Genetically Feminine Conflict Strategy, … Strategic Practiced Feminine Jewish Strategy, … … Formally Articulated Feminine Jewish Saul Alinsky Technique, … … … Used in Marxist, Feminist, Postmodernist application; … … … … Undermining the compromise; … … … … … between classes, genders, individual differences; … … … … … … Of Rule of Law, Markets in everything, and The Intergenerational family – as the means of persistence of earned civilizational advantage for all. By the “New Big Lie” of the new “False Promise of Equality”, by reforming supernatural promise of life after death, with the pseudoscientific promise of elimination of differences in interpersonal, sexual, social, economic, political, market value that are entirely the product of our vast differences in genetic ability, quality, and therefore value to one another. Man was not oppressed – the families of the unfit classes were domesticated by the families of the better classes like all other plants and animals were domesticated, because of the outsized rewards for humans for having done so, and the necessity of: A Division Of labor, Property, The law of Tort, the Suppression of free riding, parasitism, and corruption by that law of tort, with property as a unit of measure; Causing Markets in Everything; Thereby Suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses; Who by poor genes, poor ability, poor character, poor discipline, must be genetically left behind for the rest of humanity to evolve out of ignorance, superstition, incompetence, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the hazards of a nature unconcerned, with human life, in a brief period of planetary, solar, and galactic quiet enabling, our persistence, evolution, and transcendence. Why does the NEW BIG LIE work like every other new big lie? Because we have failed to sufficiently domesticate the remaining demi-human animals into full humans, such that they are not vulnerable to the big lies, that resist, prevent, and reverse our evolutionary progress into the gods we imagined – free of the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to human life.
Theme: Deception
-
The New Big Lie: “One Man to Turn This Country Upside Down”
Genetically Feminine Conflict Strategy, … Strategic Practiced Feminine Jewish Strategy, … … Formally Articulated Feminine Jewish Saul Alinsky Technique, … … … Used in Marxist, Feminist, Postmodernist application; … … … … Undermining the compromise; … … … … … between classes, genders, individual differences; … … … … … … Of Rule of Law, Markets in everything, and The Intergenerational family – as the means of persistence of earned civilizational advantage for all. By the “New Big Lie” of the new “False Promise of Equality”, by reforming supernatural promise of life after death, with the pseudoscientific promise of elimination of differences in interpersonal, sexual, social, economic, political, market value that are entirely the product of our vast differences in genetic ability, quality, and therefore value to one another. Man was not oppressed – the families of the unfit classes were domesticated by the families of the better classes like all other plants and animals were domesticated, because of the outsized rewards for humans for having done so, and the necessity of: A Division Of labor, Property, The law of Tort, the Suppression of free riding, parasitism, and corruption by that law of tort, with property as a unit of measure; Causing Markets in Everything; Thereby Suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses; Who by poor genes, poor ability, poor character, poor discipline, must be genetically left behind for the rest of humanity to evolve out of ignorance, superstition, incompetence, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the hazards of a nature unconcerned, with human life, in a brief period of planetary, solar, and galactic quiet enabling, our persistence, evolution, and transcendence. Why does the NEW BIG LIE work like every other new big lie? Because we have failed to sufficiently domesticate the remaining demi-human animals into full humans, such that they are not vulnerable to the big lies, that resist, prevent, and reverse our evolutionary progress into the gods we imagined – free of the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to human life.
-
Defining Socialism for Yang
—“Journalists who come to Des Moines tomorrow with an open mind will have those minds blown. #Yangapalooza secure the center secure the future”—@AndrewYang —“Its not socialist to tax big tech companies and give everyone a $1,00 a month. Everyone gets it, its pay for with technology. Its not socialist!”— @ironpatriot2016 —“Curt?”—
Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets. Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons. Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers. The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard. Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard. Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise. When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade. I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention. And fools come for the bait.
-
Defining Socialism for Yang
—“Journalists who come to Des Moines tomorrow with an open mind will have those minds blown. #Yangapalooza secure the center secure the future”—@AndrewYang —“Its not socialist to tax big tech companies and give everyone a $1,00 a month. Everyone gets it, its pay for with technology. Its not socialist!”— @ironpatriot2016 —“Curt?”—
Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets. Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons. Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers. The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard. Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard. Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise. When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade. I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention. And fools come for the bait.
