Theme: Deception

  • “Some of the West’s people are tolerant of Cosmopolitan Jewish and Anglo Puritan

    —“Some of the West’s people are tolerant of Cosmopolitan Jewish and Anglo Puritan lies because we have members of the other classes who are still fearful of the aristocratic class.

    We must drive a wedge between them and the cosmopolitans and puritans. And it seems like this global employment and immigration crisis provides us with just that opportunity.

    The separate interests of the cosmopolitans and the lower classes of the host nation are becoming apparent – and with it, the lower classes are rebelling.

    The only group I see still tolerant of and allied to the Cosmopolitans is the academic class, most of whom are Underclass or Puritans because they academy has filtered out by intent and design the Aristocracy. But these ‘Secular Priests of Falsehood’ are still too afraid and confused about how they will survive, where they’ll go, what they’ll do once the people rebel against it.

    Showing them a plan during a transition would be helpful in getting them to decouple from the anti-commons crowd, too.”—Josh Jeppson


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 10:54:00 UTC

  • OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OU

    OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OUR FAULT FOR BEING OUT-GUNNED BY IT. ESPECIALLY BY THEIR ALLIANCE WITH OUR WOMEN AND PURITANS.

    There is blame for everyone in the enlightenment – perhaps the jews and French the most. As I say, don’t blame the innovator in warfare, blame those who are losign from not developing superior countermeasures because of underinvestment in weaponry.

    —“Ezra Pound had many clever ideas, but his faulting “Big Jew” was not one of them.”— Boris Miroslav Spacek

    He was correct that the cosmopolitans were the originators of the second ‘religious’ conquest of the west, this time by pseudoscience rather than by authoritarian mysticism.

    We have Aesop, Homer, Alexander, Aristotle, Aurelius, Machiavelli, Bacon, Locke, Smith, Hume, Jefferson, Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Menger, Nietzche, Hayek, and all those in between.

    But the cosmopolitans reacted to them with the Pseudoscientific Counter-Enlightenment: Boaz (anthropology), Freud (psychology), Marx (economics and sociology), Cantor(mathematical platonism), Mises (economic pseudoscience), Adorno/Frankfurt( anti-aristocratic aesthetics), Rand and Rothbard (anti-commons).

    And sold the pseudoscience to the female and underclass populace as a utopian scheme via the academy for profit, just as the mysticism was sold to the female and underclass via traveling preachers for profit: to rebel against the aristocracy that domesticated them out of ignorance, mysticism, tribalism, and poverty.

    So this is all merely a fact of history now, and the consequences of the first great lie: authoritarian mysticism, and the second great lie of critical pseudoscience are empirically observable as the destruction of common capital in all its forms.

    So no, he was not wrong.

    What he was wrong about, and what all subsequent generations have been wrong about, is that when one is confronted by an act of warfare wether by arms, by immigration(displacement), by economics, by conversion, or by information (falsehood), that one can be out-gunned-out-germed-out-steeled by immigration, economics, conversion, or informational propaganda as well as by force of arms.

    So that the failure to adapt to a new form of warfare is OUR FAULT, rather than the fault of the innovators of the new form of warfare.

    And this is not complicated.

    We have built western civilization into the FASTEST evolving civilization by the domestication of humans under our domain, through nothing more than the use of the common, natural, judge-discovered law, and the use of truth, empiricism, reason, arms and technology despite small numbers to do so. And we have dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of mysticism, ignorance, poverty, and starvation, and disease with those tools – and we profited from it. And there is no shame in that profiting.

    Compare the consequences of the use of western truth to domesticate man, and the consequences of the first reaction to aristocracy (scriptural religion), the second reaction to Aristotelian aristocracy (scriptural monotheism), and the third reaction to Baconian empiricism (pseudoscientific cosmopolitanism).

    Are jews responsible for the second and third great lies and the harm that they have done? Of course they are.

    Are we responsible for not yet advancing our law so that such lies are impossible to propagate through as aggressive punishment of that method of war and crime as every other method of war and crime?

    Yes, we are.

    So the jews are certainly to blame for much of the world’s reliance on the great lies, and the conflicts therefrom. But we are responsible for tolerating the great lies.

    The interesting question is… why are we tolerant of the great lies, either supernatural great lies, or pseudoscientific great lies?

    And why is it that the jews have learned to specialize in ‘the big lies’ as the Russians and Germans have so frequently observed?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 09:26:00 UTC

  • UM. I DO TRUTH. PROPAGANDA IS A NECESSARY TOOL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NECESSITY O

    UM. I DO TRUTH. PROPAGANDA IS A NECESSARY TOOL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NECESSITY OF TRUTH.

    —Q&A–“Curt, what is your opinion on Kek?—

    I am a New Right Philosopher. I work on changing our understanding of reality, and reforming our institutions to correspond to contemporary reality. My philosophy is reducible to increasing the prior scope of law from property and deception, to all information present in the commons, and the reformation of government to restore the market for commons between the classes – that have different interests. And to restore the purpose of policy to the family while preserving the purpose of law to the individual. By doing so I wish to restore our sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy, as well as our market for quality families, market for commons, market for leadership, and market for the resolution of disputes.

