@Jason_the_Gentleman @no_slunk @veraticus @voxday Again, 1) This is a convenient

@Jason_the_Gentleman@no_slunk@veraticus@voxday

Again,

1) This is a convenient trope.
2) You can create a lie
3) You can be a carrier of a lie
4) You can distribute a lie
5) You can prmote a lie

Now,
1) in criminal law we generally require intent.
2) In Tort Law we only require responsibility to demand restitution.
3) In Tort law we only require a failure of due diligence to demand punishment in addition to restitution.

Now
you have an incentive to lie,
you have an incentive to collect an inventory of lies as a carrier of lies.
You have engaged in the distribution of the lie.
And by arguing you have attempted to promote the lie.

Now since we are speaking of a matter of the commons -meaning truth claims in pubilc about matters public, but
1) have failed due diligence,
2) actied with intent,
then
3) it doesn’t matter if you intend to lie or not,
4) you distributed a lie for the purpose of self interest against the public interst, because the only public interst is truth.

The reason for our laws is to ensure that you cannot profit from fraud even if that profit is just to preserve your self image, status, alliances, and the social construction of the fraud you share – a conspiracy of common interest.

So, Accused, Argued, Convicted, and submitted for Sentencing for Responsibiilty, Restitution, and Punishment.