Yeah.. this is right.
1) Physical Law (Laws of Nature)
2) Natural Law (Law of Cooperation)
3) Testimonial Law (Law of Information)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 19:31:00 UTC
Yeah.. this is right.
1) Physical Law (Laws of Nature)
2) Natural Law (Law of Cooperation)
3) Testimonial Law (Law of Information)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 19:31:00 UTC
if you submit to mysticism you have abandoned reason. if you abandon reason you are no longer capable of rational cooperation. if you are no longer capable of rational cooperation then you are not longer human.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 13:24:00 UTC
LAWS OF NATURE, NATURAL LAW, AND LAWS OF INFORMATION
1) Laws of nature (physical laws) and
2) Natural laws (laws of cooperation), and
3) Truth (laws of information)
consist of a spectrum dependent upon each other.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 11:09:00 UTC
We are supposed to love women and care for them. We are not supposed to debate with them over true or false. Only whether a want is possible for the two of us, or impossible for the two of us. Our education, commerce, and politics places too much emphasis on true or false or good or bad, and too little upon possible and impossible. Women are precious creatures if they are honest. There is no reason we must worry about good and true. Only possible and harmful. It does not matter if what they want is good or true, only whether it is possible and not harmful. We are happy to ask women not to ask us to think as women. But we too infrequently fail to reciprocate by not asking women to think as men. Women nest at home, seek signal status with their peers, and try to overload their children, and none of these three impulses have any limit other than her exhaustion. An exhaustion which she will transfer to you. So do not ask woment to be men and think of limits and efficiency. Just love them, and do what is possible. The suffering occurs when we engage in transfers and not exchanges. and the enemy of exchanges is lethargy caused by lack of fitness, and lack of will.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 09:46:00 UTC
eh… not true. Aristotle>Stoics>Romans>Scholastics>Locke/etc Principle = Min. Necessary for Peaceful Cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 19:59:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799341240152100868
Reply addressees: @BulgakovsPilot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799322683590766592
IN REPLY TO:
@BulgakovsPilot
@curtdoolittle Difficult to define.I’m curious as to why natural law lingers in poli thought despite it being non-existent pre-enlightenment
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799322683590766592
The limits of action and the limits of cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 18:39:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799321039830446080
Reply addressees: @BulgakovsPilot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799320473054154752
IN REPLY TO:
@BulgakovsPilot
@curtdoolittle Ok. I see the distinction, but what about it gives it the distinction of “natural”?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799320473054154752
Physical Laws of Nature, vs Natural Law of Cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 18:39:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799320972373397506
Reply addressees: @BulgakovsPilot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799320473054154752
IN REPLY TO:
@BulgakovsPilot
@curtdoolittle Ok. I see the distinction, but what about it gives it the distinction of “natural”?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799320473054154752
Or it’s reversal: the non-imposition of costs upon that which others have born costs to inventory.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 18:36:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799320316648554496
Reply addressees: @BulgakovsPilot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799319121326325760
IN REPLY TO:
@BulgakovsPilot
@curtdoolittle is the concept of natural rights even desirable?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799319121326325760
MORITZ BIERLING ON ‘THE ONLY SCALABLE SOLUTION’.
—“The Western peoples transferred, or rather limited, the universal drive to find and exploit high yield, low investment, low maintenance sources of energy from other people (“parasitism”) to immediately and personally moveable resources including your own body and everything it produces (“industry”). Turns out that’s the only scalable solution.”—Moritz Bierling
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 11:23:00 UTC
(hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question)—“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker