http://www.wsj.com/articles/grifters-in-chief-1477610771″THE GRIFTERS IN CHIEF”
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 18:37:00 UTC
http://www.wsj.com/articles/grifters-in-chief-1477610771″THE GRIFTERS IN CHIEF”
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 18:37:00 UTC
http://www.livescience.com/56614-brain-may-get-desensitized-to-dishonesty.html
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 17:46:00 UTC
STOP BLAMING THE TRIBE OF JEWISH MEN FOR WHAT IS A UNIVERSAL FEMALE PROBLEM OR YOU WILL SOLVE THE WRONG PROBLEM.
—“It’s not the +Cathedral+ it’s the (((Synagogue)))”—-Danny Bogdan Polishchuk
It’s not really true.
It’s an alliance between the NE/Anglican Puritans, The Cosmopolitans, and the Feminists.
We can’t blame it all on (((them))).
Rothbard tried to blame it all on the Puritans.
Alt-Righters try to blame it all on the jews .
But the problem is Women and the Jews have the same reproductive strategy, the same intuitions, and employ the same tactics. The major difference being that women tend not to select eugenically, and jews have nearly industrialized eugenic female evolution in their men at least. Just as we have industrialized over millennia the eugenic evolution of ALL of our classes.
THE PRINCIPLE INSIGHT: NOT OTHERS, BUT WOMEN.
Why is it we feel the compulsive need to make a war between groups of men, that is instead, a war between women and men made possible by the transformation of the houses of parliament from one-man-one-family-one-vote, to one individual-one-vote, thereby transferring the compromise between individual men and women in a market for sex, reproduction, care and insurance, into a war of organized violence between the sexes.
Look at Jews as all women (they pretty much are) and stop looking at them as men. Then look at the data. It’s single women, the underclass, and jews as females, that are the problem.
Basically, it’s women and the underclass against men and families.
And we let it happen.
THE PRIMARY REASON
So I hope you and others take a hard look at the primary reason that we don’t act: that acting means restoring our domestication of women so that they cannot ally with out-group members against us, thereby taking down our genes, our culture, and our civilization.
Until you understand the material problem, that democracy gave violence by proxy to women, who are, by nature, against us, then you will try to cure the wrong problem. The problem isn’t jews. The problem is that women’s reproductive strategy, of which all jews are members. They are the ultimate expression of the female unleashed from the civilizing influence of the male.
Spare the rod, spoil the beast.
Spare the rod, spoil the child.
Spare the rod spoil the woman.
Spare the rod spoil the immigrant.
Spare the rod spoil the opponent.
Spare the rod spoil the enemy.
Children do not know what they do any more than women do.
Women do not know what they do any more than we do.
Jews do not know what they do any more than women do.
SCIENCE:
We capture and herd women, capture territory, capture resources. Then we divide the spoils. Everything else is just good manners to make it easier and more pleasant.
I am all for good manners and all. But in the end, evolution isn’t kind to us. The red queen keeps running whether we take a break or not. We either dominate and win, or we let others dominate and win.
UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS
Science – the pursuit of truth – is not kind to us. The question is whether we out Gun, Germ, Steel, Science, and Govern others or whether they do the same to us.
The problem we face is not others. It is failing to grasp that the ‘other’ is the female reproductive strategy living among us with unmarried women, undomesticated women, and undomesticated men.
Women need civilizing more so than men, For the principle reason that violence is far easier to civilize than deception. Women were despised in most of history because of their impulsivity and deceit. WE have tried through education to civilize them in ways we had not civilized them in the past.
Those who govern can only do so from having domesticated each other through the reciprocal control of marriage.
Assuming we have any vote at all, then it CAN only come from one marriage one vote.
Because marriage is the first ‘business’ we enter into.
Business and industry the second.
Finance and economy the third
Commons the fourth
And rule the fifth.
Marriage is the first organization that demonstrates your ability to cooperate at high cost for common good. Without this demonstration of your capability, we have no evidence that you should contribute to the commons. We have only your false promise and wishful thinking. And that’s what the evidence of a century has told us: it was false promise and wishful thinking.
Individuals adhere to rule of law.
markets demonstrate ability to cooperate with peers.
Families demonstrate reproductive cooperation between genders.
Commons demonstrate common investment between families.
This is why the west invented empiricism.
BECAUSE WE LIVED IT EVERY DAY.
“show me, don’t promise me”
That’s empiricism.
