And why does quora TOLERATE questions that insult white people – by the truckload?
https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Why-does-Quora-ban-questions-about-white-supremacy-or-white-racism-but-accepts-questions-which-puts-down-Asians
Theme: Deception
-
—-”What do you think is the hardest thing to do?”—- To tolerate the Vox Populi’s
—-”What do you think is the hardest thing to do?”—-
To tolerate the Vox Populi’s universal Dunning-Kruger confidence, moral indignation, and petty righteousness. People run with scissors of ignorance. Everything else is just a matter of doing a bit of time and effort.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 23:14:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968987840502788096
-
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz. -
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi
(to paul krugman via twitter)
What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 22:09:00 UTC
-
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz. -
In general, I make painfully accurate sense. It’s my job. Now, we have rights of
In general, I make painfully accurate sense. It’s my job. Now, we have rights of reciprocity – sure. Just as we have the right to boycott, sue,and prosecute people who commit fraud in the distribution of goods,services, and information. And that was my argument: reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 14:00:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968848421191933953
Reply addressees: @Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846718707163141
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846718707163141
-
Once you understand the technique it’s obvious. In Paul’s case he has made a car
Once you understand the technique it’s obvious. In Paul’s case he has made a career out of cherry-picking the capital he measures, and claiming opponents are stupid, naive, or immoral. When he’s just cunning, immoral, and deceptive.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 13:53:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846688659103744
Reply addressees: @Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846077846806528
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman Paul doesn’t try to make sense. He tries to pursue his western-hatred agenda. And he does it as has every other generation of Fictionalists (Theologians, Rationalist Philosophers, Pseudoscientists), by half truths forcing suggestion using overloading to invoke moral sentiments.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/968846077846806528
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman Paul doesn’t try to make sense. He tries to pursue his western-hatred agenda. And he does it as has every other generation of Fictionalists (Theologians, Rationalist Philosophers, Pseudoscientists), by half truths forcing suggestion using overloading to invoke moral sentiments.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/968846077846806528
-
Paul doesn’t try to make sense. He tries to pursue his western-hatred agenda. An
Paul doesn’t try to make sense. He tries to pursue his western-hatred agenda. And he does it as has every other generation of Fictionalists (Theologians, Rationalist Philosophers, Pseudoscientists), by half truths forcing suggestion using overloading to invoke moral sentiments.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 13:51:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846077846806528
Reply addressees: @Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968840221151330305
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968840221151330305
-
“The west turned the dominance hierarchy into a militant competence hierarchy. T
–“The west turned the dominance hierarchy into a militant competence hierarchy. The rest are still “lying” their way through a dominance hierarchy.” — Nick Heywood
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 12:57:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968832455577886720
-
THE NYT has done more to destroy western civilization than any other publication
THE NYT has done more to destroy western civilization than any other publication.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-27 17:46:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968542964141215750
Reply addressees: @nytimes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968157996189560833
IN REPLY TO:
@nytimes
This is a chance to hold power to account. https://t.co/PGBV0M34gn
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968157996189560833