    I see propaganda and ridicule as a tactic against the working class just as I am using a tactic against the upper classes. So it’s just propaganda.

    I deal with truth.

    So aside from the observation that the adoption of Marxist ridicule rallying and shamming as a means of neutralizing rallying and shaming, seems to work, I don’t have any opinion. And it isn’t even vaguely interesting except that I recognize it’s value in a democracy where lies and propaganda re legal. i would prefer that all leftist parasitism was prosecutable as harm to the informational commons just as are libel and slander are harmful to individuals.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty.

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Social Science of Western Civilization

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:43:00 UTC

  • “Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and

    —“Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and emotional blackmail first,and the barrel of a gun later. In the closed nationstate model of the 20th century it was used to shift blocks of capital to different competing institutions. In a global neoliberal anarchic sense it’s used to loot dying nation states and transfer wealth to global oligarchic power confederacies. We must (temporarily?) embrace nationalism not necessarily along moral lines (nationalism has become a form of nostalgic romanticism that is fun obviously) but as “firewalls” against nomadic oligarchs looting and robbing and destroying our crumbling cultural and and bureaucratic institutions.”— Murray Sell


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:21:00 UTC

  • WHY DO WE NOT TEACH THE CIVIC LOGICS? SO THAT THE STATE CAN LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, A

    WHY DO WE NOT TEACH THE CIVIC LOGICS? SO THAT THE STATE CAN LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, AND MANUFACTURE IGNORANCE.

    In programming we learn the very great difference between the communication of meaning and the communication of truth.

    This is why programming is as necessary a skill as reading, mathematics, and basic logic.

    And it’s why numbers, money, accounting, and property are as important as vocabulary and grammar, the periodic table, or the list of subatomic particles.

    Now you have to ask yourself: Why we teach everything else, but the set of logic, grammar, rhetoric, and history, and the set of money, accounting, property, and economics in our schools?

    We know the answer.

    Because it provides children, and youth with the ability to make uncomfortable judgments by which to question the propaganda of their teachers, their professors, their public intellectuals, and their government.

    Because, an ignorant adult public can be farmed, and an empirical and meritocratic civilization destroyed, by a government of lies, justifying its self-interest via pseudoscience, propaganda, and fraud.

    We will restore truth and testimony in education just as severely as any other part of the commons.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Religion of the West

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 11:23:00 UTC

  • NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK ON PARASITISM (LEFTISM) Never, Never, Never, Never, N

    NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK ON PARASITISM (LEFTISM)

    Never, Never, Never, Never, Never.

    If you encounter ridicule, shaming, rallying, shouting-down, or propagandism to obscure an attempt at circumvention of voluntary exchange and to force or justify parasitic extraction, then hit first and instruct later.

    If you encounter free riding on commons, avoidance of maintenance of the commons, socialization of losses into the commons, privatization of commons, damage to the commons, conspiracy to free ride, avoid, socialize, privatize, or damage the commons, or act of war against the commons by violence, immigration, trade policy, religious conversion, or informational warfare – then strike first and instruct later.

    NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK.

    Instead, PROSECUTE the slightest imposition upon the commons.

    This is the most important cost you pay for living in the Eden we had made.

    Every property owner a juror, sheriff, a judge, a warrior. That is the price of Property In Toto: constant diligence.

    And those that do not pay that cost of constant diligence are merely parasites upon the commons that those who defend it have made.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 10:53:00 UTC

  • Why do we have FREE FALSE speech rights rather than FREE TRUE speech rights? ‘Ca

    Why do we have FREE FALSE speech rights rather than FREE TRUE speech rights? ‘Cause Libel, Slander and Duel.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 10:47:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795215925309886464

    Reply addressees: @BoutrousTed @Bgiant1Bob

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789879295577587712


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BoutrousTed

    I repeat: I will represent pro bono anyone #Trump sues for exercising their free speech rights. Many other lawyers have offered to join me. https://t.co/LJf6TtmGZU

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789879295577587712

  • Psychology is a pseudoscience and all psychologism a use of it to commit a fraud

    Psychology is a pseudoscience and all psychologism a use of it to commit a fraud. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 04:42:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795124225187184640

    Reply addressees: @ogiesoro @LilDocCollins @Bgiant1Bob @nsa @CIA

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795094788659933184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795094788659933184

  • Libertines don’t like it when you argue that not only have they malinvested thei

    Libertines don’t like it when you argue that not only have they malinvested their time, not only are they useful idiots for anti-western civilization propagandists, but that they’re immoral frauds, perpetrating that fraud and causing damage to their civilization every time they press a key or open their mouths.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 14:21:00 UTC

  • EQUALITY: IT’S ALL JUST FRAUD TO ESCAPE EXCHANGE Science sucks. The earth isn’t

    EQUALITY: IT’S ALL JUST FRAUD TO ESCAPE EXCHANGE

    Science sucks. The earth isn’t flat. The sun doesn’t revolve around the earth. Life isn’t designed. And men and women aren’t equal. The existence of inequality forces us to conduct exchanges. The attempt to deceive one another that we are equal is an attempt to force transfers rather than conduct exchanges. In other words, all talk of equality is both lost opportunity for mutual satisfaction, and an act of fraud: theft.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 09:38:00 UTC