“Markets between nations states allow us to produce commons suitable to each group’s degree of neoteny and development.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 16:32:00 UTC
Theme: Commons
-
“Markets allow us to cooperate on means despite disparate ends. Democracy, only
“Markets allow us to cooperate on means despite disparate ends. Democracy, only on same ends. Democracy requires homogeneity.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 16:29:00 UTC
-
Democracy is limited to the choice of preference in commons among those of simil
Democracy is limited to the choice of preference in commons among those of similar interest given scarcity of resources.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 16:28:00 UTC
-
If it’s in the commons and it’s noticeable it’s a violation of the law. If it is
If it’s in the commons and it’s noticeable it’s a violation of the law. If it isn’t then it isn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 04:10:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049150049689722880
Reply addressees: @SaltwaterGroyp1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049143831310958593
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049143831310958593
-
Two different questions. As a matter of natural law,drugs that export any risk w
Two different questions. As a matter of natural law,drugs that export any risk whatsoever in the commons are violation of reciprocity. So it’s not drugs but behavior and crime. As the chinese found out,legalization doesn’t go the way you think it will. As for me, depends on drug.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 03:56:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049146462909714432
Reply addressees: @SaltwaterGroyp1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049143831310958593
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049143831310958593
-
Rule of Law forces markets in everything, because there is no other means of obt
Rule of Law forces markets in everything, because there is no other means of obtaining goods, services, information, and commons.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 03:41:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049142824220934146
-
Rule of Law forces markets in everything, because there is no other means of obt
Rule of Law forces markets in everything, because there is no other means of obtaining goods, services, information, and commons.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-07 23:41:00 UTC
-
There is no WE. There hasn’t been a ‘We’ since 1963. The only solution to demand
There is no WE. There hasn’t been a ‘We’ since 1963. The only solution to demand for mutually exclusive commons is devolution to the states, secession, or revolutionary dismantlement. STOP TRYING TO MAKE MONOPOLIES.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-07 21:13:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049045093657825280
Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein @Cernovich
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049031828189798400
IN REPLY TO:
@BretWeinstein
There is no clear way out of the tailspin we are clearly in. That means, that if there is an answer, it will be counter-intuitive. Inherently.
That also means that when one encounters an answer that sounds wrong, coming from someone who should know better, it might be important.Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049031828189798400
-
“And therein lies the trap. Those who can personally handle freedom and individu
—“And therein lies the trap. Those who can personally handle freedom and individual responsibility and user-pays-for-commons, assume everyone else is also capable of the agency required to exercise such freedoms.”— Howard Van Der Klauw
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 14:36:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048582675957780480
-
“And therein lies the trap. Those who can personally handle freedom and individu
—“And therein lies the trap. Those who can personally handle freedom and individual responsibility and user-pays-for-commons, too often assume everyone else is also capable of the agency required to exercise such freedoms.”— Howard Van Der Klauw
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 10:36:00 UTC