Theme: Deception

  • Answers to The Sophisms of Abrahmists

    Nov 4, 2019, 7:25 PM “I never err. Truth is a gift of Our Old Gods of Europa for me to use for Our People In our War against the Evil Gods and their People who lie.”

    —“Christianity survived and encouraged the development of local and regional European identities for centuries. Yet somehow the West only became vulnerable as a result of post-war secularism. Christian Poland and Hungary are more resistant to globohomo than any secular country. Your bastardized liberalism is the illegitimate child of anti-Christian, anti-western Jewish talmudism, which was born of Babylonian semitic paganism.”—

    Lying is lying. You can justify lying all you want. But lying and denying is still lying and denying. 😉 Now you might want to say that Christian lies are better than other lies, and that might be true,but escaping semitism whether old world or new is best of all. My Rule Of Law is entirely west indo-european, pagan, germanic, anglo: realism, naturalism, operationalism, testimonial truth, individual sovereignty, reciprocity, heroism -duty, excellence-beauty, law-jury, and competitive markets in everything – wherein the Church failed. Greek paganism by itself devolved into neo-platonic witchcraft. Germanic paganism turned people into white savages who practiced human sacrifice. All you value in the west was fostered by Christianity. Greco Roman Paganism was the best religion ever invented: “Rule of Law”, “Offering to the Empire” (fealty), and Keep your own gods and local customs. All we do is create order so that we can create trade, so that we can collect taxes, so that we can use taxes to create commons. Everybody keeps their own saints, heroes, demigods, gods, and demons, so that power distance is retained. The only concern of the state is material. And none may break the natural law of reciprocity (or property) without punishment. So you get your mythology for psychology, sociology, morality – but you get natural law and rule of law for ethics, economics, and politics, and group competition. This creates the optimum markets for people to cooperate peacefully if they are not engaged organized crime. So this is why the jews rebelled, because they had discovered usury in babylon,and had built a culture as an organized crime syndicate, which still exists today – profiting from undermining peoples who can create commons by baiting idiots (like you) into hazard with false promise. Our people can survive if you keep your mythology for the purpose of psychology, sociology and morality – the weak or feminine mind and body, but we must also have rule of law by natural law, ethics, economics, and politics for reality – the strong or masculine mind and body. But at present you are a useful idiot of our ancient enemy -an enemy we made as soon as alexander crossed the bosphorus and brough oriental lying into european truth.

    —“Funny the decline of the West only happened when Institutional Christianity was weakened. What have you done besides blame the church for everything after undercutting it? Atheists are the most useful pawns.”—

    No, the decline of the west occurred when The Second Semitic False Promise was let loose using the same Abrahamic technique of deceit as in judaism, christianity and islam: Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno(frankfurt), Derrida, Strauss, (jewish feminists), Rothbard, Kristol: Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism, Neoconservatism.

    —“Marx was an explicitly anti-Christian pagan occultist, and all relied on the dialectic created by Judeo-Anglo masonry that vilified the Christian order in favor of a new liberal secular order that was just rebranded pagan statism.”—

    Marx was an abrahamist, using the Abrahamic method of deceit: undermining a host population, by false promise, baiting the ignorant into hazard, using the fictionalisms of supernaturalism-occult, idealism-surrealism pseudsocience-magic, pilpul(sophism) and Critique(straw manning) It does not matter what you say, what you say you believe, only what you demonstrate as evidence. Marx was just another abrahamist using the abrahamic method of undermining by making unwarrantable untestable false promises to the dim and ignorant, to construct undermine a host.


    (BTW: yes, first quote is religio-bait)

  • Answers to The Sophisms of Abrahmists

    Nov 4, 2019, 7:25 PM “I never err. Truth is a gift of Our Old Gods of Europa for me to use for Our People In our War against the Evil Gods and their People who lie.”

