Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • LIES DO NOT REQUIRE INTENT (VIA POSITIVA) BUT FAILURE TO PERFORM DUE DILIGENCE (

    LIES DO NOT REQUIRE INTENT (VIA POSITIVA) BUT FAILURE TO PERFORM DUE DILIGENCE (VIA NEGATIVA).

    (important)

    —“Don’t lies require knowledge and intent? A better description in some cases might be: “Hey, that guy produced a false statement.””—

    I know this is a bit hard to grasp.

    There is a difference between a false statement about that which does not correspond to reality, and an immoral statement that causes an involuntary transfer. The first is false, the second is immoral (theft).

    PROPERTARIANISM’S INCREASE IN SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM BY WAY OF INFORMATION(SPEECH)

    I move agency from conscious intent to genetic bias, so that each of us is responsible for warranty of due diligence against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, loading, framing, overloading supernaturalism, pseudo-rationalism, pseudoscience, and outright deceit.

    Just as we hold people accountable for physical impulses, emotional impulses, we can hold people accountable for intellectual impulses.

    You do not only lie by intent, but by failure to intentionally ensure you do not lie without intent on behalf of your genes.

    Just as, you must perform due diligence on what another tells you before relaying it in order to absolve yourself of conspiracy you must perform due diligence on what your genes and therefore your intuition convey to you before you spread it and are guilty of failure to perform due diligence.

    So yes, I position lying as a failure to ensure you are not lying (via negativa) instead of an intent to lie (via positiva) because I am attempting to incrementally suppress the most influential form of lying: using the anonymity and informational density of the modern world to commit fraud on political scales.

    SPECTRA:

    SUPPRESSION: Murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by disinformation, conspiracy, conversion, immigration, war.

    DUE DILIGENCE: Due diligence in prevention of loss to Air, Water, Land, Monument, Built Capital, Genetic Capital, Institutional Capital, Normative Capital, Market for goods, services, and information.

    IN THE MARKET: Due diligence upon products brought to market in the commons.

    Due diligence upon services brought to market in the commons.

    Due diligence upon information brought to market in the commons

    So yes I am asking you and I and everyone else to increase the labor of policing one another’s actions yet again, just as we have incrementally asked one another to police one another’s actions every time we have incrementally suppressed another form of crime that we have identified by the observation of the parasitism performed by man.

    I hope this helps you understand my arguments.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-21 13:27:00 UTC

  • THE HIERARCHY OF LIES – White Lie – gift a comfort – Grey Lie – obscure a guilt

    THE HIERARCHY OF LIES

    – White Lie – gift a comfort

    – Grey Lie – obscure a guilt

    – Black Lie – obtain a benefit

    – Evil Lie – cause a harm

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-21 12:24:00 UTC

  • “I’ve been saying for a while now “pathological altruism” is not a trait of Arya

    –“I’ve been saying for a while now “pathological altruism” is not a trait of Aryans. It’s a fraudulent virtue signal by the bourgeoisie, attempting to appear like the nobility above them in status, but not having the resources to corroborate that false status signal.”—Josh Jeppson

    Yeah, But it’s so pervasive it’s got to be more than JUST class. I think the behavior is the result of Bourgeoise class interests (everyone is a potential customer), Puritanism (the puritan ethic), Christianity (universalism), and Feminism (or simply the enfranchisement of women – acting as a multiplier on all the above.) So perhaps I see it more as ‘as we raise the volume of the female, we will see evidence of consumption and the commercial exploitation of women’s desire for consumption).

    So of the spectrum of ‘bourgeoise’ influences, I see Fiat Money + Female Enfranchisement as conflationary: merging the market and the state(excellences, capital, limits) overly so, where you see the merchant class as responsible.

    But I feel it’s (a) demilitarization/demasculination of the western male, as much as (b) the rise of the bourgeoise’s influence due to the increase in their economic influence, to (c) the enfransisement of women as peers instead of competitors, and (d) the use of fiat money to enable enfranchised women to work and consume, and (e) the consumption of taxes by putting woman to work and then taxing all their income from the family unit, thereby committing genocide by credit.

