Theme: Deception
-
The Problem Is He Used Little Green Men Instead Of Just Coming Out And Stating It.
(From ukrainian news “Ukraine Today”) There was necessary global security and russian strategic security at stake. It would have been trivially easy for Putin to just say what he was doing, do it, and offer Ukraine gas discounts 50 or 90 years, as compensation. He could have easily just outright said “our military industrial facilities are in the donbas, and were a russian strategic investment. While we do not want to interfere with borders, we have a national defense issue that we must solve, and that is to return the donbas manufacturing capacity to russian hands. RUSSIA’S ENTIRE HISTORICAL PROBLEM IS THAT SHE WILL NOT ENGAGE IN TRUTHFUL SPEECH – EVEN WHEN SHE IS RIGHT. This is the primary reason for Russian people’s economic and political Lagging. The Russians have always been lower trust than eastern and western europeans. The soviets only made it much worse by institutionalizing lying at all levels of society. THE SOLUTION IS SIMPLE: WHEN YOU ARE RIGHT – JUST TELL THE DAMNED TRUTH. As an immigrant to Ukraine, I said this at the time, and I have been saying this since then. THE RUSSIAN PROBLEM IS THAT THEY CONSIDER DECEIT HONORABLE RATHER THAN IMMORAL. -
The salted knife of maternal guilt, wielded with flourish, venom, and glee. 😉
The salted knife of maternal guilt, wielded with flourish, venom, and glee. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-07 16:32:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971423386428690432
-
(humor) A Woman. A Typical New England Liberal. A passionate participant in ‘The
(humor) A Woman. A Typical New England Liberal. A passionate participant in ‘The Narrative’. So, I put Parental Controls on MSNBC. Out of the blue, it asks for a code. I ask “what do they put on that channel that is harmful to children?” And, “why would they feel the need to censor MSNBC?” No suspicion whatsoever. Unfortunately I couldn’t control myself…. ha…. ha, ha, ha.. aaaaaaah ha ha ha ha! omg….. I can’t breathe. lol -
(humor) A Woman. A Typical New England Liberal. A passionate participant in ‘The
(humor)
A Woman. A Typical New England Liberal.
A passionate participant in ‘The Narrative’.
So, I put Parental Controls on MSNBC.
Out of the blue, it asks for a code.
I ask “what do they put on that channel that is harmful to children?” And, “why would they feel the need to censor MSNBC?”
No suspicion whatsoever.
Unfortunately I couldn’t control myself….
ha…. ha, ha, ha.. aaaaaaah ha ha ha ha!
omg….. I can’t breathe. lol
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-07 09:13:00 UTC
-
(humor) A Woman. A Typical New England Liberal. A passionate participant in ‘The
(humor) A Woman. A Typical New England Liberal. A passionate participant in ‘The Narrative’. So, I put Parental Controls on MSNBC. Out of the blue, it asks for a code. I ask “what do they put on that channel that is harmful to children?” And, “why would they feel the need to censor MSNBC?” No suspicion whatsoever. Unfortunately I couldn’t control myself…. ha…. ha, ha, ha.. aaaaaaah ha ha ha ha! omg….. I can’t breathe. lol -
The Market Demonstrated Via Positiva Failed
The problem is that people can intuit what is correct about many things that are wrong. You can (because you’re in the same spectrum as peterson and I) easily do that. When I was in college I could easily do that. But the problem we have not so much education in what is right, but preventing education in what is wrong. YOu are, and many libertarian and right’s are, intuiting from peterson what others intuit from postmodernists, marxists, pseudosciences, and conspiracy theories. It is one thing to provide a means of teaching, but it is quite another to provide a means of preventing false teaching. The market for false teaching has not been subject to incremental suppression, particularly since the industrial revolution – for the simple reason that they could not find a way to both suppress it and tolerate christianity (had we still been pagan it would have been possible). I sympathize with via-positiva intuitionistic agreement, but that tells us only that the individual possesses the preconceptions by which to sympathize with it – and not competing preconceptions and intuitions. That’s the evidence. Period. Ergo, it really doesn’t matter a shit-bit because the market for narratives has maintained a superior demand for fictionalisms (falsehoods) that justify the dysgenic majority. The FACTS are, the EVIDENCE IS, that we (aristocracy) loses any market in which we cannot incrementally suppress parasitism, for the simple reason that parasitism is preferable, emotionally, intellectually, and actionably to the vast, unproductive, majority. So while via-positiva storytelling is a cheap means of youth-education (and therefore adult regulation), and will train youth to seek opportunities within the limits of the suppressed parasitisms, the market has demonstrated that truth and law (the west) or fiction(religion) and law (the rest of the world), are the only POSSIBLE means of transformation of a polity. All that matters is law. The more correspondent the law the lower the friction the higher the velocity. The rest is amusement for children, women, and priests. The problem is, children, women, and priests can increase the costs such that aristocracy (soldiers, scientists, and judges) lack the will to impose law by truth. Why? Because in the end, only soldiers matter. Because only soldiers choose. What does that mean? It all begins with the Militia. (Thus endeth the lesson) -
THE MARKET DEMONSTRATED VIA POSITIVA FAILED The problem is that people can intui
THE MARKET DEMONSTRATED VIA POSITIVA FAILED
The problem is that people can intuit what is correct about many things that are wrong. You can (because you’re in the same spectrum as peterson and I) easily do that. When I was in college I could easily do that. But the problem we have not so much education in what is right, but preventing education in what is wrong. YOu are, and many libertarian and right’s are, intuiting from peterson what others intuit from postmodernists, marxists, pseudosciences, and conspiracy theories.
