Theme: Deception
-
Rationalism vs Falsificationism
Rationalism = Excuse. Falsificationism = Necessity 1) You know, I specialize in the methods of deception, particularly by moral appeal and hazard: (a) Abrahamism: Pilpul via-positiva (Excuse) vs Critique via-negativa (Ridicule) – vs – (b) Aryanism: Law via-positiva (“I May”) vs Science via-Negativa (Survival from testing) 2) Once you see Pilpul and Critique as techniques you’ll understand we now need a third defense against falsehood: 1) Cognitive Biases, 2) Rhetorical Fallacies, 3) Justificationary Deceits. … 3) Where those justificationary deceits include: appeal to reasonableness, appeal to consideration, appeal to empathy, appeal to optimistic outcomes, with loading, framing, selectivity, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, propaganda, and The Fictionalisms. 4) What can I warranty ethics (Militia Ethics), vs what can I make excuses for (Ghetto ethics). -
Rationalism vs Falsificationism
Rationalism = Excuse. Falsificationism = Necessity 1) You know, I specialize in the methods of deception, particularly by moral appeal and hazard: (a) Abrahamism: Pilpul via-positiva (Excuse) vs Critique via-negativa (Ridicule) – vs – (b) Aryanism: Law via-positiva (“I May”) vs Science via-Negativa (Survival from testing) 2) Once you see Pilpul and Critique as techniques you’ll understand we now need a third defense against falsehood: 1) Cognitive Biases, 2) Rhetorical Fallacies, 3) Justificationary Deceits. … 3) Where those justificationary deceits include: appeal to reasonableness, appeal to consideration, appeal to empathy, appeal to optimistic outcomes, with loading, framing, selectivity, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, propaganda, and The Fictionalisms. 4) What can I warranty ethics (Militia Ethics), vs what can I make excuses for (Ghetto ethics). -
4) What can I warranty ethics (Militia Ethics), vs what can I make excuses for (
4) What can I warranty ethics (Militia Ethics), vs what can I make excuses for (Ghetto ethics).
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 18:22:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002616325825552386
Reply addressees: @Meaningness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
IN REPLY TO:
@Meaningness
Definition of “rationalism” from the Eggplant book draft.
If you identify as a rationalist, I’m curious whether you find this accurate, and if not, why not? https://t.co/2cvo7478fjOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
-
3) Where those justificationary deceits include: appeal to reasonableness, appea
3) Where those justificationary deceits include: appeal to reasonableness, appeal to consideration, appeal to empathy, appeal to optimistic outcomes, with loading, framing, selectivity, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, propaganda, and The Fictionalisms.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 18:21:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002616085953343489
Reply addressees: @Meaningness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
IN REPLY TO:
@Meaningness
Definition of “rationalism” from the Eggplant book draft.
If you identify as a rationalist, I’m curious whether you find this accurate, and if not, why not? https://t.co/2cvo7478fjOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
-
2) Once you see Pilpul and Critique as techniques you’ll understand we now need
2) Once you see Pilpul and Critique as techniques you’ll understand we now need a third defense against falsehood: 1) Cognitive Biases, 2) Rhetorical Fallacies, 3) Justificationary Deceits. …
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 18:20:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002615869174927360
Reply addressees: @Meaningness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
IN REPLY TO:
@Meaningness
Definition of “rationalism” from the Eggplant book draft.
If you identify as a rationalist, I’m curious whether you find this accurate, and if not, why not? https://t.co/2cvo7478fjOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
-
1) You know, I specialize in the methods of deception, particularly by moral app
1) You know, I specialize in the methods of deception, particularly by moral appeal and hazard:
(a) Abrahamism: Pilpul via-positiva (Excuse) vs Critique via-negativa (Ridicule)
– vs –
(b) Aryanism: Law via-positiva (“I May”) vs Science via-Negativa (Survival from testing)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 18:20:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002615772596834312
Reply addressees: @Meaningness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
IN REPLY TO:
@Meaningness
Definition of “rationalism” from the Eggplant book draft.
