Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Abrahamism

    ABRAHAMISM: 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”) 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance. 5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance. 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods. 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods. 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge. 9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood.

  • A Parasitic Priest Class

    by Neil A. Bucklew The problem with abrahamism is its murky interpretable nature that allows a parasitic priest class to form. There are good ideas within christianity along side bad ones, as well as a lot of unnecessary fiction. the family structure of the west is not laid out in the bible, where semitic polygamy is still written. western “christian tradition”, is not wholly guided by the bible, but mixed with unspoken elements of western society. I do not see how you can look at Rome and its pagan culture or other pagans and see a feminized culture. They had the same basic monogamous culture with some variation on details. women and men had clear and specific duties more than loose rules of thumb such as “love your wife respect your husband”. To say Christianiy rescued Europe from the chaos of pagan matriarchy is quite a stretch. It would be more accurate to say that patriarchal people used and transformed christianity in their struggles for dominance. There is a huge amount of western behavior during christian times that cannot be explained by any christian teachings or what is written en the bible. the foundations of what is called the christian work ethic are hardly to be seen in the bible, which teaches that work is the result of a curse we must suffer through. the foundations of that work ethic is in the biology and pre christian culture. the “incremental suppresion” that curt talks about especially during the manorial period, was quite often about NOT helping those who would not work and participate and letting them die. no need to kill them, just let nature take its course. christian charity consistently undermines this.

  • A Parasitic Priest Class

    by Neil A. Bucklew The problem with abrahamism is its murky interpretable nature that allows a parasitic priest class to form. There are good ideas within christianity along side bad ones, as well as a lot of unnecessary fiction. the family structure of the west is not laid out in the bible, where semitic polygamy is still written. western “christian tradition”, is not wholly guided by the bible, but mixed with unspoken elements of western society. I do not see how you can look at Rome and its pagan culture or other pagans and see a feminized culture. They had the same basic monogamous culture with some variation on details. women and men had clear and specific duties more than loose rules of thumb such as “love your wife respect your husband”. To say Christianiy rescued Europe from the chaos of pagan matriarchy is quite a stretch. It would be more accurate to say that patriarchal people used and transformed christianity in their struggles for dominance. There is a huge amount of western behavior during christian times that cannot be explained by any christian teachings or what is written en the bible. the foundations of what is called the christian work ethic are hardly to be seen in the bible, which teaches that work is the result of a curse we must suffer through. the foundations of that work ethic is in the biology and pre christian culture. the “incremental suppresion” that curt talks about especially during the manorial period, was quite often about NOT helping those who would not work and participate and letting them die. no need to kill them, just let nature take its course. christian charity consistently undermines this.

  • ABRAHAMISM: 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdo

    ABRAHAMISM:

    1) Restatement of Myth as History

    2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law

    3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”)

    4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance.

    5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance.

    6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods.

    7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods.

    8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge.

    9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 17:57:00 UTC

  • by Neil A. Bucklew The problem with abrahamism is its murky interpretable nature

    by Neil A. Bucklew

    The problem with abrahamism is its murky interpretable nature that allows a parasitic priest class to form.

    There are good ideas within christianity along side bad ones, as well as a lot of unnecessary fiction. the family structure of the west is not laid out in the bible, where semitic polygamy is still written. western “christian tradition”, is not wholly guided by the bible, but mixed with unspoken elements of western society.

    I do not see how you can look at Rome and its pagan culture or other pagans and see a feminized culture. They had the same basic monogamous culture with some variation on details. women and men had clear and specific duties more than loose rules of thumb such as “love your wife respect your husband”.

    To say Christianiy rescued Europe from the chaos of pagan matriarchy is quite a stretch. It would be more accurate to say that patriarchal people used and transformed christianity in their struggles for dominance. There is a huge amount of western behavior during christian times that cannot be explained by any christian teachings or what is written en the bible. the foundations of what is called the christian work ethic are hardly to be seen in the bible, which teaches that work is the result of a curse we must suffer through. the foundations of that work ethic is in the biology and pre christian culture.

    the “incremental suppresion” that curt talks about especially during the manorial period, was quite often about NOT helping those who would not work and participate and letting them die. no need to kill them, just let nature take its course. christian charity consistently undermines this.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 14:45:00 UTC

  • Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul

    Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul can never tell us anything except deception is possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 14:27:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002919589943107584

  • There are Lawgivers, Historians, and Scientists, in and then there are Prophets.

    There are Lawgivers, Historians, and Scientists, in and then there are Prophets. The former errs. The latter lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 13:32:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002905804654211076

  • GRAMMARS ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH You can always make excuses for everything. Hence

    GRAMMARS ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH

    You can always make excuses for everything. Hence Astrology, Numerology, Theology, Pilpul and Critique, Rationalism, Formal Logic, Moralizing, Legislative Argument, postmodern (relativism) argument, and all variations thereof.

    All of these techniques consist of the Fictionalism “Pseudorationalism”.

    Just as Marxism, Socialism, Frankfurt-ism, Feminism consist of pseudosciences.

    Just as all Magic, Superstition, Religion, Occult, Mysticism consist of the fictionalism “Supernaturalism”.

    You can only testify one continuous grammar: consistently, correspondently, operationally, completely, and coherently.

    That means the only ‘Prophet’ that was not lying was Aristotle.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 10:39:00 UTC

  • Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul

    Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul can never tell us anything except deception is possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 10:27:00 UTC

  • There are Lawgivers, Historians, and Scientists, in and then there are Prophets.

    There are Lawgivers, Historians, and Scientists, in and then there are Prophets. The former errs. The latter lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 09:32:00 UTC