***The First Morality of Warfare: Genetic Pacification***
Ouch. I’m going to get flack for that one….
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-08 07:59:00 UTC
Theme: Coercion
-
***The First Morality of Warfare: Genetic Pacification*** Ouch. I’m going to get
-
#NRx So if man or woman will not take and adhere to the oath, and survive the te
#NRx So if man or woman will not take and adhere to the oath, and survive the test of adhering to it, we must shun or kill them
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 11:59:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673834134188498944
Reply addressees: @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673809450592034816
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Outsideness Physical Science as practiced is merely incomplete. Science is a moral discipline laundering imagination from free association.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/673809450592034816
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Outsideness Physical Science as practiced is merely incomplete. Science is a moral discipline laundering imagination from free association.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/673809450592034816
-
The Multitude of Luddisms We Call Political Philosophy – Our Failure to Scale
[I] am beginning to see Rothbardian Libertinism, if not Puritanism, Socialism and Communism, as intellectually limited failures of maturity. They’re all forms of Luddism. They are failures to innovate to adapt to changes in scale. Just as the 20th century thinkers failed to grasp the problem of existential possibility (operationalism and intuitionism) and of criticism over justification (morality and contract over science and truth), we failed to evolve government to adapt to the new scale. Worse, we were so temporarily rich in the west due to the invention of industrial revolution, that we could afford a century of folly. Markets in everything. There is no common good. There are only many theoretical goods waiting to be discovered, exploited, and abandoned in the face of newly invented goods.
-
The Multitude of Luddisms We Call Political Philosophy – Our Failure to Scale
[I] am beginning to see Rothbardian Libertinism, if not Puritanism, Socialism and Communism, as intellectually limited failures of maturity. They’re all forms of Luddism. They are failures to innovate to adapt to changes in scale. Just as the 20th century thinkers failed to grasp the problem of existential possibility (operationalism and intuitionism) and of criticism over justification (morality and contract over science and truth), we failed to evolve government to adapt to the new scale. Worse, we were so temporarily rich in the west due to the invention of industrial revolution, that we could afford a century of folly. Markets in everything. There is no common good. There are only many theoretical goods waiting to be discovered, exploited, and abandoned in the face of newly invented goods.
-
Getting corruption under control —“Stressed the importance of free enterprise
Getting corruption under control
—“Stressed the importance of free enterprise and admitted the excessive power of law enforcers.” Indeed, Putin did mention that in 2014, Russian law enforcement agencies investigated almost 200,000 business-related criminal cases, of which only 15 percent ended in convictions — yet 83 percent of businesspeople who were investigated lost their businesses. “That means they were pressured, expropriated and allowed to go,” Putin said. “That, of course, is not what we need in terms of business climate.”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 09:13:00 UTC
-
We are afraid infantilized progressives will hurt themselves with lawn darts. Bu
We are afraid infantilized progressives will hurt themselves with lawn darts. But they wouldn’t touch a ‘scary’ gun. See? Logical.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:49:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673197612011515905
Reply addressees: @Salon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/672762329424142336
IN REPLY TO:
@Salon
The Second Amendment must go: We ban lawn darts. It’s time to ban guns https://t.co/jpg4kIiaoP https://t.co/F6CGjMM6Wc
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/672762329424142336
-
Brilliant Idea. Big Empty City. Has it’s own port and waterway, can easily be wa
Brilliant Idea. Big Empty City. Has it’s own port and waterway, can easily be walled off into an enormous ghetto.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:36:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673194166646607872
Reply addressees: @Nationalist_UK
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673193281132617728
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673193281132617728
-
We outlawed lawn darts but not guns?–Salon —@Salon We are afraid infantilized
–We outlawed lawn darts but not guns?–Salon
—@Salon We are afraid infantilized progressives will hurt themselves with lawn darts. But they wouldn’t touch a ‘scary’ gun. See? Logical.—Curt
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:27:00 UTC
-
YOU DON’T TRY TO CREATE A COMMUNE IN AN ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED GEOGRAPHY, YO
YOU DON’T TRY TO CREATE A COMMUNE IN AN ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED GEOGRAPHY, YOU RAISE ARMS AND TAKE A COMMERCIAL CENTER – And then you starve the political sector to death.
The modern economy is NOT anti-fragile. Modernity is tragically fragile. Create 30 days of distruption in a modern economy and it will break. Create 90 days and people will be in the streets and starving.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 03:57:00 UTC
-
YES WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A CIVIL WAR. HOW DO I KNOW? BECAUSE I AM GOING TO START
YES WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A CIVIL WAR. HOW DO I KNOW? BECAUSE I AM GOING TO START IT.
Moral men merely need moral permission to take moral action.
1) A justification of moral authority: pervasive lying, theft, and genocide.
2) A set of demands for constitutional reformation.
3) A plan of transition to the new institutional order.
4) A means of raising the cost of the status quo such that meeting demands, nullification, secession, revolution, and civil war are equally probable outcomes.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 03:54:00 UTC