If you identify as a rationalist, I’m curious whether you find this accurate, and if not, why not? https://t.co/2cvo7478fjOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993602725316186112
-
Rationalism = Excuse. Falsificationism = Necessity 1) You know, I specialize in
Rationalism = Excuse. Falsificationism = Necessity
1) You know, I specialize in the methods of deception, particularly by moral appeal and hazard:
(a) Abrahamism: Pilpul via-positiva (Excuse) vs Critique via-negativa (Ridicule)
– vs –
(b) Aryanism: Law via-positiva (“I May”) vs Science via-Negativa (Survival from testing)
2) Once you see Pilpul and Critique as techniques you’ll understand we now need a third defense against falsehood: 1) Cognitive Biases, 2) Rhetorical Fallacies, 3) Justificationary Deceits. …
3) Where those justificationary deceits include: appeal to reasonableness, appeal to consideration, appeal to empathy, appeal to optimistic outcomes, with loading, framing, selectivity, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, propaganda, and The Fictionalisms.
4) What can I warranty ethics (Militia Ethics), vs what can I make excuses for (Ghetto ethics).
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 14:24:00 UTC
-
I want to work on constant relations and grammar today, but I feel inspired to w
I want to work on constant relations and grammar today, but I feel inspired to write about lying.
I also have a piece I want to write about how women think differently for men, and how men over estimate agreement with women, and therefore how we humans in general overestimate agreement with one another, and why in the end, this is an incredibly good thing. 😉
I’m also reading up on neurotransmitters so that I can give a brief overview of how personality differences emerge. So I guess that’s four topics I’m working on right now.
Plus the fifth topic that I have rolling around in my head is counter-signaling the male desire for escapism as some sort of heroism or virtue rather than admission of lack of agency – and how to get that agency.
So I have to have enough coffee to make one of those things happen… lol
Otherwise I’m going to listen to the birds and watch the rain. lol
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 10:28:00 UTC
-
My answer to Are verbally fluent intellectuals often handicapped by their except
My answer to Are verbally fluent intellectuals often handicapped by their exceptional verbal ability because it allows them to subconsciously manipulate their language to effortlessly produce verbally persuasive but otherwise questionable arguments? https://www.quora.com/Are-verbally-fluent-intellectuals-often-handicapped-by-their-exceptional-verbal-ability-because-it-allows-them-to-subconsciously-manipulate-their-language-to-effortlessly-produce-verbally-persuasive-but-otherwise/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 00:33:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002347328500588545
-
SHIFTS WITH (A) INTELLIGENCE, AND (B) WEALTH Contrary to Pinker’s “Better Angels
https://www.quora.com/Are-verbally-fluent-intellectuals-often-handicapped-by-their-exceptional-verbal-ability-because-it-allows-them-to-subconsciously-manipulate-their-language-to-effortlessly-produce-verbally-persuasive-but-otherwise/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=2bbe0b99&srid=u4Qvhttps://www.quora.com/Are-verbally-fluent-intellectuals-often-handicapped-by-their-exceptional-verbal-ability-because-it-allows-them-to-subconsciously-manipulate-their-language-to-effortlessly-produce-verbally-persuasive-but-otherwise/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=2bbe0b99&srid=u4QvIMMORALITY SHIFTS WITH (A) INTELLIGENCE, AND (B) WEALTH
Contrary to Pinker’s “Better Angels of Our Nature”, all that occurs as we either gain intelligence or gain income, is that we** shift the means of predation** upon others up the chain of complexity and indirection.
Here is a simple series of the means by which we commonly increase the complexity of parasitism and predation upon one another:
Murder -> Violence -> Theft -> Fraud -> Fraud by Hazard Creation -> Free Riding -> Privatization of Commons, Socialization of Losses -> Fraud, Hazard and Privatization through Financialization -> Fraud, Hazard and Privatization through Proceduralization -> Fraud, hazard, and Privatization by Damage to the Informational Commons (“propaganda, advertising, public intellectual pseudoscience”) -> Material Conspiracy -> Political Rent Seeking -> Political Corruption -> Coup or Conquest.
So yes. And some well known groups specialize in persuasive but hazard producing pseudoscience, pseudorationalism, and propaganda. Particularly by utilizing the frailty of the law to ally with the government against the people.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 20:33:00 UTC