@RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday You just lied again by 1) equating dev

@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday You just lied again by

1) equating devotion (religion) to trust (science)
Faith (religion) > Belief (Philosohy) > Trust (Action (economics, law))

2) equating science(testifiable) to a faith(specifically because its untestifiable)

3) equating the absence of trust in the untestifiable (science) with faith(religion) in the untestifiable specifically because it is untestifiable.

4) science consists of the application of testimony outside of the field of its origin in the law. In the adversarial marketplace to falsify competing statements, that which survives falsification is the truth candidate. This is not true of faith (social construction of a falsehood). Instead, that which is desirable survives and propagates. Not because it is true – but because it is false and desirable. Why? We only need to know what is true in order to resolve conflicts. We can invent truth, falshood, fraud, and deceit in order to coerce others in to giving us what we want.

This is why abrahamic religoin spreads: its a lie simple people want to be true. Because it means they are good by social constuction not by the evience of their actions in life.