Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • ALL WARS, MARTIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND CULTURAL ARE COSTLY. AND YOU WILL NO

    ALL WARS, MARTIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND CULTURAL ARE COSTLY. AND YOU WILL NOT GET OFF CHEAPLY.

    Lets be clear. Your little comforting lies need to die too.

    The left won the culture war by telling desirable half truths, after failing at the revolutionary, economic, political, and military wars against Aryanism (domestication of man).

    Thankfully we now have testimonialism.

    The left won in the ancient world by vast immigration from the east, and the imposition of eastern half truths and outright lies, followed by rapid conquest of the mediterranean.

    Thankfully we invented empiricism in the modern world – after humanity’s longest dark age.

    The left won in the prehistoric world by the imposition of half truths and outright lies to mobilize the underclasses against Aryanism. Producing humanity’s first visible dark age.

    Thankfully we invented reason in the ancient world, after our second longest dark age.

    The left won the eastern world by the invention of half truths and outright lies: the supernaturalism that we call ‘organized religion’. They did it in response to THE WEST.

    We had created that industry we call Aryanism: the combination of bronze, horse, wheel, contractualism, sovereignty, and heroism: the use of superior technology to allow elites to domesticate and transcend man from beast to human by the incremental suppression of his innate parasitism.

    THAT MEANS YOU TOO.

    We did not understand our own ‘technology’: Aryanism. But now that we do, we can use it to destroy the ‘left’ (the middle-east, the middle world, the people who lie), and destroy them forever, and end the cycle of our innovation of truth and transcendence, and their innovation of deceit and devolution.

    The consequence of the restoration of the west, and the incremental improvement in our technology of domestication, will restore our civilization, but it will also destroy the lies and half truths imported from the east, that our people use as a ‘crutch’ with which to sate their weaknesses with dreams, delusions, fantasies, and escapism.

    There is only one truth, one perfection, one heroism, one aristocracy, and that is the defeat of falsehood, half truths, parasitism, and infection of the mind of man with the entire portfolio of lies.

    And if this is not good enough for you then you are not worthy of transcendence. You may not be as weak as those who are evil, but you are not as strong as the gods we seek.

    There is no room for the weak among the gods.

    And if you must lie, and seek comforts, rather than act, and enact changes, then you are merely weak. Not weak enough to harm perhaps. but not strong enough to transcend.

    So the price of victory of the middle east (the left) is one that all who cannot face truth without fear, but with pleasure, with inspiration, and with conviction, and with action.

    There are many myths to choose from. But they are not truths. They are simply highly condensed means of making decisions that consistently advance our achievement of perfection in a universe of chaotic information among people who are evil, weak, infected, or unable to choose.

    Eat the weak.

    Conquer.

    Rule.

    Transcend.

    And become the gods we seek.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Law of Nature and of Man

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 15:43:00 UTC

  • THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS —[Cernovich] is also a pathologic

    THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS

    —[Cernovich] is also a pathological liar.– anon..

    No. That criticism doesn’t stand.

    The alt-right was changed from a self identifying label for all reactionaries, to a left-label for WN using Spencer in short order. Just as the left intended.

    That’s why (Me), Cernovich, and PJW, switched to ‘New Right’. To separate from the third rail. I started more than a year ago because I saw it coming. But this year, as it became obvious, people migrated. And we needed that name to stick. Because our enemy is not just the left, but the establishment ‘old right’.

    Compared to the Alt’s, The “New Right” works on advancing the good rather than criticizing the bad. This technique is always superior. Arguing agaist something is not he same as arguing for something. Arguing for specific policy (rule of law) is even better. But in truth, we must argue using ALL methods, since people obtain sentimental meaning from the arguments that they understand. It takes more knowledge to argue for something, and more knowledge to argue for a specific set of institutional changes, but we all ‘feel’ and will act in favor of what we can understand.

    And so ALL OF US had to deal with this change in label given the Spencer-division. Mike isn’t unique, and punching right on nonsense isn’t helpful.

    Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now:

    Spencer is working on WN, (wn)

    The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt)

    RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt)

    PJW is working on media criticism. (new)

    Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there)

    Mike is working “within the system” (new)

    I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new)

    This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals.

    And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments.

    The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions.

    THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION.

    We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your beleive in what can be accomplished. Some wthin the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    ( Mike Cernovich, Richard Spencer, The RAMZPAUL Show, Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson, Eli Harman )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 13:15:00 UTC

  • LIBERTINISM REQUIRES FAITH and FRAUD. Faith in the impossible is not an argument

    LIBERTINISM REQUIRES FAITH and FRAUD.

    Faith in the impossible is not an argument. The question is whether anarchy (the limit of rule of law to physical property) can produce a polity that can survive competition in the market for polities.

    (a) all historical evidence is to the contrary.

    (b) a praxeological construction of such a polity is impossible.

    Hence why there is only one possible means of obtaining a condition of liberty (permission for private property), which is:

    (a) reciprocal sovereignty for property in toto

    (b) natural judge discovered common law of property in toto

    (c) and the only methods of organization possible under sovereignty, natural law, and property in toto: markets in all aspects of life.

