“I’ve been saying for a while now “pathological altruism” is not a trait of Arya

–“I’ve been saying for a while now “pathological altruism” is not a trait of Aryans. It’s a fraudulent virtue signal by the bourgeoisie, attempting to appear like the nobility above them in status, but not having the resources to corroborate that false status signal.”—Josh Jeppson

Yeah, But it’s so pervasive it’s got to be more than JUST class. I think the behavior is the result of Bourgeoise class interests (everyone is a potential customer), Puritanism (the puritan ethic), Christianity (universalism), and Feminism (or simply the enfranchisement of women – acting as a multiplier on all the above.) So perhaps I see it more as ‘as we raise the volume of the female, we will see evidence of consumption and the commercial exploitation of women’s desire for consumption).

So of the spectrum of ‘bourgeoise’ influences, I see Fiat Money + Female Enfranchisement as conflationary: merging the market and the state(excellences, capital, limits) overly so, where you see the merchant class as responsible.

But I feel it’s (a) demilitarization/demasculination of the western male, as much as (b) the rise of the bourgeoise’s influence due to the increase in their economic influence, to (c) the enfransisement of women as peers instead of competitors, and (d) the use of fiat money to enable enfranchised women to work and consume, and (e) the consumption of taxes by putting woman to work and then taxing all their income from the family unit, thereby committing genocide by credit.

So while consumer values … is that the best description? (is that the same thing as bourgeoise values, or are we talking about the fact that only someone with bourgeoise values would open up government under the ‘ruse’ of equality?).

hmm…