Theme: Deception

  • THE HISTORY OF UTOPIAN LYING – Progressivism: The Government of lying (state/aca

    THE HISTORY OF UTOPIAN LYING

    – Progressivism: The Government of lying (state/acad./media)

    – Cosmopolitanism: The Industrialization of lying (academy/media)

    – Islam: The Militarization of lying

    – Christianity: The Bureaucratization of lying (church/priest/literacy)

    – Judaism: The Professionalism of lying (rabbi/teachers)

    – Zoroaster: The invention of lying


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 15:22:00 UTC

  • THE INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL CONDUCT BY THE S

    THE INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL CONDUCT BY THE SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL INFORMATION.

    We defend life (murder)

    We defend the body (harm)

    We defend property (theft and harm)

    We defend kin (genes)

    We defend allies and nighbors (relations)

    We defend interests (private shares, public commons)

    We defend institutions (norms and formal institutions)

    We defend the territory (air, sea, land, resources, nature)

    We defend the market (involuntary warranty of goods, and services – and now INFORMATION)

    The west has been defeated in the ancient past by lies (supernatural monotheism)

    The west has almost been defeated in the modern era by lies (jewish pseudoscience, and puritan pseudorationalism)

    The first defeat was achieved through a near monopoly on writing and preaching.

    We rescued ourselves by the invention of the printing press and literacy.

    The second near defeat was achieved through a near monopoly on MEDIA.

    We are rescuing ourselves through the new literacy: the internet.

    There is no reason we do not demand in information, the same warranty of due diligence against HAZARD that we demand from GOODS and SERVICES.

    We do not ask the liar, the thief, and the immoral propagandist for permission to prosecute them, to kill, punish, deprive, and silence them. We threaten punishment and we demand restitution.

    My position is that it is quite possible to create an online reporting system for people who create hazards, collect data about them for later prosecution, use violence to obtain power to expand the common law to include warranty of due diligence on public speech, and then prosecute, judge and kill, punish, deprive, or silence those people so that just as we have eliminated violence, theft, fraud, and conspiracy from the market for goods and services, that we eliminate creations of criminal, unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial information from the market as well.

    If we kill enough of the people for advocating ‘voluntarism’ – an excuse to ignore externalities and hazards – then people will refrain from advocating ‘voluntarism’ and the export of externalities and hazards.

    It’s not that we shouldn’t use violence.

    It’s that don’t do enough of it.

    Hence: incremental suppression.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 13:37:00 UTC

  • THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION: THE PEOPLE WORKING ON ENDING THE CENTURY OF ‘PSEUDOSCI

    THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION: THE PEOPLE WORKING ON ENDING THE CENTURY OF ‘PSEUDOSCIENCE’, ‘PSEUDORATIONALISM’, ‘PSEUDO-LEGISLATION’, AND ‘LYING’ :

    – ?? Gaad Saad (psychology/falsehood) ??

    – Jordan Peterson (psychology/falsehood/stoicism)(not happy to be on this list I assume)

    – Stephen Hicks (ethics) (who I doubt likes being in this list)

    – Jonathan Haidt (morality)(also doubt likes being on this list)

    – Curt Doolittle (law, testimony, and epistemology)

    – Nassim Taleb (fragility, innumeracy, pseudoscience) (first mover)

    – Kevin Macdonald (group evolutionary theory-jewish)(first mover)

    – Ricardo Duchesne (group evolutionary strategy -western)

    Now, I think i’ve painted the whole picture because I choose to work only with incentives (operations) but everyone is contributing to it in his own frame of reference. Together we are revising the world.

    We are seeing the following changes:

    (a) the transition from theory to operationalism. (profound)

    (b) the end of the competitive luxury of universalism. (expected)

    (c) the end of the era of cosmopolitan pseudoscience.

    (d) the end of the puritan (anglo) enlightenment fallacy.

    (e) the completion of the western european program (truth).

    (f) the reconstruction of what we used to call ‘stoicism’. (surprising)

    (g) the end of the academy (surprising)

    Dr Jordan B Peterson, Professor of Psychology might not understand he is reconstructing stoicism in scientific rather than original terms. He may. He may not.

    I was not aware that I was reconstructing the stoic intuition of natural law.

    Popper was not aware that his program was incomplete – overly simplistic.

    Hayek understood he had discovered that like physics, the model for the social sciences is best explained by information (changes instate) rather than electromagnetism, physical force, or the will of the gods.

    There is a reason science was a byproduct of western LAW. The logic of the law consists of MORE DIMENSIONS than it’s predecessors EMPIRICISM, RATIONALISM, LOGIC, and MATHEMATICS.

    We all SENSE this in one way or another. And together we are approaching the completion of the western program: TRUTH, after 2500 years, and multiple failures.

    But like our ancestors we sensed something in the distance. And step by step we are about to cross the threshold of a very different future – one as different as empiricism from rationalism, rationalism from reason, and reason from mysticism, and mysticism from anthropomorphism

    And I am certain the returns on the OPERATIONAL (existential) era of truth, over the era of empirical truth, will be as great as the returns on empirical truth over mysticism and rationalism.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 11:21:00 UTC

  • Tucker is a good person and I have affection for him. Not everyone is ready. The

    Tucker is a good person and I have affection for him. Not everyone is ready. They must lose hope in error first.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 01:46:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804139682569265152

    Reply addressees: @grimsithe @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216

  • “These boomer critics don’t even know what the alt right aesthetics are. Not tha

    —“These boomer critics don’t even know what the alt right aesthetics are. Not that I mind their confusion lasting up until the very moment they become the subjects of some pyrotechnic performance art.”— Carlos Clark


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 19:42:00 UTC

  • OMFG. Is there anyone who gives a sh-t what porn you watch? All exposure of acco

    OMFG. Is there anyone who gives a sh-t what porn you watch? All exposure of accounts will do is make it socially acceptable to talk about your taste in porn, and for the alt right to pepper ‘cucks’ and ‘sjws’ who complain with green frogs.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 18:03:00 UTC

  • TO THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT ON YOUR LATEST VIRTUE-SIGNALING EXERCISE REGARDING

    TO THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT ON YOUR LATEST VIRTUE-SIGNALING EXERCISE REGARDING TRUMP.

