the problem. We live with a nightmarish degree of anomie – social instability resulting from a breakdown of standards and values. In rat utopia, normie rats in proximity to the beautiful ones display this behavior – obsessive territorial marking – because they lose the ability to tell the difference from fellow colony marking from adversarial markings.

  • Threat Perception in Internet Age

    Feb 1, 2020, 8:43 PM by Bill Joslin I think the threat detection issue spans the entire political, soci-economic bell curve. i think think this stems from “threat signal saturation”. I suspect threat saturation disrupts friend foe identification. friend foe identification expresses differently across the bell curves – The left has an inverted identification – where in-group competitive drives supersede predator proximity drives. And the right has an amplified “err on the side of false positives” where proximity sensitivity becomes applied to friends. In both cases this results in a positive feedback loop which exacerbates the problem. We live with a nightmarish degree of anomie – social instability resulting from a breakdown of standards and values. In rat utopia, normie rats in proximity to the beautiful ones display this behavior – obsessive territorial marking – because they lose the ability to tell the difference from fellow colony marking from adversarial markings.