Theme: Deception

  • Because They Want to Fall for It.

    Jan 23, 2020, 8:55 AM

    —“What I don’t get is why anyone falls for the false promise? A little thought reveals there definitions do not correspond with reality. It’s probably some remnant of Biblical hermeneutics. Or the educational shift away from the Trivium (fundamentals of critical thinking).”—Andrew M Gilmour

    WHY DO THEY FALL FOR THE FALSE PROMISE?  BECAUSE THEY WANT TO FALL FOR IT.

  • It”s Not Christianity Its how Its Argued

    Jan 26, 2020, 12:30 PM

    —“Has anyone ever noticed that it isn’t Christianity that is the problem? But the Marxist infection of X. It’s the cancer that high trust cultures are prone to. … Yeah, wrong subtopic. It’s hard to say, because Abrahamic religions seem to want to be, at least start out as high trust but quickly degenerated by something power hungry, and/or angry at a slight.”—Anne Summers —“Yes. the problem is xianity is conveyed by the same method so how can we get rid of the marxist axis without it affecting xianity unless we convert xianity to secular scientific terms?”—CurtD —“It’s hard to say whether Christianity is salvageable. God did not try to salvage either paganism or Judaism. There is no telling what the next covenant will be. It’s like trying to read the early parts of the “Voluspa” and trying to decide which gods will survive. Or reading the OT and trying to figure out what God has in store. The Owl of Minerva spreads its wings only at dusk.”—Don Miguel

    Neolithic European Farmers ……………> Pre-Germanic Nordic ……………> Megalithic Atlantic ……………> Central? Aryanism (Sky Father, Sun God) ………..> East ……………> Indo Iranian > Zoroastrianism >… ……………> Indo Indian > Hinduism > Buddhism ………..> West ……………> North: ?? > Germanic Thor > Germanic Odinism ……………> Central: Germanic Celtic ……………> South: Greco-Latin-Roman Judaism > ……………> Christianity > Protestantism > American Xianity ……………> Islam > Islamic Fundamentalism. ………….. > Marxism > cultural Marxism > Postmodernism > anti-western feminism > Political Correctness > Denialism

  • It”s Not Christianity Its how Its Argued

    Jan 26, 2020, 12:30 PM

    —“Has anyone ever noticed that it isn’t Christianity that is the problem? But the Marxist infection of X. It’s the cancer that high trust cultures are prone to. … Yeah, wrong subtopic. It’s hard to say, because Abrahamic religions seem to want to be, at least start out as high trust but quickly degenerated by something power hungry, and/or angry at a slight.”—Anne Summers —“Yes. the problem is xianity is conveyed by the same method so how can we get rid of the marxist axis without it affecting xianity unless we convert xianity to secular scientific terms?”—CurtD —“It’s hard to say whether Christianity is salvageable. God did not try to salvage either paganism or Judaism. There is no telling what the next covenant will be. It’s like trying to read the early parts of the “Voluspa” and trying to decide which gods will survive. Or reading the OT and trying to figure out what God has in store. The Owl of Minerva spreads its wings only at dusk.”—Don Miguel

    Neolithic European Farmers ……………> Pre-Germanic Nordic ……………> Megalithic Atlantic ……………> Central? Aryanism (Sky Father, Sun God) ………..> East ……………> Indo Iranian > Zoroastrianism >… ……………> Indo Indian > Hinduism > Buddhism ………..> West ……………> North: ?? > Germanic Thor > Germanic Odinism ……………> Central: Germanic Celtic ……………> South: Greco-Latin-Roman Judaism > ……………> Christianity > Protestantism > American Xianity ……………> Islam > Islamic Fundamentalism. ………….. > Marxism > cultural Marxism > Postmodernism > anti-western feminism > Political Correctness > Denialism

  • GSRRM Is Also a The Tool of Psychopaths

    GSRRM Is Also a The Tool of Psychopaths https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/gsrrm-is-also-a-the-tool-of-psychopaths/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 17:57:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264979010095730688

  • GSRRM Is Also a The Tool of Psychopaths

    Jan 28, 2020, 1:03 PM by James Dmitro Makienko The tools listed in GRRSM and the extended version can be all described as being “a part of” female cognitive manipulation. These techniques are also common to sociopaths and narcissists. Techniques not mentioned include framing – “if you are X therefore you must do Y (baiting into hazard) which is not in your interest (no full disclosure of costs), but in the interest of manipulator (irreciprocity)” – example “If you are a christian you must accept transsexuals because of compassion and sermon-of-the-mount christ saying judge ye not…” Another technique is derailing the topic, so that you are not stating your point clearly and not arguing what you are saying and respond emotionally – and people don’t remember your point but remember that you’re an angry person who had a really long argument with someone. The response to that is to call out the manipulator on manipulation, and restate your point. And keep doing this over and over until they stop.