    —“Christianity survived and encouraged the development of local and regional European identities for centuries. Yet somehow the West only became vulnerable as a result of post-war secularism. Christian Poland and Hungary are more resistant to globohomo than any secular country. Your bastardized liberalism is the illegitimate child of anti-Christian, anti-western Jewish talmudism, which was born of Babylonian semitic paganism.”—

    Lying is lying. You can justify lying all you want. But lying and denying is still lying and denying. 😉 Now you might want to say that Christian lies are better than other lies, and that might be true,but escaping semitism whether old world or new is best of all. My Rule Of Law is entirely west indo-european, pagan, germanic, anglo: realism, naturalism, operationalism, testimonial truth, individual sovereignty, reciprocity, heroism -duty, excellence-beauty, law-jury, and competitive markets in everything – wherein the Church failed. Greek paganism by itself devolved into neo-platonic witchcraft. Germanic paganism turned people into white savages who practiced human sacrifice. All you value in the west was fostered by Christianity. Greco Roman Paganism was the best religion ever invented: “Rule of Law”, “Offering to the Empire” (fealty), and Keep your own gods and local customs. All we do is create order so that we can create trade, so that we can collect taxes, so that we can use taxes to create commons. Everybody keeps their own saints, heroes, demigods, gods, and demons, so that power distance is retained. The only concern of the state is material. And none may break the natural law of reciprocity (or property) without punishment. So you get your mythology for psychology, sociology, morality – but you get natural law and rule of law for ethics, economics, and politics, and group competition. This creates the optimum markets for people to cooperate peacefully if they are not engaged organized crime. So this is why the jews rebelled, because they had discovered usury in babylon,and had built a culture as an organized crime syndicate, which still exists today – profiting from undermining peoples who can create commons by baiting idiots (like you) into hazard with false promise. Our people can survive if you keep your mythology for the purpose of psychology, sociology and morality – the weak or feminine mind and body, but we must also have rule of law by natural law, ethics, economics, and politics for reality – the strong or masculine mind and body. But at present you are a useful idiot of our ancient enemy -an enemy we made as soon as alexander crossed the bosphorus and brough oriental lying into european truth.

    —“Funny the decline of the West only happened when Institutional Christianity was weakened. What have you done besides blame the church for everything after undercutting it? Atheists are the most useful pawns.”—

    No, the decline of the west occurred when The Second Semitic False Promise was let loose using the same Abrahamic technique of deceit as in judaism, christianity and islam: Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno(frankfurt), Derrida, Strauss, (jewish feminists), Rothbard, Kristol: Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism, Neoconservatism.

    —“Marx was an explicitly anti-Christian pagan occultist, and all relied on the dialectic created by Judeo-Anglo masonry that vilified the Christian order in favor of a new liberal secular order that was just rebranded pagan statism.”—

    Marx was an abrahamist, using the Abrahamic method of deceit: undermining a host population, by false promise, baiting the ignorant into hazard, using the fictionalisms of supernaturalism-occult, idealism-surrealism pseudsocience-magic, pilpul(sophism) and Critique(straw manning) It does not matter what you say, what you say you believe, only what you demonstrate as evidence. Marx was just another abrahamist using the abrahamic method of undermining by making unwarrantable untestable false promises to the dim and ignorant, to construct undermine a host.


    (BTW: yes, first quote is religio-bait)

  • Why didn’t you list ANTIFA, and their funding via Soros’ organization? Antifa ha

    Why didn’t you list ANTIFA, and their funding via Soros’ organization? Antifa has been behind every single act of violence since Obama took office. You’re intellectually and politically and morally dishonest.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 22:43:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267225310216556546

    Reply addressees: @RenaKARE11 @GovTimWalz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266743237563289606