-
(Because when I debate people across the spectrum on something they’re angry see
(Because when I debate people across the spectrum on something they’re angry see into the mind of the opposition and in doing so I understand them – and mostly what I learn is that they live in a world of denial. Why? Cognitively Feminine. They can’t help it. Magical thinking.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 00:30:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267252198427295747
-
(Because when I debate people across the spectrum on something they’re angry see
(Because when I debate people across the spectrum on something they’re angry see into the mind of the opposition and in doing so I understand them – and mostly what I learn is that they live in a world of denial. Why? Cognitively Feminine. They can’t help it. Magical thinking.
-
Why the Harsh Words on Christianity?
As always, I’m running a test with multiple ambitions: 1) Are Christians really all nothing more than virtue signaling cucks, hiding behind a veil faith to mask cowardice, laziness, and lack of agency, or will they fight for their people? We almost never find a ‘devout’ Christian willing to fight. Ever. They always have an excuse. They won’t show up without a guarantee. They won’t fight until it doesn’t matter, and like women with small children, wantto show up and get an everbody-wins-prize if other men do the winning. I mean, isn’t christian tolerance just an excuse to gossip rally and shame while one leftist program after another undermines our civlization? Does christian really mean “I’m a domesticated human farm animal and I need to follow the herd in safety, ignorance and bliss? 2) Can we shame Christians into restoring masculinity to Christianity? Catholicism is dead in the next generation right? Traditional protestant denominations are dead. We only have the Evangelicals. About half go secular and half evangelical, and we’re gong to run out of christians to go evangelical soon. So, do we have to bring in Orthodoxy? How do we de-feminize de-loser Christianity? Because Orthodoxy works. Why? They don’t appeal to the trend, they stay with tradition. 3) Can we shame or criticize them into the reality that it doesn’t matter if you OBEY scripture or dogma without question; or if you follow jesus’ example, even if biblical prose is ‘for children'(Spiritualism, Deism); or if you do so because traditionally it has worked (Rational Choice); or understand that natural law and jesus’ example is the scientifically optimum strategy for cooperation – especially in a commercial polity (Scientific Choice)? 4) Or do we have to just assume all Christians are dead weight, will not fight for anything, will just coower at home and whine, and that we need to restore a pagan religion to save western civlization?
-
Why the Harsh Words on Christianity?
As always, I’m running a test with multiple ambitions: 1) Are Christians really all nothing more than virtue signaling cucks, hiding behind a veil faith to mask cowardice, laziness, and lack of agency, or will they fight for their people? We almost never find a ‘devout’ Christian willing to fight. Ever. They always have an excuse. They won’t show up without a guarantee. They won’t fight until it doesn’t matter, and like women with small children, wantto show up and get an everbody-wins-prize if other men do the winning. I mean, isn’t christian tolerance just an excuse to gossip rally and shame while one leftist program after another undermines our civlization? Does christian really mean “I’m a domesticated human farm animal and I need to follow the herd in safety, ignorance and bliss? 2) Can we shame Christians into restoring masculinity to Christianity? Catholicism is dead in the next generation right? Traditional protestant denominations are dead. We only have the Evangelicals. About half go secular and half evangelical, and we’re gong to run out of christians to go evangelical soon. So, do we have to bring in Orthodoxy? How do we de-feminize de-loser Christianity? Because Orthodoxy works. Why? They don’t appeal to the trend, they stay with tradition. 3) Can we shame or criticize them into the reality that it doesn’t matter if you OBEY scripture or dogma without question; or if you follow jesus’ example, even if biblical prose is ‘for children'(Spiritualism, Deism); or if you do so because traditionally it has worked (Rational Choice); or understand that natural law and jesus’ example is the scientifically optimum strategy for cooperation – especially in a commercial polity (Scientific Choice)? 4) Or do we have to just assume all Christians are dead weight, will not fight for anything, will just coower at home and whine, and that we need to restore a pagan religion to save western civlization?
-
Answers to The Sophisms of Abrahmists
Answers to The Sophisms of Abrahmists https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/answers-to-the-sophisms-of-abrahmists/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 00:03:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267245376207273987
-
Answers to The Sophisms of Abrahmists
Answers to The Sophisms of Abrahmists https://t.co/afnoeAVwPQ