Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • DEBATE AS RESEARCH FWIW: I use the ‘smart’ tactic as bait. It causes self-defens

    DEBATE AS RESEARCH

    FWIW: I use the ‘smart’ tactic as bait. It causes self-defensive and moral outrage in the opposition, and it’s from a position of moral outrage we are most likely to state our truthful intuitions. This is why I rely on the king of the hill (adversarial) method of research on social media. It’s also why people tend to think I’m holding a position that I don’t, I”m just investigating by running tests – and it’s mostly why people (somewhat justifiably)come to hate me. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:22:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764235674579531

  • @xxxlrx @voxday @JFGariepy (FWIW: I use the ‘smart’ tactic as bait. It causes se

    @xxxlrx@voxday@JFGariepy (FWIW: I use the ‘smart’ tactic as bait. It causes self defensive and moral outrage in the opposition, and its from a position of moral outrage we are most likely to state our truthful intuitions. This is why I rely on the king of the hill (adversarial) method of research on social media. It’s also why people tend to think I’m holding a position that I don’t, I”m just investigating by running tests – and it’s mostly why people (somewhat justifiably)come to hate me. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:20:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764230133421239

  • @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday You just lied again by 1) equating dev

    @RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday You just lied again by

    1) equating devotion (religion) to trust (science)
    Faith (religion) > Belief (Philosohy) > Trust (Action (economics, law))

    2) equating science(testifiable) to a faith(specifically because its untestifiable)

    3) equating the absence of trust in the untestifiable (science) with faith(religion) in the untestifiable specifically because it is untestifiable.

    4) science consists of the application of testimony outside of the field of its origin in the law. In the adversarial marketplace to falsify competing statements, that which survives falsification is the truth candidate. This is not true of faith (social construction of a falsehood). Instead, that which is desirable survives and propagates. Not because it is true – but because it is false and desirable. Why? We only need to know what is true in order to resolve conflicts. We can invent truth, falshood, fraud, and deceit in order to coerce others in to giving us what we want.

    This is why abrahamic religoin spreads: its a lie simple people want to be true. Because it means they are good by social constuction not by the evience of their actions in life.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:11:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764191934489504

  • @TheMakhairaofTruth @Autisticone1 @voxday Thank you for confirming that only lia

    @TheMakhairaofTruth@Autisticone1@voxday Thank you for confirming that only liars fail to make arguments, and instead state the pretense of having made one.

    Again, Abrahamic religions are constructed by the female use of false seduction by false promise of freedom from the physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe, by the use of social construction of falsehoods, using storytelling, fictionalism, deceit, and denial, but … as you’ve just demonstrated … pretense of knowledge that is not and cannot be demonstrated.

    That ist he meaning of faith: pretense of knowledge that isn’t, cannot be, demonstrated, as a means of social constructon of falsehoods (Frauds) to sedate the inferior from the psychological pressures of there inferiority given the accumulated genetic defect that they demonstrate by every display word or deed.

    You should not argue with me. The correct response to any qusetioning of faith is and only every can be “I choose to have faith regardless of the evidence, because faith is a construct of the mind, not the evidence’.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 18:34:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763811971300041

  • Well, you know, my mission with PLaw is largely to prevent the state, media, aca

    Well, you know, my mission with PLaw is largely to prevent the state, media, academy, and financial sector from lying to us (Fraud) about matters public: political, social, economic. But a significant portion (cognitively female, underclass) wants the government to lie to them.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 16:37:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491088812545822723

  • @voxday There is zero chance you’re smarter than I am. Zero chance you’ve done t

    @voxday There is zero chance you’re smarter than I am. Zero chance you’ve done the math. And an absolute certainty you’re quoting a Yale professor of theology who also claimed he’d done the math. And both of you proving that the function of Abrahamism is to teach adherence to lie so that they can engage in social construction of falsehoods, in order to collectively obtain false confidence is by false pretense of sexual, social, political, economic, military, status, explaining their evasion (or failure) of evolutionary adaptation, precisely because they lack that status by demonstrable means other than social construction of falsehoods.

    The female means of lying by undermining truth and social construction of falsehoods: Judaism > Christianity > Islam … Marxism > Neo-Marxism > Postmodernism > PC-Woke.

    Same tactics (female undermining of truth) same strategy (social construction of a falsehood that attempts to deny evolutionary superiority) and same result (Dark Age of Ignorance and Superstition).

    That’s the truth of why you lie, the history of why you lie, and the technique by which you lie, and the evolutionary origin of how and why you lie, in the female means of anti-social behavior, economic, political, cultural, civilizational warfare, because the female is weaker, and must seduce with false promises (lie) and undermine with disinformation (lie) by fomenting insurrection (war) because of her (your) weakness.

    Period. End of Story. So, Accusation Submitted. Argument Presented. Judgment Presented. Conviction Issued. The only question is the sentencing and the punishment for your crimes against humanity.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 14:45:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107762909718064410

  • @asomd2021 @voxday ACCUSATON: LIAR All early theories are imprecise and evolve t

    @asomd2021@voxday

    ACCUSATON: LIAR
    All early theories are imprecise and evolve to increasingly precise. Haeckel was working in right along and after Darwin, and did the best he could to communicate the idea of developmental similarity with the resources available. So he created those he could, borrowed some from others, duplicated those he couldn’t tell the difference, removed egg sacs, chose different stages of development, oritented, and scaled the different drawings, to illustrate the develomental similarity for the ordinary reader – not other biologists.

    In the drawing I’ve attached here, the photos are accurate.

    VERDICT:
    There is a difference in precision but his early attempt to illustrate the developmental similarity and sequence stands.

    Like I said. Abrahamic religion teaches you to lie. And you;re happy to lie. And the liars attempted to claim errors in precision are equal to falsity. As if a cartoon or a parable cannot be used to tell a fundamentl truth despite their extraordinary imprecision – if you catch my meaning – by appeal to the supernatural.

    Original Drawings vs Photos attached.

    Commonly Cited Paper:
    home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Haeckel–fra

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 14:27:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107762839968759052

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @etrade Fake News. TRUTH: Wealthy Companies with high stock p

    RT @curtdoolittle: @etrade Fake News.

    TRUTH: Wealthy Companies with high stock prices can afford to virtue signal because boards are irre…

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 04:59:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490913277429178370

  • I’m not. I’m stating a fact. This is to prevent their false criticism

    I’m not. I’m stating a fact. This is to prevent their false criticism.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 04:44:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490909340626468864

    Reply addressees: @state_secession @perlmutations

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490850672425979904

  • Funny. I think I’m still one of the more authoritative and viewed sources on Quo

    Funny. I think I’m still one of the more authoritative and viewed sources on Quora on this subject with 10k views per week or something, but once the suppression of genetics started there I stopped investing my time there.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 04:40:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490908295842123777

    Reply addressees: @bigbrojacksmack

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490877311779893248