  • The Definition of Abrahamism

    Nov 5, 2019, 11:00 PM Abrahamism (noun) The use of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of straw-manning, disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other. FULL In our Glossary of Natural Law “Abrahamism” refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards. All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Pilpul vs Critique. COMMON TACTICS 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”) 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance. 5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance. 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods. 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods. 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge. 9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood. FULL ANALYSIS Mankind’s Enemy’s Strategy Civilizational Destruction from Within; Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals Capital Destruction; Baiting into Hazard (certain risk); Those who are ignorant or lack agency; By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw-manning) Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, By not specializing in, … The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common … Warrantied By Specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk And Absent Warranty … Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion) … Informational Destruction (Academy) … Government (Facilitation of Conflict) … Legislation (Undermining by, Facilitation of Conflict, Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals, Parasitism, Capital exhaustion) … Rent-Seeking (special interests) … Corruption (influence) … Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts) … Law (specialization in coercion) … Finance (Parasitism and entrapment) … Tax and accounting (evasion) … Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining) … Sales Scams … Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational … Black Market Goods, services, and Information. … Check Cashing … Loan Sharking … Gambling … Pornography … Prostitution … Drug Dealing Thereby; … creating conflict, … destroying trust, … generating demand for restitution … generating demand for authority, An authority that recursively issues another iteration of … false promise, … baiting into hazard Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption) until all accumulated assets: … genetic, … cultural, … normative, … artistic, … economic, … institutional and … political; have been consumed; by the conflict between classes and interests and by the expansion of the underclasses; whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy; … And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons; … Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.

  • The Definition of Abrahamism

    Nov 5, 2019, 11:00 PM Abrahamism (noun) The use of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of straw-manning, disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other. FULL In our Glossary of Natural Law “Abrahamism” refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards. All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Pilpul vs Critique. COMMON TACTICS 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”) 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance. 5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance. 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods. 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods. 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge. 9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood. FULL ANALYSIS Mankind’s Enemy’s Strategy Civilizational Destruction from Within; Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals Capital Destruction; Baiting into Hazard (certain risk); Those who are ignorant or lack agency; By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw-manning) Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, By not specializing in, … The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common … Warrantied By Specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk And Absent Warranty … Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion) … Informational Destruction (Academy) … Government (Facilitation of Conflict) … Legislation (Undermining by, Facilitation of Conflict, Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals, Parasitism, Capital exhaustion) … Rent-Seeking (special interests) … Corruption (influence) … Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts) … Law (specialization in coercion) … Finance (Parasitism and entrapment) … Tax and accounting (evasion) … Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining) … Sales Scams … Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational … Black Market Goods, services, and Information. … Check Cashing … Loan Sharking … Gambling … Pornography … Prostitution … Drug Dealing Thereby; … creating conflict, … destroying trust, … generating demand for restitution … generating demand for authority, An authority that recursively issues another iteration of … false promise, … baiting into hazard Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption) until all accumulated assets: … genetic, … cultural, … normative, … artistic, … economic, … institutional and … political; have been consumed; by the conflict between classes and interests and by the expansion of the underclasses; whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy; … And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons; … Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.

  • It Is a Book that Functions by Suggestion and Undermines Reason

    —“The Bible is not what it seems. It is a book of the mind.”—Stephen Stobinski

    Yes it is a book that functions by SUGGESTION and undermines reason rather than EXPOSITION that improves reason? Is the bible a book for poisoning the mind with an addiction to self indulgence? Or like aristotle, a book for empowering the mind so that it is free of self indulgence? Or is it as simple as weak feminine-brained and infantile minds must feel, and strong masculine-brained and adult minds may reason? I am increasingly convinced that this is the answer which is why it’s an necessity to provide different paradigms for teaching a distribution of minds incapable of learning by other means.

  • It Is a Book that Functions by Suggestion and Undermines Reason

    —“The Bible is not what it seems. It is a book of the mind.”—Stephen Stobinski

    Yes it is a book that functions by SUGGESTION and undermines reason rather than EXPOSITION that improves reason? Is the bible a book for poisoning the mind with an addiction to self indulgence? Or like aristotle, a book for empowering the mind so that it is free of self indulgence? Or is it as simple as weak feminine-brained and infantile minds must feel, and strong masculine-brained and adult minds may reason? I am increasingly convinced that this is the answer which is why it’s an necessity to provide different paradigms for teaching a distribution of minds incapable of learning by other means.

  • “Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Ma

    —“Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Makes for easy alignment with the martyrdom of victim signal parasitism.”—Luke Weinhagen

  • “Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Ma

    —“Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Makes for easy alignment with the martyrdom of victim signal parasitism.”—Luke Weinhagen

  • Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It

    Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/words-are-terms-of-contracts-for-reciprocity-or-frauds-to-avoid-it/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 20:46:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267195814750957568