The first step in subversion is demoralization. It takes 10-15 years to generate one generation in subversion. Our miliennials are our second subverted generation. Their parents the feminist generation the first subverted generation.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 10:34:00 UTC
INTELLECTUALS ARE THE VEHICLE FOR SUBVERSION
85% Of KGB funding was for subversion: undermining trust in the enemy’s class structure. Subversion is LEGAL in western countries. It is ILLEGAL in Japan and China. They are right and we are wrong.
The Academy, The Media, The State, and our Women, have been subverted by both the soviets and the cosmopolitans.
Religion, pseudo-rationalism, pseudoscience, shaming, gossip and propaganda are used for subversion.
And the vehicle for distribution is intellectuals who seek status in and attention return. And the customers are numerous members of the underclasses and women.
We must force an involuntary warranty on information, just as we have on services and goods.
Until Testimonialism we had no method of testing information.
Now we do.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 10:30:00 UTC
(profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.
(profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.
Nov 11, 2016 11:06pm In person i am a gentleman. but i learned a lot from Hayek’s pristine, gentlemanly, german failure with Keynes: never give the enemy an inch out of grace. we aren’t Victorians. this is a street fight. a brawl. and i use broken bottles, brass knuckles, clubs, knives, guns, and every other weapon I can get my hands on. And so do all of us in the various New Right groups. When the left, via Alinsky, took the battle to the streets, they broke with our ancient european tradition and adopted the techniques of the peasantry. that’s’ all well and good for them – until they realized in this election that we gave up on our Victorianism and stooped to their level. And the alt right beat them to a bloody pulp at their own game. Now I am in the process of eviscerating every bit of leftist pseudoscience written in the past 150 years. It will take me a while to build the 100 or so people that can construct propertarian arguments but at that point we are the equivalent of the anti-frankfurt school. And so forgive me if I frequently digress from stoic analytic purity and go slumming, seeking street fights with the left’s kleptocracy of deceit. But I’m looking for skulls to drink from. You, the left, thought you were winning rather than that we were just biding our time, hoping you would learn. Sorry. You didn’t learn. We are failed parents and you’re the family black sheep. You’re the alcoholic, the drug user, the impulsive criminal, and the sociopath. and the social-climbing daughter. That’s all. A cult of kleptocracy. So, We don’t want your consent, your agreement, your approval, or your opinion. We want your silence, submission, punishment, eviction, or death. Which of those we levy against you dependent upon your choice of silence, departure, or death. You cannot meet us on the field of truth. You cannot meet us on the field of propaganda. You cannot meet us on the field of war. You can only meet us in the market of voluntary exchanges. Because that is the only field we will leave you. So we have a message for you: productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange between the classes or it is easier, and cheaper to return you to servitude, serfdom or slavery. You are weaker. You will always be weaker. And we know this. And so do you. You’re done. There won’t be another election for you to win. Because you taught us that you are not ready for adulthood, nor liberty, nor peerage.
Nov 11, 2016 11:06pm In person i am a gentleman. but i learned a lot from Hayek’s pristine, gentlemanly, german failure with Keynes: never give the enemy an inch out of grace. we aren’t Victorians. this is a street fight. a brawl. and i use broken bottles, brass knuckles, clubs, knives, guns, and every other weapon I can get my hands on. And so do all of us in the various New Right groups. When the left, via Alinsky, took the battle to the streets, they broke with our ancient european tradition and adopted the techniques of the peasantry. that’s’ all well and good for them – until they realized in this election that we gave up on our Victorianism and stooped to their level. And the alt right beat them to a bloody pulp at their own game. Now I am in the process of eviscerating every bit of leftist pseudoscience written in the past 150 years. It will take me a while to build the 100 or so people that can construct propertarian arguments but at that point we are the equivalent of the anti-frankfurt school. And so forgive me if I frequently digress from stoic analytic purity and go slumming, seeking street fights with the left’s kleptocracy of deceit. But I’m looking for skulls to drink from. You, the left, thought you were winning rather than that we were just biding our time, hoping you would learn. Sorry. You didn’t learn. We are failed parents and you’re the family black sheep. You’re the alcoholic, the drug user, the impulsive criminal, and the sociopath. and the social-climbing daughter. That’s all. A cult of kleptocracy. So, We don’t want your consent, your agreement, your approval, or your opinion. We want your silence, submission, punishment, eviction, or death. Which of those we levy against you dependent upon your choice of silence, departure, or death. You cannot meet us on the field of truth. You cannot meet us on the field of propaganda. You cannot meet us on the field of war. You can only meet us in the market of voluntary exchanges. Because that is the only field we will leave you. So we have a message for you: productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange between the classes or it is easier, and cheaper to return you to servitude, serfdom or slavery. You are weaker. You will always be weaker. And we know this. And so do you. You’re done. There won’t be another election for you to win. Because you taught us that you are not ready for adulthood, nor liberty, nor peerage.
