https://propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/the-evolution-of-cooperation/PROPERTARIANISM: THE CORE
The Evolution of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-14 07:49:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/the-evolution-of-cooperation/PROPERTARIANISM: THE CORE
The Evolution of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-14 07:49:00 UTC
And that by insuring the allocations of property and relations and terms, allows the polity to survive and compete.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:41:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797917309692088320
Reply addressees: @ThisMachin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320
IN REPLY TO:
@ThisMachin
@curtdoolittle I am very familiar with Libertarian ideas about this . We can start conversation at a hight level. Or we can read Webster.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320
LAWS ARE DISCOVERED, LEGISLATION IS MADE. MAN CANNOT MAKE LAW.
Humans create commands, legislation, and regulations. Laws, both physical and natural (cooperation), we can only discover. We cannot any more create a law of cooperation (natural law) than we can a law of nature (physical laws). The only difference between physical laws and natural laws is that since we have memories, we can cooperate across time rather than be limited to the moment of the difference in potential.
(That might be hard to catch without pondering a bit.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 22:38:00 UTC
Why are lower prices of consumer goods more desirable than the employment of our less able, young, and older kin? Answer: They Aren’t.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:01:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122163908218880
Why are lower prices of consumer goods more desirable than the employment of our less able, young, and older kin? Answer: They Aren’t.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 12:01:00 UTC
Western Civilization is unique: sovereign, empirical, non-conflationary, consisting entirely of markets for info, assoc, mates, prod, rule.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 09:01:00 UTC
Actually, the majority of us were conquerors. Immigrants are free riders.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 06:49:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796605679595376640
Reply addressees: @mmlvia
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796550695667298304
IN REPLY TO:
@mmlvia
@curtdoolittle Stupidest argument I’ve heard. Every citizen has an equal right to vote. Besides, virtually all Americans are immigrants.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796550695667298304
We made a difference. All of us. Everyone who stayed on-message.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 09:36:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796285299068375040
Reply addressees: @Wasian_NRx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796261017701543936
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796261017701543936
—“The left seems to be doing everything in their power to make cooperation with them expensive and violence against them cheap.”—Ben B. Rodríguez
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 17:17:00 UTC
“DEMOCRACY HAS IT’S OWN CALCULATION PROBLEM”
(by Jeremie Makell)
—“Natural law informs how we choose to cooperate to establish and maintain sovereignty. Some backwoods libertine can stake a plot of land and proclaim himself sovereign, but that’s not sovereignty, that’s just LARPing.
Sovereignty requires that we cooperate to insure each others’ property from imposition. As we develop new technologies (bronze, iron, etc.) the complexity of our social institutions must evolve as well.
For every new advancement also creates more opportunity for parasitism and externalities that increase overall transaction costs while reducing trust. The more rigorous your institutions the more adaptable you are to inter-generational change.
This explains why China despite being an ancient civilization, had centuries of stagnation while the Europeans were innovators and drove forward industry.
Each of the markets that Curt lists (rule, commons, reproduction, production, etc.) become more prevalent and necessary the further civilization advances.
This is what I believe Curt means when he refers to DECIDABILITY: just as prices aid us in determining how to most efficiently buy and sell goods, the exchanges conducted voluntarily between markets under rule of law help us to determine how to most efficiently advance civilization.
Democracy fails to adapt to change because it has its own calculation problem.”– Jeremie Makell
(ed.: So perfect, so eloquent, I want to weep with joy. — Curt)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:49:00 UTC