    So while consumer values … is that the best description? (is that the same thing as bourgeoise values, or are we talking about the fact that only someone with bourgeoise values would open up government under the ‘ruse’ of equality?).

    hmm…

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-21 05:43:00 UTC

  • #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections?

    #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections? Russia, or George Soros? …. Soros obviously.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-20 00:30:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/822239835092058113

  • #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections?

    #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections? Russia, or George Soros? …. Soros obviously.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-19 19:30:00 UTC

  • MY UNWANTED OPINION ON RIGHT BEHAVIOR AFTER THE TRS DOXX 1) Use your real name.

    MY UNWANTED OPINION ON RIGHT BEHAVIOR AFTER THE TRS DOXX

    1) Use your real name. Man up.

    2) If you wouldn’t say it under your real name, then don’t say it. This prevents you from saying stupid shit and forces you to say smart shit instead. Also, it means stupid people will say a lot less shit, and smart people will say more stuff that isn’t shit.

    3) Ridicule is fun but it’s larping. Arguments make a difference. The rest is community building. We won the last war. Time to win the next one: OBTAIN POWER.

    4) I might be an arrogant f–ck, but honestly Mike is one of the only people in the movement with sufficient IQ for me to have an adult conversation with on relatively equal terms. So, enough said. That’s my criteria. We aren’t going take and hold power with meme’s cartoon frogs and ridicule. Fight the next war.

    5) Natural Law will drive out the bad of any group and pull in the good of any group. And as long as the remaining differences are not reproductively visible enough to cause the creation of a sub-group, then for all intents and purposes we are genetically close enough.

    WHY? BECAUSE THE ORIGIN OF WESTERN DIFFERENCE IS:

    (a) Sovereignty/Heroism, (b) dispute resolution between sovereign men by means of natural law, and an independent (intolerant) judiciary, (c) objective (scientific) testimony, jury, thang, and senate with a monarch (ultimate judge) chosen from the best. (d) profiting by ruling and taxing the underclasses. Meaning freemen, freemen-in-training (soldiers), serfs (partly freemen), slaves (underclasses), and undomesticated animals (everyone not subject to the process of our domestication). We merely handed out the permissions of liberty, freedom, and subsidy to the rest of the human race because employees are cheaper and more profitable than the rest. Meaning we can research and buy more and better weapons and train more soldiers than competitors – and continue to profit from our rule.

    So that’s what makes us compatible: behavior and insufficient visual difference to form a subgroup.

    All we need is natural law with which to prosecute those who violate it, and the will to prosecute them viscously and with pride and joy.

    The enlightenment was a lie. There is no free ride. Violence is unsubstitutable. Only you can provide it. So we all fight for our peoples (world wide) or we are all exterminated and blended into a worldwide caste system leaving most of our people gone or at the bottom. It’s that simple.

    So quit bitching, pussies.

    Fight. Defeat. Rule. Profit. Domesticate.

    And revel in it.

    Curt Doolittle

    (The jews we can integrate our ours. We paid heavily for them. Their problem is cultural. Yeah, there is a genetic thing there. But that can be bred out of the ones who are willing. Their problem is cultural. Our problem is our failure to domesticate because the puritans were just as bad as the jews. So, as a descendent of Puritans, I just look in the f–king mirror for whose families are to blame: mine (ours) .)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 17:44:00 UTC

  • WHY IS KANT UNFORIVABLE? —“Specifically what about Kant is unforgivable?”—Be

    WHY IS KANT UNFORIVABLE?

    —“Specifically what about Kant is unforgivable?”—Benjamin Thurston

    Inventing pseudorationalism that (1) provided an excuse to circumvent the anglo invention of empiricism, (2) created the possibility for the ‘pseudo-rational, post-mystical, fantasy moral literature that we call continental philosophy”, and (3) gave Marx and the cosmopolitans the means of verbal deception necessary to fool so many people by loading, framing, and overloading. (4) and led to the postmoderns, critical theory / political correctness movement.

    In other words, by attempting to restate christianity in pseudorational terms, he created the next generation of mysticism: pseudorationalism as the subsequent means of literary deception, which was then taken up by the jews (cosmopolitans) who combined it with jewish law (poly ethical poly logical) to create pseudoscience: boaz, marx, freud, cantor, mises, {the frankfurt school}, rothbard(libertinism), and strauss(neoconism).

