Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • ON THE CRIME OF LYING (core concept in p-law) Re: “You have to intend to lie” Tu

    ON THE CRIME OF LYING
    (core concept in p-law)
    Re: “You have to intend to lie”
    Turns out: nope. https://t.co/oItUp1ujoQ

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 16:33:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491450294102028292

  • @jorville Look at you. On a platform for words. lol Here let’s try it your way:

    @jorville Look at you. On a platform for words. lol

    Here let’s try it your way: “Look at me! Lying and Denying, to protect my faith in magic men in the sky!”

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 12:20:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107768004166946589

  • @LegionnaireBear @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday (a) JFG

    @LegionnaireBear@Black_Rabbi@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday (a) JFG did the math and explained the ‘error’ vox was making.
    But it was unnecessary since the error is obvious. JFG was being gracious. I’m not. I’m not claiming it’s an error but a lie by a failure of due diligence because of motivated reasoning.

    (b) I explained the reason one makes such errors and engages in motivated reasoning – with emphasis on the Abrahamic method of deception and social construction.

    (c) While again the error for calculating the human rate is simple, the cause of evolution itself, the description of the process, and the range of variables one must account for in claiming evolution itself is mathematically impossible is not simple. I listed a subset of the variables necessary in order to show that vox was not accounting for those variables.

    (d) I listed a subset of the criteria that any mathematical formalization would have to overcome – and vox failed to.

    (e) What I didn’t do yet, because I was hoping someone was vaguely intelligent enough to comprehend, is that the rate of evolutionary computation approaches infinity and varies by rate (size) of infinity (or ‘infinities’), meaning any claim evolution in historical timeline isn’t possible must demonstrate a difference in rates of infinities. Now,I know that’s over pretty much anyone’s head who believes in woo woo.

    You will run out of lies before I will run out of truth.

    That’s how this thing called continuous recursive production of testimony by falsification that we call ‘science’, incrementally erases ignorance, error, bias and deceit.

    Science is just law applied outside of tests of reciprocity.

    But then you don’t want the truth. You want to preserve a lie. Which is why you are a criminal, committing crimes against the commons of man.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 12:16:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107767988917515206

  • @Snidely_Whiplash @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @voxday Them make an argument fro

    @Snidely_Whiplash@Black_Rabbi@RenegadeScoutr@voxday

    Them make an argument from evidence:
    (a) what obvious falsehood did I state?
    (b) what syllogism did I fail to understand? (you lying f—k)

    Let me help you out a bit. So, I know you morons rely on supernaturalism, faith as equivalent to testimony, sophistry, and innumeracy, plus rather extraordinary ignorance of mathematics, in pilpul, critique, lying and denying.

    But I suppose that you grasp that a syllogism constiutes a subset of the logic of inference, and within that logic of inference, a reliance on sets, and the failings of sets withing the logic of inference:
    (a) all syllogistic arguments are predicated on assummed premises
    (b) all such arguments are justificationary
    (c) proofs are a statement of internal consistency only.
    (d) there is no closure in (verbal) logic regardless of internal consistency
    (e) closure requires operational logic – because operational logic tests causality.
    (f) and so on the contrary, all set logic then at best is falsificationary with ‘proof’ limited to trivialities.

    But of course, if you understood what you claim to, you would know that these are basic findings of the 20th century. And that’s just a quick sketch.

    ( And yes the audience of intelligent folk find these bitch-slaps to your infantile arrogance the subject of humor.)

    So. Man up.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 06:21:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107766591171141248

  • it’s because they can be honest about being women elsewhere

    it’s because they can be honest about being women elsewhere….

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 00:30:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491207878354812928

    Reply addressees: @hoeberian @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491202915024846854

  • @Bkozelka29 @RedPilledWorld @voxday Unfortunately, faith appears to be an infini

    @Bkozelka29@RedPilledWorld@voxday Unfortunately, faith appears to be an infinite shield of lies. But yeah. I’d call that “owned”.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 23:46:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107765039387596940

  • THINK OF PARADIGMS THIS WAY System of Lies = System of Ambiguation. System of Me

    THINK OF PARADIGMS THIS WAY
    System of Lies = System of Ambiguation.
    System of Measurement = System of Disambiguation

    (reposted to combine the two)

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 23:32:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491193223750238210

  • @RedPilledWorld @voxday The only reason to follow Vox is to increase the number

    @RedPilledWorld@voxday

    The only reason to follow Vox is to increase the number of morons who self-select out of responsibility for cognitive agency. Between Vox, Nick, Fuentes, and the handful of other morons, the right is self selecting into various specializations in the spectrum of losership. Moths to flames of ignorance, stupidity, reproductive infertility, political infertility, genetic and cultural replacement.

    Truth is a competitive advanage. The enemy’s competitive advantage is lying. The right cannot compete with the lef’ts competitive advantage in lying. The right cannot also resist the left’s baiting the right into defeat in a competition for who can lie deny and undermine the bset. And so most of these right wingers are just bad liars assisting in the distraction of the morons from any possibility of organized victory.