    (CD: ^Yep, state their technique, return to central argument, repeat, until you exhaust them.) Edit

  • GSRRM Is Also a The Tool of Psychopaths

    Jan 28, 2020, 1:03 PM by James Dmitro Makienko The tools listed in GRRSM and the extended version can be all described as being “a part of” female cognitive manipulation. These techniques are also common to sociopaths and narcissists. Techniques not mentioned include framing – “if you are X therefore you must do Y (baiting into hazard) which is not in your interest (no full disclosure of costs), but in the interest of manipulator (irreciprocity)” – example “If you are a christian you must accept transsexuals because of compassion and sermon-of-the-mount christ saying judge ye not…” Another technique is derailing the topic, so that you are not stating your point clearly and not arguing what you are saying and respond emotionally – and people don’t remember your point but remember that you’re an angry person who had a really long argument with someone. The response to that is to call out the manipulator on manipulation, and restate your point. And keep doing this over and over until they stop.


    (CD: ^Yep, state their technique, return to central argument, repeat, until you exhaust them.) Edit

  • SUMMARY: He Who Can Destroy a Thing, Controls a Thing. Truth is Enough

    Jan 28, 2020, 2:44 PM THE SERIES: GSRRM > PILPUL > SOPHISM > FALSE PROMISE CRITIQUE > ABRAHAMISM (important) (core) GSRRM is a form of avoidance by conflating disapproval with falsehood. It uses escalating means of shaming in order to achieve with disapproval what is true but they cannot tolerate. SOPHISM or PILPUL is a tool of distraction and deception. In general it relies on uses of GSRRM, Idealism (abstractions), plus loading, framing, suggesting, obscuring, to (a) create a paradigm (b) that overloads your reason (b) and uses suggestion (c) to force you to appeal to your intuition (d) thus causing you to substitute your value judgements (e) thus creating a false impression of agreement, when the speaker has the opposite intentions in mind: deceit. Why? All communication requires we listen to a series of symbols that suggest a story of anything from a name to an epic narrative. At some point we understand (synchronize) with the speaker, and then either we or the speaker or both perform due diligence to warranty that we do not misunderstand. Sophism uses this period of suggestibility to cause you to fill in the blanks with information that corresponds to what the speaker says, but not to reality or any future reality. These systems fool you into falsehood. FALSE PROMISE, or SEDUCTION to avoid a reciprocal trade. (repeat that a few times so you grasp it). A false promise or seduction so that you will pay a cost and the other party will not. FICTIONALISM improves on SOPHISM but relying on telling more complex stores that undermine and overload the limits of the three human cognitive faculties: 1) the physical, 2) the logical, and the 3) emotional. The three techniques are 1) the magic-pseudoscience physical spectrum – the domain of pseudoscience, 2) the ideal-surreal rational spectrum- the domain of philosophy and 3) the supernatural-occult emotional spectrum – the domain of theology. These systems of deception offer discounts (false promises) of truthfulness and comprehension. They bait you into falsehood. CRITIQUE is a form of undermining by GSRRM, SOPHISM, and FICTIONALISM and then pointing out imperfections, or straw manning imperfections that are not there, exaggerated, irrelevant or meaningless, and not providing a superior competitive solution that can be compared. These systems undermine competing truthfully stated systems of thought. BAITING INTO HAZARD is a form of profiting from the use of the above techniques to profit from others error, fault, or failure of your engineering. Seduction and Usury are the canon examples. ABRAHAMISM combines all, and adds baiting into hazard, with false and unwarranted or unwarrantable promise as a means of profiting from undermining the host polity. If you understand this, you will have given names to the techniques of the enemy. The adoption of the female strategy of undermining males.

    By use of GSRRM as a substitute for solutions – usually to avoid payment, bearing of cost, or engaging in exchange. By the use of SOPHISM as a substitute for argument and reason. By the use of FALSE PROMISE to avoid an exchange. By the use of FICTIONALISMS to create more elaborate false promises. By the use of Critique to Undermine existing or proposed solutions without offering one that is viable. By the use of Abrahamism to combine all of these into a strategy for undermining host civilizations.Judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken islam to destroy civilization and reduce it to dysgenic ignorance and poverty. Marxism to foster conflict between classes with a monopoly underclass. Postmodernism to foster conflict between science and fictionalisms – and to undermine western civilization by undermining truth merit and markets. Feminism to foster conflict between the genders and destroy the family. Politicalcorrectness to suppress the truth. The enemy wants control they cannot manage like females want control they cannot manage if they have it. They follow the intuition of the herd. Conversely, we live in packs (families). We want no one to have control. We build a civilization without control. We built a civilization of markets and the resulting uncertainty. And we find joy in it. And we rescued mankind from ignorance with it. Aristotelianism, Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Logic, Testimony(Truth), History, Economics, Natural Law, Technology, Science, Mathematics and the Natural Eugenics of Markets between the classes to evolve man into the gods europeans imagined, while reveling in our achievements all the way to the heavens we will create.He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.Truth is a weapon.It has always been our weapon.Take it from this forge.Wield it.Win.