    We have a word over here on The Right for men who genuflect before women’s emotionalism as if their feelings equate to material change in state. We call these men ‘cucks’. Short for ‘cuckolds’. And for reasons we can’t quite understand, other than perhaps Australians and New Zealanders have no other achievement or export than virtue-signaling, it seems that members of both governments do little more than produce a virtue-signaling economy of cuckoldry. Why? Because the female vote is bought cheaply with the same meaningless emotional currency as women demand and cuckholds sell. Meanwhile the empirical people in the world, in our financial, commercial, and military economies try to produce material benefits faster than the Red Queen of Virtue Signals can tax them, spend to demonstrate virtue signals for women who are consumers of emotions rather than facts.

    This is the reason that democracy is coming to an end. The century of virtue signaling is coming to an end. Because we can no longer produce an unwarranted fraudulent emotional product on the backs of people who create material products, services, and information.

    You are not seeing what you think you’re seeing. What you’re seeing is america implode from its own virtue signaling in the face of the universal adoption of consumer capitalism, the end of the Peace of Westphalia, the end of Anglo dominance of the international network of finance and trade, and and the restoration of non-state warfare by religion, demographics, disinformation, and persistent petty raiding that increases cooperative risk – decreasing trust, increasing demand for an authoritarian state to forestall declines in trust, and the economic consequences of political and economic and social distrust.

    And just to be clear: it was ‘cucks’ chasing female votes with ‘free lunches’ and virtue signals that brought the end to the Westphalian Peace and the restoration of polycentric warfare by both military, economic, demographic, religious, and disinformational means.

    It was women who filled the universities with demand for the Frankfurt schools’ utopian promises, and paid the academy money for anthropological, political, social and economic pseudoscience. Driving up university revenues and impoverishing a generation in old age, so that they could study pseudoscience in large numbers, and vote to expand it.

    Can you look the evidence of history in the face? Or will you deny the truth of granting women access to the same responsibilities as men without the same cognitive biases of men, instead of giving women a separate house of parliament, and requiring reconciliation between men and women of different reproductive interests and cognitive biases? Can you look the evidence of history in the face and accept that the English method of creating houses for each class created a market for exchanges of commons between the classes, and that single-house monopoly government, abandonment of natural law in favor of fashionable majoritarianism, further expanded the monopoly – eroding the market for exchanges between the classes.

    You are just behind the USA. Britain is smaller so it is just catching up to the USA. But the answer is the same: we had more trouble domesticating women’s hyper-consumption than we did men’s violence. That’s why we invented monogamy: as a trade. We have been battling islam since 700AD when they caused the military collapse of mediterranean trade through raids, and incrementally de-civilized North Africa, Spain, and the Balkans just as they are causing raids against us today. And none of those regions has been able to recover in the centuries since.

    So perhaps you should look in the mirror. The world is shifting from the era of a monopoly of pseudoscience, fraud, and lies, to an era of trade once again, between nations and classes and genders.

    Why? Because monopolies are always a bad thing that attract the worst people, and a monopoly producer of virtue signals on the backs of producers that sells signals to useful idiots, granted votes by virtue of existence, rather than by demonstrated success in contributing to the commons in a market for reproduction; a market for goods, services, and information; a market for dispute resolution by natural, judge-discovered common law, and a market for the production of commons between the classes, is just the most sophisticated system of selling religion, snake oil, pyramid schemes, and fraud since the church invented the bureaucratization of preaching and the collecting of tithes.

    The fool is in the mirror.

    (Thus ended the lesson so to speak.)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 09:56:00 UTC

  • Economic pseudoscience is achieved by cherry picking changes in total capital to

    Economic pseudoscience is achieved by cherry picking changes in total capital to hide thefts. Paul adv. fraud.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 16:45:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803278699919540224

    Reply addressees: @quiltednursery1 @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609


    IN REPLY TO:

    @quiltednursery1

    @curtdoolittle @paulkrugman A matter of opinion. PAUL should have been awarded 2:)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609

  • Are we measuring social science (truthfulness), providing insurance, or are we m

    Are we measuring social science (truthfulness), providing insurance, or are we measuring deception?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 16:43:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803278251632099328

    Reply addressees: @quiltednursery1 @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609


    IN REPLY TO:

    @quiltednursery1

    @curtdoolittle @paulkrugman A matter of opinion. PAUL should have been awarded 2:)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609

  • Specialization in econ. is not commutable. Paul cherrypicks deltas in capital he

    Specialization in econ. is not commutable. Paul cherrypicks deltas in capital he measures to state falsehoods.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 16:43:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803278050133766144

    Reply addressees: @quiltednursery1 @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609


    IN REPLY TO:

    @quiltednursery1

    @curtdoolittle @paulkrugman A matter of opinion. PAUL should have been awarded 2:)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609