    Natural selection is at work.
    And the feminine left is winning.
    Overwhelmingly.

    As far as I can tell the ethnocentric national socialists are the only competent popele in the field but by associating with uncle adolph and the swasticka instead of simply advocating for similar policies and poltical secession they disallow themselves the field of political opportunity.

    All the christians are exactly what the rest of the world thinks of them: infantilized drug addicts on the opium of socially constructed ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 23:27:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764965251254960

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764768384038667

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @RedPilledWorld @voxday Oh. I know Vox’s “Math” and as an explanation: non correlation without explaining causation. Now, the means of falsifying this particular argument is relatively simple and someone has already done so in this thread. For example, there are about 100M neural columns in your head. They manage to predict and iteratively test and re-predict a model of the world within a few milliseconds. This EVOLUTION of disorder into order you call perception is possible because those 100M neural colums work in PARALLEL. And they do so by adversarial competition for prediction over time. And those columns that correctly predict contain neurons that get fed for that correct prediction. Now, evolution works the same way. In massive parallel and variation and hybridization and variation and speciation and so on. So the (moronic) oversight of such calculations as vox has stated is presuming that taking an average rate of mutation in a stable life form that by its stability limits mutations is sufficient to statistically represent the wide variety of rates of mutation, the wide variety of selection criteria, and the massive parallelism that occurs as this wide range of potentials compete. Now, of course, the correct answer is that because evolution (evolutionary computation) is the function (first principle) of the universe, and because of the absolutely stupid-simple method of computation by which the universe computes increase in the capture of energy as existence – a stable relation, that anything that can be computed will be computed. And the rate of computation is simply the set of methods of evolutionary computation, the rate of trial and error, the rate and number of regulatory processes, the complexity of the exchange between the cellular biochemistry and the production of molecules, the rate of reproduction, the degree of parallelization, the number and frequency of speciation and recombination, the division of responsibility between cells, organisms, and complex organisms, and the chaos of the selection criteria produced by the environment, resources and competitors. Not how few of those factors are present in the ‘moron math’ of vox day. And how easily you morons are fooled by a basic incomprehension of basic statistics. The big ‘oops’ for example is the capture of mitochondria by one cell that tried to eat another cell. This allowed cells to divide by providing external resources of energy production, and the nucleus to divide the genetic material without increasing genetic mass, and without accounting for energy production. This ‘oops’ is not the only ‘oops’ that appears to have happened. SIMPLE MATH VERSION Any math that ends in infinities is false. Any math that is non-correspondent is false. Any math that cannot provide an operational construction is false. Because all of these failures are evidence of a failure to account for variables – what we call ‘hidden variables’. Vox’s math (which isn’t his by the way), is false.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764768384038667

  • @Jason_the_Gentleman @no_slunk @veraticus @voxday Again, 1) This is a convenient

    @Jason_the_Gentleman@no_slunk@veraticus@voxday

    Again,

    1) This is a convenient trope.
    2) You can create a lie
    3) You can be a carrier of a lie
    4) You can distribute a lie
    5) You can prmote a lie

    Now,
    1) in criminal law we generally require intent.
    2) In Tort Law we only require responsibility to demand restitution.
    3) In Tort law we only require a failure of due diligence to demand punishment in addition to restitution.

    Now
    you have an incentive to lie,
    you have an incentive to collect an inventory of lies as a carrier of lies.
    You have engaged in the distribution of the lie.
    And by arguing you have attempted to promote the lie.

    Now since we are speaking of a matter of the commons -meaning truth claims in pubilc about matters public, but
    1) have failed due diligence,
    2) actied with intent,
    then
    3) it doesn’t matter if you intend to lie or not,
    4) you distributed a lie for the purpose of self interest against the public interst, because the only public interst is truth.

    The reason for our laws is to ensure that you cannot profit from fraud even if that profit is just to preserve your self image, status, alliances, and the social construction of the fraud you share – a conspiracy of common interest.

    So, Accused, Argued, Convicted, and submitted for Sentencing for Responsibiilty, Restitution, and Punishment.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 22:47:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764804906756311

  • @no_slunk @veraticus @voxday Again. You’re proving my point that abrahamism teac

    @no_slunk@veraticus@voxday Again. You’re proving my point that abrahamism teaches you to claim knowledge you do not have, to lie, and to socially construct falsehoods.

    Can you testify that I’m not just covered in sweat from the summer heat, and inability to regulate my body temperature becasue I lack a thyroid, and take a number of allergy medicationst that exacerbate the problem?

    No, you can only lie.

    You lied. I know you are going to lie. Because christianity is a lie and all abrahamic religion consists of is a vast compilation of lies, using the female means of lying and denying using pilpul, gssrm, critique, social construction, lying and denying.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 21:41:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764547609755200