I have a very simple job studying a very complex problem: how to eradicate the remaining abrahamic deceits from european religion so that it is possible to prohibit the other abrahamic deciets (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, hbd-denial, political correctness) under law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 17:32:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267147067299893251
Reply addressees: @Aurini
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267146158930984960
—“Judaism is the virus, Christianity the infection, and Islam the cancer that results. Period. End the Abrahamic Dark Ages Forever. No More Lies.”—
Europeanism = Eugenia (Heroism – sci-tech ) Sinicism = Rational Equilibrium (harmony – rational) Hinduism = Intuitionistic Equilibrium (harmony – mythical) Abrahamism = Dysgenia (Undermining – fraud )
—Judaism is a polymorphic virus, rabies for the ingroup, HIV/Aids for the outgroup. No one dies of “AIDS” but from opportunistic diseases. … In this case, they are packaged as Christianity, Islam, etc. … and present different symptoms: lack of agency, universal moralism, etc for Christianity, and Islam with predation. … However, there may still be redeeming value, such as Islam solving the FQ (Female Question) and their stance on Riba (interest and usury), Christianity great for ingroup, etc.”—James Santagata
—“Judaism is the virus, Christianity the infection, and Islam the cancer that results. Period. End the Abrahamic Dark Ages Forever. No More Lies.”—
Europeanism = Eugenia (Heroism – sci-tech ) Sinicism = Rational Equilibrium (harmony – rational) Hinduism = Intuitionistic Equilibrium (harmony – mythical) Abrahamism = Dysgenia (Undermining – fraud )
—Judaism is a polymorphic virus, rabies for the ingroup, HIV/Aids for the outgroup. No one dies of “AIDS” but from opportunistic diseases. … In this case, they are packaged as Christianity, Islam, etc. … and present different symptoms: lack of agency, universal moralism, etc for Christianity, and Islam with predation. … However, there may still be redeeming value, such as Islam solving the FQ (Female Question) and their stance on Riba (interest and usury), Christianity great for ingroup, etc.”—James Santagata
1 – We all prefer novelty, attention, and status over income within the limits of our moral plausible deniability. 2 – We will prefer novelty, attention, and status, AND income, even if we exceed the limits of moral plausible deniability. 3 – End Plausible Deniability: “Name Names.” And Shame.
1 – We all prefer novelty, attention, and status over income within the limits of our moral plausible deniability. 2 – We will prefer novelty, attention, and status, AND income, even if we exceed the limits of moral plausible deniability. 3 – End Plausible Deniability: “Name Names.” And Shame.
The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval, (O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R)allying, (S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing, (U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent. This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood. FULL LIST (D)enial … (D)isapproval … … (O)utrage … … … (S)haming, … … … … (M)oralizing, … … … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … … … (R)allying … … … … … … … … (G)ossiping … … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing For the purpose of: … … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction. And and preserving: … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability) … … (S)elf Image … … … (S)tatus … … … … (F)ree Riding … … … … … (R)ent Seeking … … … … … … (C)oruption … … … … … … … (P)arasitism … … … … … … … … (P)redation With their act of: … … … … … … … … … … (F)raud. Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. DIAGNOSIS So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts. ADDICTION Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover. —Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.
The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval, (O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R)allying, (S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing, (U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent. This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood. FULL LIST (D)enial … (D)isapproval … … (O)utrage … … … (S)haming, … … … … (M)oralizing, … … … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … … … (R)allying … … … … … … … … (G)ossiping … … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing For the purpose of: … … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction. And and preserving: … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability) … … (S)elf Image … … … (S)tatus … … … … (F)ree Riding … … … … … (R)ent Seeking … … … … … … (C)oruption … … … … … … … (P)arasitism … … … … … … … … (P)redation With their act of: … … … … … … … … … … (F)raud. Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. DIAGNOSIS So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts. ADDICTION Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover. —Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.
—“The view of some people against your character: Overly arrogant (narcissistic and gets very defensive when challenged); uses GRSM when speaking against it; talks about being aristocratic but is not noble (i.e 3 ex-wives, not fit, and likely not even capable of fighting a war) (hypocritical). Some people suggest your king of the hill tactics is just an excuse to use GRSM.”—
I can see that. Also, I’m intolerant, fickle, find the populi rather vulgar, am kind but not nice, ruthless, and probably not a very good person either. Of course, none of that is a criticism of my work. It’s a demand for christian equality and subsidy of their education, not aryan aristocracy and demand for demonstration of achievement in exchange for education. 😉 Different frames are inconceivable. Nietzsche was still a christian, a continental, and a german. Aristotle wasn’t. And Odin sure wasn’t. I’ve internalized it: Religion Appeals, Law Demands.
—“The view of some people against your character: Overly arrogant (narcissistic and gets very defensive when challenged); uses GRSM when speaking against it; talks about being aristocratic but is not noble (i.e 3 ex-wives, not fit, and likely not even capable of fighting a war) (hypocritical). Some people suggest your king of the hill tactics is just an excuse to use GRSM.”—
I can see that. Also, I’m intolerant, fickle, find the populi rather vulgar, am kind but not nice, ruthless, and probably not a very good person either. Of course, none of that is a criticism of my work. It’s a demand for christian equality and subsidy of their education, not aryan aristocracy and demand for demonstration of achievement in exchange for education. 😉 Different frames are inconceivable. Nietzsche was still a christian, a continental, and a german. Aristotle wasn’t. And Odin sure wasn’t. I’ve internalized it: Religion Appeals, Law Demands.
Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relative ignorance, he is no different from his consumptive (liberal) counterpart. The only ‘truthful’ empirical, and therefore ‘conservative’ answer is: “i don’t know yet” But ‘i know…’ is merely a statement of being lazy or incompetent.