—“Right-wing “bohemians” will never get it. Their sorry attempts at justifying delving into magic idealism, occultism and other forms of filth. They’re clueless donkeys and dumb as a bag of rocks.” — Göran Dahl
Theme: Deception
-
Zizek is a purveyor of critique (by his own admission) and offers nothing but so
Zizek is a purveyor of critique (by his own admission) and offers nothing but solace and false hope of insulation from reality to the weak – as did version one of the Abrahamists with the false promise of hope after death. At least the buddhists simply teach you to ignore it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 21:05:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971129615434600448
Reply addressees: @HeritageNLegacy @No2Sovereignty @LueYee @JWilliamXIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971128852771569664
IN REPLY TO:
@HeritageNLegacy
@curtdoolittle @No2Sovereignty @LueYee @JWilliamXIII Man, you need some Heidegger or even Žižek. Lay off the vulgar materialism ideology
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971128852771569664
-
That’s simply not true. All of human life is explicable is trivially simple form
That’s simply not true. All of human life is explicable is trivially simple form (I have done it). What is complex is all the lies, deceits, and fairly tales we tell to ‘cheat’ upon that simplicity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 17:47:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971079856971755521
Reply addressees: @No2Sovereignty @HeritageNLegacy @LueYee @JWilliamXIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970842208105459713
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970842208105459713
-
I disdain this kind of cynical scoffing nihilism where every higher concept is c
—I disdain this kind of cynical scoffing nihilism where every higher concept is considered a lie or fairy tale. “Art? Beauty? These are just conceits.” The ideological materialist has to really strain trying to get the human square into the Darwinian hole. It’s ironically absurd.”—
There is zero difficulty ‘squaring’ human existence with physics. It’s not absurd at all. Its tediously simple. Art and Beauty are also trivial to explain. To say that knowing alone denies us the emotional rewards of loading and framing is certain. But not inexplicable.
Truth Proper provides agency, while comforting falsehoods, no matter how enjoyable merely make us feel false satisfaction for failing to create agency.
All of our narrative fantasies are just human bird song: the attempt to attract status, friends, and mates, with promise of distractions from a reality in which they cannot compete.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 16:11:00 UTC
-
by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems fro
by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems from its power to persuade. Why I see it as an arguing for power. Sure fictions and myths, archetypes and transcendent ideal motivate and guide human behaviour, but so does law. Advocacy as mean to effect change (a spin or assumption from living in democracies and markets) logically leads to persuasion by information opposed to persuasion by force. A civilization doesn’t require fictions, it requires rule of law.”– -
by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems fro
by Bill Joslin
–“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems from its power to persuade. Why I see it as an arguing for power. Sure fictions and myths, archetypes and transcendent ideal motivate and guide human behaviour, but so does law. Advocacy as mean to effect change (a spin or assumption from living in democracies and markets) logically leads to persuasion by information opposed to persuasion by force.
A civilization doesn’t require fictions, it requires rule of law.”–
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-05 09:09:00 UTC
-
by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems fro
by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems from its power to persuade. Why I see it as an arguing for power. Sure fictions and myths, archetypes and transcendent ideal motivate and guide human behaviour, but so does law. Advocacy as mean to effect change (a spin or assumption from living in democracies and markets) logically leads to persuasion by information opposed to persuasion by force. A civilization doesn’t require fictions, it requires rule of law.”– -
I did answer. 1) The left (secular priesthood) pursued power by its historical m
I did answer. 1) The left (secular priesthood) pursued power by its historical means: moral fictionalism. The right (aristocracy) has practiced it by their usual means (law) since at least 700ad (bipartite manorialism and aggressive hanging), if not 2300bc. (land constraints).
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 15:26:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970319506013872130
Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970312347976810498
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970312347976810498
-
The Left uses gossip, ridicule, shaming, and rallying to demand Reciprocity of t
The Left uses gossip, ridicule, shaming, and rallying to demand Reciprocity of the Right. But they do not in turn reciprocate, and instead engage in nothing but special pleading (inequality and ir-reciprocity) thereby using the Right’s Ethic of Reciprocity to undermine it. #Trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 13:02:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970283384697184256
-
The Abrahamic Deceits of The Supernatural Ancient World vs Pseudoscientific Mode
The Abrahamic Deceits of The Supernatural Ancient World vs Pseudoscientific Modern World were fabricated and spread by gossip for the sole purpose of undermining Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, and Meritocracy. ie: Left dysgenics vs Right Eugenics. #Trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 12:54:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970281355136393217