CLOSING
Jews are just the expression of the female – the ‘Amazons’ we were searching for have always been among us. But they do not employ violence. They employ rallying, shaming, gossip, mysticism, religion, pseudoscience, and deceit. Which is a much harder form of parasitism to suppress by common law, than violence and theft.
If we restore rule of law, and we restore truth to the informational commons, then the female strategy of deception, rallying and shaming will again be impossible.
Testimonial truth, Propertarian ethics, market government: markets in everything.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:08:00 UTC
THINGS I DIDN’T KNOW: “SH_T POSTING”
“sh_it post”
The adoption of Marxist/Feminist propagandism, shouting-down, interference, lying, rallying, shaming in person and in the media, by Conservative/Masculinists and applied to the internet discourse.
1: Frequent and Numerous
3: Unconstructive and Unrelated
6: Antagonistic or Offensive
8: Sarcastic, Juvenile, Irrational, or Absurd
10: Text, Image, or Video
11: That imposes a cost on the existing conversation
12: As an assertion of disapproval, rebellion, dominance, aggression, or propagandism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 09:07:00 UTC
Weaponization of the feminine reproductive strategy of intuiting, resisting, displays of rejection, ridiculing, criticizing, gossiping, rallying, and shaming, all of which impose costs (increase frictions) on the status anticipate for organizing to concentrate capital of all kinds, so that we cannot concentrate it, through aggressive eugenic selection. In other words, they manipulate our high trust society by imposing costs on the status signals a heroic civilization uses in order to form high risk and costly organizations.
Women ‘let through’ only those things they agree with, and they rally and shame against anyting they don’t agree with.
the problem is that what they agree with is almost always bad for the men.
This is the Jewish strategy as well, and it was highly influential under the ancient empire, and the modern empire, when a combination of new media in the modern, and discounted and safe transport in the ancient world made preachers and letters possible.
In modernity we not only enfranchised women and jews but we broke the constraint of debate-between peers by the use of cheap mass communication.
We created an amplifier for lies, pseudoscience, and mysticism, consumable by the masses, and we did not regulate the use of that amplifier (media) to that which was truthful, material, and scientific.
Why? Because in our ancient tradition, when only voices, letters, and books (all costly) could be met with equal voice, letter, and book, only the aristocracy could afford to speak, and only aristocracy was afforded such speech, and between the violence on could incurr via duel or assassination, one was reasonably careful about what one said.
By enfranchising the underclasses, enfranchising women and then jews (all of whom vote as women, and supply argumentative weaponry to women and the underclasses) and giving them discount on communication, without regulating that communication to the true, we let them use technology to create sufficient lies, while we ourselves maintained our ancient aristocratic prohibitions, knowing that we could incur violence.
WE CREATED THE DOUBLE STANDARD by not continuing to enforce, by violence the previous standard of truthfulness that had been enforced by violence for 5000 years.
THE SOLUTION IS SIMPLE
Raise the cost of lying, fraud, and deceit by enforcing the demand for truth and science in political discourse. And we raise the cost through the application of violence.
The left cannot survive the truth, which is why they invented so many lies.
We cannot admit the truth (at least we couldn’t before): that we have domesticated the world at the point of a spear, sword, bayonet, bullet, shell, and missile – against it’s interests. And we are continuing to domesticate the world by forcing primitives into the market much against their will.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 07:53:00 UTC
—“The process of being Red Pilled means realizing that the narratives of the day are lies and that the institutions of ‘authority’ are merely means of predation.
Those who are Blue Pilled still believe the lies that the Priests of Modernity spew.
So we are in this weird situation where we are dealing with Red Pilled people who can’t figure out that we are NOT lying to them (because our answers are too complex) and are just going with their gut and hating anything that they can’t grasp intuitively. 🙂 “—- William Butchman
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 16:43:00 UTC
Western High Trust Society was built by forgoing early marriage and reproduction, free riding, and deciet.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:53:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790883927384817665
Reply addressees: @harrison_partch @SnapPopCrackle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
So to an honest man wealth is a resource and entrust is an investment. A dishonest man moralizes instead.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:48:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790882706980757504
Reply addressees: @harrison_partch @SnapPopCrackle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
Conversely, the reason people use loaded verse is to deceive: to cast as universal that which is particular
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:47:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790882507923288064
Reply addressees: @harrison_partch @SnapPopCrackle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
There are always agitated men. What they require is a moral justification for violence; an alternative to demand; and a crisis to exploit.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:39:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880492535025664