Theme: Deception

  • SOME CONSPIRACY THEORIES ARE TRUE: CREATING THE FED TO SOCIALIZE LOSSES OF BANKS

    SOME CONSPIRACY THEORIES ARE TRUE: CREATING THE FED TO SOCIALIZE LOSSES OF BANKS.

    by Michael Churchill

    A conspiracy theory is defined by four characteristics: (1) a group (2) acting in secret (3) to alter institutions, usurp power, avoid blame, obscure truth, or gain utility (4) at the expense of the common good.

    One event that meets all four criteria is the creation of the Fed — particularly the secret meeting in 1913 at Jekyll Island of representatives of all the big banking interests, who went down there under the guise of going on a hunting trip, in order to form an entity to socialize risk in the banking system, thereby allow banks to run with lower capital ratios.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 10:45:00 UTC

  • “Trump responses to reporters: Troll`ing at Presidential level.—“Robert Gonzal

    —“Trump responses to reporters: Troll`ing at Presidential level.—“Robert Gonzalez


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 20:22:00 UTC

  • Q: is twitter helpful for making rational (the right) arguments, or propagandism

    Q: is twitter helpful for making rational (the right) arguments, or propagandism without arguments(the left)?
    A: Twitter is only useful for propagandizing, not for collaborating. The right collaborates, the left propagandizes. Therefore Gab is unsuited for right (collaborative) discourse.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 15:16:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/5087980310613068

  • Google is the Christian Science Cult of the current generation

    Google is the Christian Science Cult of the current generation.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 02:27:00 UTC

  • “Curt do you believe in any conspiracy theories?”— Aaron Kahland I fall on the

    —“Curt do you believe in any conspiracy theories?”— Aaron Kahland

    I fall on the other side of the spectrum in that I am not sure we are all that much in control of how we follow incentives; and that in general, people feel intuitions to follow certain forms of incentives and they tend to do so whenever the opportunity is left open.

    So we must always suppress all possible incentives that would provide opportunity rather than imagine people are able to resist opportunities and justify them by one means or another.

    So for example, I understand what the advertising, marketing, financial, and political sectors along with women, christians, jews, muslims are all doing. And the European project is my favorite example of a really bad set of incentives. But whether it’s a conspiracy, genetics, or cultural ‘training’ to produce their behaviors is something else.

    I have been wrong about conspiracies that have proven to be true a number of times, precisely because I have so much experience ‘diagnosing’ organizations (business, industries, economies, and institutions) where some set of incentives produce other malincentives that produce unintended consequences.

    But I tend to try to remain in control of my life, and my advantages of birth give me some control over it, so I am probably the subject of malignancies of underestimating ill intentions. Which is what the data says we should expect. My problem is more the obsessive autistic machine in my own head. It colors my judgement more than anything else.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 16:47:00 UTC

  • Bill Joslin The intersection between sanity signals (yes a real thing) and virtu

    Bill Joslin

    The intersection between sanity signals (yes a real thing) and virtue signals defines the Overton window: the range of acceptable opinions one can hold.

    Policing the Overton Window extends from the desire to preserve social capital. By policing the Overton Window, one frames parasitic modes of power as ‘insane’ while acting to preserve social power – the foundation of parasitic behavior.

    Essentially, policing the Overton Window, acts to preserve the opportunity to be a parasite.

    So, why would you do this?

    Sifting fact from Fantasy only requires truth, not signalling. And by truthful methods most geopolitical “conspirators’ are guilty, as are most academic “conspirators”.

    By this measure, the conspiracies which pan out are pushed into “insanity signals”. Powerplays and human animal husbandry, I suspect, are the opportunities one seeks for himself.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 16:22:00 UTC

  • “Once virtue signaling ceases to pay, they give up.”— Michael Churchill Truth

    —“Once virtue signaling ceases to pay, they give up.”— Michael Churchill

    Truth ends Virtue Signaling.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 12:32:00 UTC

  • ON CONSPIRACY THEORIES DEFINITION A conspiracy theory is defined by four charact

    ON CONSPIRACY THEORIES

    DEFINITION

    A conspiracy theory is defined by four characteristics: (1) a group (2) acting in secret (3) to alter institutions, usurp power, avoid blame, obscure truth, or gain utility (4) at the expense of the common good.

    COMMON

    At least 50 percent of the population believe in at least one conspiracy theory. The best predictor of belief in a conspiracy theory is belief in other conspiracy theories. The more highly educated a participant, the less likely they are to believe conspiracy theories.

    Debunking conspiracy theories leads to a “backfire effect.” Efforts to debunk inaccurate political information leave people more convinced that false information is true than they would have otherwise.

    CAUSES

    They feel a lack of control over their lives. If people feel they don’t have control over a situation, they’ll try to make sense of it and find out what happened. Ostracism increases superstition and belief in conspiracies. And it’s not because the isolation is making them insane—it’s really just a search for more meaning in life. The effort of sense-making leads them to connect dots that aren’t necessarily connected in reality. Conversely, feeling a sense of control protects against believing conspiracy theories. If you give people a feeling of control, then they are less inclined to believe those conspiracy theories.

    CONFIRMATION BIAS – SEARCH FOR CONTROL

    Human beings have a very natural tendency to take in information that fits their own perspective of the world. And we tend to reject information or reject evidence that we disagree with. And we do that for a very simple reason. We don’t like it when we feel wrong. We don’t like it when people tell us we’re wrong because that damages our psychological well-being. We don’t like thinking that our view of the world, our perspective of the world is incorrect.

    So what tends to happen is that we look for information; we look for evidence that fits what we already know or what we already believe, and we try to avoid information or evidence that we either disagree with or that we know doesn’t fit with our perspective.

    TESTING FOR MENTAL ILLNESS

    As far as I know, if you use the serial-definition method rather than cold surveys, give the above definition, give examples of those that were true and false, and categorize a selection of conspiracy theories by the following list, you would find most people are less crazy than they appear.

    0) Unlikely or simply false.

    1) Misunderstanding of events to obtain ‘sensible world’

    2) Intentional misrepresentation of events for attention and ‘sensible world’.

    3) external consequences of common interest

    4) conspiracy of common interest (following natural incentives without intention of doing bad)

    5) conspiracy of common interest in self protection.

    6) conspiracy to commit harm in excuse for creating some greater good (military nonsense).

    7) conspiracy to commit harm to achieve personal or group ends.

    8) conspiracy to achieve power for a group.

    —“Incentives drive interest which creates intent. Conspiracies look at the end result and call foul play as opposed to using full accounting and stripping back the effect from the cause.”—Nick Zito

    Curt

    (compiled from various mainstream sources)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:17:00 UTC

  • Going through the top ten conspiracy theories with a relative and after you get

    Going through the top ten conspiracy theories with a relative and after you get through the expression of emotional frustration the end result is ‘unintended consequences of common interest’, ‘conspiracy of common interests’, not in fact ‘conspiracies of intent’, and Which is what I want to explore. I think it’s possible to separate loonies from skeptics by asking the questions rationally.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:01:00 UTC

  • So, the question is, *Who and what institutions, disciplines, and professions ar

    So, the question is, *Who and what institutions, disciplines, and professions are perpetuating justificationism?*


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 14:47:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895295429276991489

    Reply addressees: @bryan_caplan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/863077790605877250


    IN REPLY TO:

    @bryan_caplan

    Overfitting explains everything.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/863077790605877250