–“Polls are no longer predictive. They are propaganda tools.”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 09:56:00 UTC
–“Polls are no longer predictive. They are propaganda tools.”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 09:56:00 UTC
BECAUSE self-reporting on subjects of MORAL decidability are naturally biased to those with certain biases.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 09:33:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796284450573262848
Reply addressees: @WRKnowlton @NateSilver538
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796223722214461441
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796223722214461441
RT @Outsideness: Damn. It would be easier to attend to the state of my soul if leftist tears didn’t taste so good.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 09:13:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796279412987723776
Funny. Where are all the “Cucks” and “Sh_t libs” today? The infosphere is molasses-thick with Alt-Right gloating.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 07:31:00 UTC
RT @KurtSchlichter: Maybe the first step in stopping the hate you fear is for you to start the process by stopping hating us. @paulkrugman
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 06:58:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796245487552757760
SANTAGATA ON THE TRUTH WE DISCOVERED IN THIS ELECTION
Lessons & Observations from this election:
1) There is no “mainstream media”. There is only a Controlled Media.
2) The Polls are almost all lies to shape consent, to shame and to control. And to try and generate and gain “moral outrage” for the losers.
3) You would never call a Chinese “racist” or “xenophobic” for voting for a Chinese in China, therefore, it’s not just hypocritical but unacceptable to call a white person “racist” or “xenophobic” to do the same in U.S. (btw I have never heard of any Chinese electing whites to significant positions of power anywhere in China as one example).
4) When you attempt to shame people about who they shouldn’t vote for and tell them their ancestors who put men on the moon and gave you semiconductors and GPS and science and tech ad infinitum that they are tainted and losers they will Reveal preferences at the poll. Push the further and you’ll find out who they fight when cornered.
5) Trump proved that a Jedi level persuader can take on his party, the opposing party and the entire Controlled Media and win. There are a number Of simple psychological reasons and techniques which tap into our collective hard wired DNA and imprint in our psychological over the eons.
Enough lessons and observations for today…
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 04:25:00 UTC
THE POLLS AND THE MEDIA WEREN’T WRONG, THEY JUST FAILED THIS TIME TO CREATE PUBLIC OPINION.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 04:17:00 UTC
Retweeted NassimNicholasTaleb (@nntaleb):
Who got burried?
Saudi Barbaria
Goldman Sacks
Syrian Jihadis aka “rebels”
Academic Economists w/PseudoNobel
NYT & other bullshit venues.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 04:14:00 UTC
Retweeted Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter):
Maybe the first step in stopping the hate you fear is for you to start the process by stopping hating us. @paulkrugman
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 01:58:00 UTC
The political questions we face are very different if we seek to eliminate error, bias, and deceit, rather than if we seek to identify optimums by which to obtain discounts. People will seize the discounts no matter what. the problem is in decreasing the error, bias, and deceit, so that those opportunities are more readily visible. It’s not that we should ignore error bias and deceit so we must constantly thrash through them to find the opportunities amidst the clutter.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 15:31:00 UTC