    In other words, he created a technical revolution in religion as a way to lie by suggestion. A way that it has taken me most of my life to counter.

    The british worked so hard to create the scientific enlightenment by observing the record of empirical law, and tried to restore our ancient order (natural law), and then Kant comes along and restates christianity in a new form of mysticism before the empirical project had been completed.

    (PS: It appears that marx knew he was lying by saying something on the order of “…but I have written it all as dialectic (what we call Pilpul) so I can’t be held accountable if I’m wrong…”. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 14:06:00 UTC

  • THIS AS LEGIT? If it’s true I’m making cupcakes and celebrating. Thieves. Guess

    http://worldpoliticus.com/2017/01/16/hillary-clinton-decided-fire-employees-clinton-foundation-done/CONFIRM THIS AS LEGIT?

    If it’s true I’m making cupcakes and celebrating. Thieves.

    Guess i’ll never get my 2m back from them now… lol

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 03:22:00 UTC

  • AVOIDANCE OF EXISTENTIAL GRAMMAR AS COGNITIVE SOLIPSISM: INABILITY TO DISTINGUIS

    AVOIDANCE OF EXISTENTIAL GRAMMAR AS COGNITIVE SOLIPSISM: INABILITY TO DISTINGUISH EXPERIENCE FROM EXISTENCE.

    The deceit is in failing to use EXISTENTIAL GRAMMAR, the same way we use gender-grammar, or temporal grammar, or locational grammar.

    Not sure why it’s so hard for people to grasp this concept.

    Not quite sure why people want to rely on the pretense of ‘god mode’ to make their statements.

    or rather, I think it is a form of cognitive solipsism: inability to separate the self from existence.

    Actually, that’s what I”m going to call it: cognitive solipsism.

    Just as so many women cannot distinquish between experience and consequence, some people cannot distinquish between experience and existence.

    cognitive solipsism.

    Not sure if it’s a developmental disorder, or a failure of maturity, or an uneven evolutionary distribution of intellectual capacity… hmmm…..

    (edit: added)

    Existential Grammar is only important once an individual makes claims to truth because of a premise or conclusion. Now, I’might argue that it’s necessary to ensure you’re not making a mistake, but then, meaning for the purpose of ideation and testimony for the purpose of warrantying due diligence prior to making a truth claim are different things. So I would hope that people would grasp that almost all philosophical arguments I run across are SOPHOMORIC because of nothing more than trickery accomplished by conflation by using the verb to-be to make existential and deducible claims, rather than simply using existential grammar and making the fraudulent claim to existential ‘authority’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-17 13:45:00 UTC

  • REALLY? It never seems to occur to journalists (or many other people) that LOADI

    http://www.salon.com/2017/01/15/dont-think-of-a-rampaging-elephant-linguist-george-lakoff-explains-how-the-democrats-helped-elect-trump/LIARS, REALLY?

    It never seems to occur to journalists (or many other people) that LOADING, FRAMING, OVERLOADING are forms of SUGGESTION ( which means LYING).

    There exists only one truthful form of political speech: cost. And one truthful objective: group evolutionary strategy (persistence.)

    So why does Lakoff (like Chomsky) (a) specialize in language, (b) advise people to use loading, framing, overloading, for the purpose of suggestion (lying) rather than arguments to the contribution to or cost to one’s group evolutionary strategy?

    THATS THE ISSUE: LYING TO OBSCURE THEFT.

    Why do conservatives favor Constitutionalism? Because it’s just a statement of Natural Law of cooperation: The demand for 1) Productive, 2) Fully Informed, 3) Warrantied (skin in the game), 4) Voluntary transfer, 5) limited to productive externality. In other words – the law against parasitism.

    Why do these people advance the violation of natural law consistently, and do so by means of obscurantist lying:

    KRUGMAN, DELONG, STEIGLITZ, LAKOFF, CHOMSKY.

    Group evolutionary strategy in action: lying.

    It’s not complicated.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-15 13:26:00 UTC