—“Observation — journalists and other intellectuals freaking out over the outcome of the election reveal that they were never really “students” of society, or even “social critics”, but were instead partisan cheerleaders. Also, it appears that many are completely incapable of asking themselves whether it might be possible that the consensus of the progressive elite in public policy is perhaps neither as accurately descriptive of how the world works or as normatively appealing as they sincerely believe. Rather than critical self-reflection we see outrage, blame, and emotional expression of pain.There are many reasons to be concerned, but the responsible response from intellectuals is to think through rationally, to ask what I was wrong about, try to force yourself to pass an ideological Turning Test, and to recognize that if there are institutional problems the answer requires institutional solutions.Liberal democratic traditions do not work based on the “good” and the “wise” being in power, but were designed so that “bad men can do least harm”. Let’s hope those liberal democratic institutions are still in operation after so many years of sustained critique by progressive intellectuals.Democratic governance (liberalism) is a different beast from bureaucratic governance (progressivism). Bureaucratic governance requires trained experts immune from democratic checks and balances, democratic governance requires responsible citizens and institutions that empower as well as constrain.”– Peter Boettke (NOTE: I would say they are all engaged in customer seeking – a long form of rent seeking. The interesting question not discussed is that because we humans make use of law, religion, and market, but we choose a dominant bias with which to employ them in our social orders, yielding: (1)kin/law, (2)cult/religion, or (3)state/corporatism; Depending upon homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population; to overcome resistance to the creation and preservation of commons – so that why is it that one bias in the order is always better off than the others? And why does not social-criticism and intellectual-decidability limit itself to the order desired by the population? of course, we know the answer is genetic in both desire for construct, and in the expression of that desire for construct as a will to power. I frequently ask the same question: why do economists vary in bias of decidability? for the same reason: austrian-social-science and rule of law preserving sovereignty, freshwater limits of rule of law as a commons against harm, and saltwater abandonment of rule of law in favor of preferential discretion in order to acquire customers for the state. If it isn’t clear to you, then the answer is this: anything other than kin/law is nothing more than an act of war by slower means. – CD )
—“Observation — journalists and other intellectuals freaking out over the outcome of the election reveal that they were never really “students” of society, or even “social critics”, but were instead partisan cheerleaders. Also, it appears that many are completely incapable of asking themselves whether it might be possible that the consensus of the progressive elite in public policy is perhaps neither as accurately descriptive of how the world works or as normatively appealing as they sincerely believe. Rather than critical self-reflection we see outrage, blame, and emotional expression of pain.There are many reasons to be concerned, but the responsible response from intellectuals is to think through rationally, to ask what I was wrong about, try to force yourself to pass an ideological Turning Test, and to recognize that if there are institutional problems the answer requires institutional solutions.Liberal democratic traditions do not work based on the “good” and the “wise” being in power, but were designed so that “bad men can do least harm”. Let’s hope those liberal democratic institutions are still in operation after so many years of sustained critique by progressive intellectuals.Democratic governance (liberalism) is a different beast from bureaucratic governance (progressivism). Bureaucratic governance requires trained experts immune from democratic checks and balances, democratic governance requires responsible citizens and institutions that empower as well as constrain.”– Peter Boettke (NOTE: I would say they are all engaged in customer seeking – a long form of rent seeking. The interesting question not discussed is that because we humans make use of law, religion, and market, but we choose a dominant bias with which to employ them in our social orders, yielding: (1)kin/law, (2)cult/religion, or (3)state/corporatism; Depending upon homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population; to overcome resistance to the creation and preservation of commons – so that why is it that one bias in the order is always better off than the others? And why does not social-criticism and intellectual-decidability limit itself to the order desired by the population? of course, we know the answer is genetic in both desire for construct, and in the expression of that desire for construct as a will to power. I frequently ask the same question: why do economists vary in bias of decidability? for the same reason: austrian-social-science and rule of law preserving sovereignty, freshwater limits of rule of law as a commons against harm, and saltwater abandonment of rule of law in favor of preferential discretion in order to acquire customers for the state. If it isn’t clear to you, then the answer is this: anything other than kin/law is nothing more than an act of war by slower means. – CD )
(by Sock ‘Frank Leibowitz’ ) Counterfeit information, derails calculation in all measures of temporality (immediate, medium term, civilizational, evolutionary). Counterfeit money, which is a special case of information forgery, derails catallatic calculation. Counterfeit theories derail civilizational calculation. Media-academia is to civilizational capital, what central banks are to industrial capital.
(by Sock ‘Frank Leibowitz’ ) Counterfeit information, derails calculation in all measures of temporality (immediate, medium term, civilizational, evolutionary). Counterfeit money, which is a special case of information forgery, derails catallatic calculation. Counterfeit theories derail civilizational calculation. Media-academia is to civilizational capital, what central banks are to industrial capital.