    (d) and therefore markets for association, cooperation, for reproduction, for the evolution of specialized portfolios of production, distribution and trade, for the production of commons, and the production of polities that produce specialized portfolios of commons.

    All other claims for anarchy are deducible to the following:

    (a) parasitism (theft) upon the commons produced by others.

    Period. End of argument. No further argument other than lie, fraud, error, or faith is possible.

    Faith, like lie, and fraud, is incompatible with reason, science, truth, and therefore incompatible with argument. Error is however compatible with argument. We are all victims of ignorance and error. Ignorance and error are not a choice.

    Faith is a choice.

    CCM chooses faith in order to justify his error and deceit, in order to justify his fraud, in order to justify his attempt to exist parasitically upon the productivity of others that is invested in the commons, since commons produce multipliers.

    Q.E.D. Thus endeth the lesson.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    (PS: yes I just called CCM, like all libertines, a liar, a fraud, and a thief.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 12:49:00 UTC

  • They use feminine arguments: “My approval is desirable, yet I have no argument o

    They use feminine arguments: “My approval is desirable, yet I have no argument other than the denial of my approval”.

    This is the inverse of our ancient strategy: your approval is undesirable. Your productive exchange is. And if that’s unattainable, your submission is preferable, and failing that, your extermination necessary.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 09:39:00 UTC

  • “It’s amazing that once you spot female shaming it’s really hard to be mad and a

    —“It’s amazing that once you spot female shaming it’s really hard to be mad and almost pointless pursuing the argument. So… Don’t get into arguments with women, just love them – and set limits.”—Gary Knight

    Never forget how few of us have agency.

    The rest are just gene machines capable of language.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 09:35:00 UTC

  • ****”They’re just gene machines: ‘lie, gossip, rally, shame, and form enough of

    ****”They’re just gene machines: ‘lie, gossip, rally, shame, and form enough of an irritant that I can get what I want through cost imposition rather than productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges.”***

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 09:30:00 UTC

  • I mean, look. I could write a bot for ‘arguing’ like these people. Bots only mim

    I mean, look. I could write a bot for ‘arguing’ like these people. Bots only mimic sentience. These people only mimic sentience. They’re just gene machines: ‘lie, gossip, rally, shame, and form enough of an irritant that I can get what I want through cost imposition rather than productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges. I mean, if I can get away with parasitism I not only gain, but I damage my enemy.

    That is (((their))) group evolutionary strategy. It is the evolutionary strategy of our lower class women. Which is why they use it and we so often fall for it.

    They are just parasitic machines. not humans. not really even animals. Just parasitic machines that mimic us.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:51:00 UTC

  • I don’t expect anything intelligent, honest, ethical or moral from someone who t

    I don’t expect anything intelligent, honest, ethical or moral from someone who thinks, looks and acts like a goat-f_cker. I am just using him as a chimp in a circus. The dog cannot refrain from licking his ass. (((Gossips))) can’t help it any more than a woman can bear embarrassment. So they double down over and over again. it’s an animal reaction. You just have to marvel at the consistency of their impulses. And how easy it is to trick them into verbal ass-licking in public.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:46:00 UTC

  • The best way of teaching followers to conduct arguments is to find a useful idio

    The best way of teaching followers to conduct arguments is to find a useful idiot to argue with, and show how to defeat them.

    Because it is the audience who judges defeat in debate, no matter how much groveling and pretense the defeated display.

    It’s more evidence that all members of the (((tribe of pathological liars))) are female: they use feminine arguments: “my approval is desirable, yet I have no argument other than the denial of my approval”.

    Yet, like women, whose freedom is given by the virtue of our kindness, but who can easily be enslaved, they merely demonstrate abuse of our kindness, begging to be beaten, and if beating fail enslaved, and if enslaving fail, killed.

    Violence is our greatest asset.

    With that asset we can create cooperation or predation.

    We create cooperation not by demanding it.

    But by prohibiting everything but it.

    Violence against predation, parasitism, fraud, and deceit is the highest profession of all.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:41:00 UTC

  • “ARGUMENT AD NON-HUMANUM” (argument structure that you might want to use against

    “ARGUMENT AD NON-HUMANUM”

    (argument structure that you might want to use against the gossip/rally/shame crowd) (lols)

    ***I know a member and the effeminate tactics of the (((tribe))) of ‘fraud, lie, gossip, rally, and shame’ when I see one. But as a dog cannot refrain from licking its ass, a monkey cannot refrain from jerking its dick, a woman cannot refrain from solipsism, a member of the (((tribe))) of ‘lie, gossip, rally, and shame’ cannot refrain from the intellectual equivalent of urinating on hydrants and throwing inarticulate verbal feces – at least without significant socialization with ‘betters’. Thankfully a not insignificant number of women and members of the (((tribe))) – with effort – can be trained. Just as a not insignificant number of the underclasses can be trained. ***

    (ps: if only I could train my tribe out of the death spiral of virtue signaling, and conspicuous consumption, and the excuse making of misrepresenting convenience with conviction.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:21:00 UTC