  • SUMMARY: He Who Can Destroy a Thing, Controls a Thing. Truth is Enough

    Jan 28, 2020, 2:44 PM THE SERIES: GSRRM > PILPUL > SOPHISM > FALSE PROMISE CRITIQUE > ABRAHAMISM (important) (core) GSRRM is a form of avoidance by conflating disapproval with falsehood. It uses escalating means of shaming in order to achieve with disapproval what is true but they cannot tolerate. SOPHISM or PILPUL is a tool of distraction and deception. In general it relies on uses of GSRRM, Idealism (abstractions), plus loading, framing, suggesting, obscuring, to (a) create a paradigm (b) that overloads your reason (b) and uses suggestion (c) to force you to appeal to your intuition (d) thus causing you to substitute your value judgements (e) thus creating a false impression of agreement, when the speaker has the opposite intentions in mind: deceit. Why? All communication requires we listen to a series of symbols that suggest a story of anything from a name to an epic narrative. At some point we understand (synchronize) with the speaker, and then either we or the speaker or both perform due diligence to warranty that we do not misunderstand. Sophism uses this period of suggestibility to cause you to fill in the blanks with information that corresponds to what the speaker says, but not to reality or any future reality. These systems fool you into falsehood. FALSE PROMISE, or SEDUCTION to avoid a reciprocal trade. (repeat that a few times so you grasp it). A false promise or seduction so that you will pay a cost and the other party will not. FICTIONALISM improves on SOPHISM but relying on telling more complex stores that undermine and overload the limits of the three human cognitive faculties: 1) the physical, 2) the logical, and the 3) emotional. The three techniques are 1) the magic-pseudoscience physical spectrum – the domain of pseudoscience, 2) the ideal-surreal rational spectrum- the domain of philosophy and 3) the supernatural-occult emotional spectrum – the domain of theology. These systems of deception offer discounts (false promises) of truthfulness and comprehension. They bait you into falsehood. CRITIQUE is a form of undermining by GSRRM, SOPHISM, and FICTIONALISM and then pointing out imperfections, or straw manning imperfections that are not there, exaggerated, irrelevant or meaningless, and not providing a superior competitive solution that can be compared. These systems undermine competing truthfully stated systems of thought. BAITING INTO HAZARD is a form of profiting from the use of the above techniques to profit from others error, fault, or failure of your engineering. Seduction and Usury are the canon examples. ABRAHAMISM combines all, and adds baiting into hazard, with false and unwarranted or unwarrantable promise as a means of profiting from undermining the host polity. If you understand this, you will have given names to the techniques of the enemy. The adoption of the female strategy of undermining males.

    By use of GSRRM as a substitute for solutions – usually to avoid payment, bearing of cost, or engaging in exchange. By the use of SOPHISM as a substitute for argument and reason. By the use of FALSE PROMISE to avoid an exchange. By the use of FICTIONALISMS to create more elaborate false promises. By the use of Critique to Undermine existing or proposed solutions without offering one that is viable. By the use of Abrahamism to combine all of these into a strategy for undermining host civilizations.Judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken islam to destroy civilization and reduce it to dysgenic ignorance and poverty. Marxism to foster conflict between classes with a monopoly underclass. Postmodernism to foster conflict between science and fictionalisms – and to undermine western civilization by undermining truth merit and markets. Feminism to foster conflict between the genders and destroy the family. Politicalcorrectness to suppress the truth. The enemy wants control they cannot manage like females want control they cannot manage if they have it. They follow the intuition of the herd. Conversely, we live in packs (families). We want no one to have control. We build a civilization without control. We built a civilization of markets and the resulting uncertainty. And we find joy in it. And we rescued mankind from ignorance with it. Aristotelianism, Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Logic, Testimony(Truth), History, Economics, Natural Law, Technology, Science, Mathematics and the Natural Eugenics of Markets between the classes to evolve man into the gods europeans imagined, while reveling in our achievements all the way to the heavens we will create.He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.Truth is a weapon.It has always been our weapon.Take it from this forge.Wield it.Win.

  • BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT WRITING WAS “MAGIC” AND MUST KILL FOR IT

    BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT WRITING WAS “MAGIC” AND MUST KILL FOR IT https://t.co/ZjNBiK5uLS


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 16:26:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264956037016227840

    Reply addressees: @Asweetpoison1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264954716179529729

  • Has the Internet Made a Difference in Threat Perception?

    Jan 30, 2020, 11:01 AM

    —“Is anything different now — or has the internet just made us more AWARE of how the left rolls? For instance … if we were to apply our current knowledge of history to the standard history textbook of the 1980s, we would say “this is intolerable.” Or if we applied current understanding of inter-sexual dynamics to the dating marketplace of the 1990s (peak friendzone) we would say “this is intolerable.”—Michael Churchill

    Great question. A three part answer (a) yes we are more aware (b) we cannot threaten, argue with, silence, or exit them – because our interpersonal physicality and genetic status is invisible and inaccessible on the web – so GSRRM is more effective than physicality (c) yes they are a greater threat demographically because they think they can win (caused by obama)