Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • State Sponsored Hyperconsumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals

    —“What we like or want may not be good for us.” –Curt Doolittle

    Context of the original quote was that we have used a variety of techniques to generate hyper-consumption and especially conspicuous hyper consumption, and even worse, conspicuous hyper consumption of virtue signals. In other words, we may like hyper consumption but that does not mean it is good for us, any more than hyperconsumption of the pleasure response by drugs is, or hyperconsumption of sedation by alcohol, or hyperconsumption of calming by nicotine, or anything else in any similar spectrum. So, yes, “all things in moderation” for the individual but this isn’t enforceable if the entirety of the political economy is generating hyperconsumption for hyper-taxation, and hyper-redistribution. The state should not engage in the provision of the incentive to hyperconsume. This only benefits the financial sector. Instead, just redistribute liquidity in response to shock and sags directly to the consumer and cause business to fight over it.

  • State Sponsored Hyperconsumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals

    —“What we like or want may not be good for us.” –Curt Doolittle

    Context of the original quote was that we have used a variety of techniques to generate hyper-consumption and especially conspicuous hyper consumption, and even worse, conspicuous hyper consumption of virtue signals. In other words, we may like hyper consumption but that does not mean it is good for us, any more than hyperconsumption of the pleasure response by drugs is, or hyperconsumption of sedation by alcohol, or hyperconsumption of calming by nicotine, or anything else in any similar spectrum. So, yes, “all things in moderation” for the individual but this isn’t enforceable if the entirety of the political economy is generating hyperconsumption for hyper-taxation, and hyper-redistribution. The state should not engage in the provision of the incentive to hyperconsume. This only benefits the financial sector. Instead, just redistribute liquidity in response to shock and sags directly to the consumer and cause business to fight over it.

  • You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the

    You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the court documents. I don’t know the individual but I know others involved. You can make up fantasies in your head, but that doesn’t change anything. find the video, and watch the drivers’ side rear.

    Reply addressees: @M4A2020 @thequarksoup @billprady

  • You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the

    You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the court documents. I don’t know the individual but I know others involved. You can make up fantasies in your head, but that doesn’t change anything. find the video, and watch the drivers’ side rear.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 01:04:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267260626302382081

    Reply addressees: @M4A2020 @thequarksoup @billprady

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267259693392556032

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk); By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under cover of Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning) Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, Thereby; …creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated assets: …genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political; have been consumed; by expansion of the underclasses; whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk); By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under cover of Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning) Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, Thereby; …creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated assets: …genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political; have been consumed; by expansion of the underclasses; whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.

  • You Miss the Point. Anti-Materialism Is a Sophism to Cover for Lying. We Seek Ga

    You Miss the Point. Anti-Materialism Is a Sophism to Cover for Lying. We Seek Gains and To Prevent Losses. https://t.co/sHNNMWB3W2

  • You Miss the Point. Anti-Materialism Is a Sophism to Cover for Lying. We Seek Ga

    You Miss the Point. Anti-Materialism Is a Sophism to Cover for Lying. We Seek Gains and To Prevent Losses. https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/you-miss-the-point-anti-materialism-is-a-sophism-to-cover-for-lying-we-seek-gains-and-to-prevent-losses/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 00:47:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267256355993333761

  • You Miss the Point. Anti-Materialism Is a Sophism to Cover for Lying. We Seek Gains and To Prevent Losses.

    —“But I think you miss the mark somewhat here because heroism is fundamentally not about the material or Darwinian advantages.”—

    Heroism is a means of paying status and opportunity rather than material rewards, in exchange for directing dominance display to the production of commons. those commons may be physical, may be opportunities, may be, normative, may be informational or anything in between. So your mistake is failing to grasp that the use of ‘materialism’ as a criticism is an attempt to lie. instead, we seek gains whether material, opportunistic, or informational, and to prevent losses of the same. Because in all things we are simply an extension of the physical laws of the universe, with nothing other than the use of memory to choose optimum opportunities, rather than fae the limits of the physical world in seizing the first opportunity. it is by this vast accumulation of differences using different forms of memory that we capture and resist entropy while the reset of the universe decays. If I can get this thru: if you cannot convert an emotion to its underlying economic terms, then you are still talking superstition. It’s pseudoscientific superstition. But it’s superstition. In this example you are still thinking feelings have value, instead of that we evolved to experience positive and negative feelings for having increasing or decreasing assets, in physical (premium), opportunistic(discount), or informational (discount) form.

  • You Miss the Point. Anti-Materialism Is a Sophism to Cover for Lying. We Seek Gains and To Prevent Losses.

    —“But I think you miss the mark somewhat here because heroism is fundamentally not about the material or Darwinian advantages.”—

    Heroism is a means of paying status and opportunity rather than material rewards, in exchange for directing dominance display to the production of commons. those commons may be physical, may be opportunities, may be, normative, may be informational or anything in between. So your mistake is failing to grasp that the use of ‘materialism’ as a criticism is an attempt to lie. instead, we seek gains whether material, opportunistic, or informational, and to prevent losses of the same. Because in all things we are simply an extension of the physical laws of the universe, with nothing other than the use of memory to choose optimum opportunities, rather than fae the limits of the physical world in seizing the first opportunity. it is by this vast accumulation of differences using different forms of memory that we capture and resist entropy while the reset of the universe decays. If I can get this thru: if you cannot convert an emotion to its underlying economic terms, then you are still talking superstition. It’s pseudoscientific superstition. But it’s superstition. In this example you are still thinking feelings have value, instead of that we evolved to experience positive and negative feelings for having increasing or decreasing assets, in physical (premium), opportunistic(discount), or informational (discount) form.