It is one thing to provide a means of teaching, but it is quite another to provide a means of preventing false teaching.
The market for false teaching has not been subject to incremental suppression, particularly since the industrial revolution – for the simple reason that they could not find a way to both suppress it and tolerate christianity (had we still been pagan it would have been possible).
I sympathize with via-positiva intuitionistic agreement, but that tells us only that the individual possesses the preconceptions by which to sympathize with it – and not competing preconceptions and intuitions.
That’s the evidence. Period.
Ergo, it really doesn’t matter a shit-bit because the market for narratives has maintained a superior demand for fictionalisms (falsehoods) that justify the dysgenic majority. The FACTS are, the EVIDENCE IS, that we (aristocracy) loses any market in which we cannot incrementally suppress parasitism, for the simple reason that parasitism is preferable, emotionally, intellectually, and actionably to the vast, unproductive, majority.
So while via-positiva storytelling is a cheap means of youth-education (and therefore adult regulation), and will train youth to seek opportunities within the limits of the suppressed parasitisms, the market has demonstrated that truth and law (the west) or fiction(religion) and law (the rest of the world), are the only POSSIBLE means of transformation of a polity.
All that matters is law. The more correspondent the law the lower the friction the higher the velocity.
The rest is amusement for children, women, and priests.
The problem is, children, women, and priests can increase the costs such that aristocracy (soldiers, scientists, and judges) lack the will to impose law by truth.
Why?
Because in the end, only soldiers matter. Because only soldiers choose.
What does that mean?
It all begins with the Militia.
(Thus endeth the lesson)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-07 07:18:00 UTC
-
The Market Demonstrated Via Positiva Failed
The problem is that people can intuit what is correct about many things that are wrong. You can (because you’re in the same spectrum as peterson and I) easily do that. When I was in college I could easily do that. But the problem we have not so much education in what is right, but preventing education in what is wrong. YOu are, and many libertarian and right’s are, intuiting from peterson what others intuit from postmodernists, marxists, pseudosciences, and conspiracy theories. It is one thing to provide a means of teaching, but it is quite another to provide a means of preventing false teaching. The market for false teaching has not been subject to incremental suppression, particularly since the industrial revolution – for the simple reason that they could not find a way to both suppress it and tolerate christianity (had we still been pagan it would have been possible). I sympathize with via-positiva intuitionistic agreement, but that tells us only that the individual possesses the preconceptions by which to sympathize with it – and not competing preconceptions and intuitions. That’s the evidence. Period. Ergo, it really doesn’t matter a shit-bit because the market for narratives has maintained a superior demand for fictionalisms (falsehoods) that justify the dysgenic majority. The FACTS are, the EVIDENCE IS, that we (aristocracy) loses any market in which we cannot incrementally suppress parasitism, for the simple reason that parasitism is preferable, emotionally, intellectually, and actionably to the vast, unproductive, majority. So while via-positiva storytelling is a cheap means of youth-education (and therefore adult regulation), and will train youth to seek opportunities within the limits of the suppressed parasitisms, the market has demonstrated that truth and law (the west) or fiction(religion) and law (the rest of the world), are the only POSSIBLE means of transformation of a polity. All that matters is law. The more correspondent the law the lower the friction the higher the velocity. The rest is amusement for children, women, and priests. The problem is, children, women, and priests can increase the costs such that aristocracy (soldiers, scientists, and judges) lack the will to impose law by truth. Why? Because in the end, only soldiers matter. Because only soldiers choose. What does that mean? It all begins with the Militia. (Thus endeth the lesson) -
“Right-wing “bohemians” will never get it. Their sorry attempts at justifying de
—“Right-wing “bohemians” will never get it. Their sorry attempts at justifying delving into magic idealism, occultism and other forms of filth. They’re clueless donkeys and dumb as a bag of rocks.” — Göran Dahl -
“Right-wing “bohemians” will never get it. Their sorry attempts at justifying de
—“Right-wing “bohemians” will never get it. Their sorry attempts at justifying delving into magic idealism, occultism and other forms of filth. They’re clueless donkeys and dumb as a bag of rocks.” — Göran Dahl
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 21:16:00 UTC