Theme: Coercion

  • The Second Great Criticism of Democracy

    (important)(very important) [Y]ou see, they taught us that the BALANCE OF POWER was what kept us safe from authoritarianism. But this is both false and immaterial. It distracted us from the reason for western institutional and cultural success. There are only three means of organizing man: force, gossip and exchange. We refer to these three means of organization as weapons of influence or methods of coercion. By constructing three houses: 1) aristocracy/military/law of property; 2) church/priesthood/law of family/insurance; 3) burgher/commerce/law of contract; …and requiring the at least tacit acceptance of the other two, each can specialize in the most rapid rate of invention in his means of organizing the polity for the construction of commons. So just as the market can conduct more and faster research into the construction of goods and services, the market for ORDER consisting of the three great specializations, can conduct more and faster research into the construction of commons – without the hindrance of the others. Only the knowledge of the interests of the others. In other words, not by APPROVAL but by DISSENT. Democracy reverses this evolutionary strategy requiring approval and ignoring dissent – and so democracy increases opportunity for parasitism and rent seeking in order to gain passage of every single piece of legislation. If we combine private property (anglo saxon/ aryan), common law (organic evolutionary law), high trust (aryan and christian), rule of law (aryan or at least anglo saxon) we then end up with a population that innovates in the suppression of parasitism and rent seeking almost as fast as it innovates in organization for any given production: private, commons, or family. Hoppe like others has solved the problem of the failure of incentives. I see that as the first analytic criticism of democracy. However, I feel that it is not a causal criticism but merely a consequential one. So in this SECOND criticism of democracy I put forth that the success of the west was not so much in small government as it was in the distribution of government (the production of commons) into specializations requiring survival of DISSENT by the competing houses rather than a monopoly requiring assent. In this analysis, democracy then is merely a sham: a scam by which a group seeks to monopolize powers of coercion in order to hold power by requiring assent rather than surviving dissent. Now, I for a moment let us look at the philosophy of science: in the sequence: {free association, hypothesis, theory, law, truth, tautology} we look for the truth that survives criticism (falsification). The search for truth is one of survival of criticism: dissent. It is not one of justification: assent. So this is also why democracies must engage in constant postmodern lying and propagandizing: because they must manufacture falsity in order to justify falsity. Conversely, aristocratic egalitarianism – the philosophy of the west – is one of survival of dissent. Or stated more simply, the method of organizing the west has be SCIENTIFIC. Which is why the west invented and used science in all walks of life. Because the civilization has practiced scientific action even in its most mystical eras. We can end this monotheistic monopolistic government by assent and restore our anglo-saxon scientific government: three (or more) houses each of which acts according to its interests but whose actions must survive dissent by a jury selected by lot of the constituency of the other houses. More as I continue my work. But I thought it prudent to make the Second Great Criticism of Democracy its own subject of discussion. The second great criticism then is that it is an intentionally unscientific method of government inferior to that form of government which was responsibile for our success.

  • “It took 22 mil Northerners 4 yrs of the bloodiest warfare in American history t

    —“It took 22 mil Northerners 4 yrs of the bloodiest warfare in American history to subdue 5 million Southerners.”—Bloody Bill


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-30 09:52:00 UTC

  • Western man does not like taxes, because he is a moral man, and wants to prevent

    Western man does not like taxes, because he is a moral man, and wants to prevent ill use of them – do no harm. Cosmopolitan man does not like taxes because he is an immoral man and wants to privatize them – do no good.

    (ouch)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-30 05:09:00 UTC

  • Prison is insufficiently objectionable and a stigma. But terribly effective at c

    Prison is insufficiently objectionable and a stigma. But terribly effective at containing young males.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-29 08:19:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670879642803400704

    Reply addressees: @ShadFloss @HenkPoley @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670807043142508544


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ShadFloss

    @HenkPoley @curtdoolittle @conradhackett but we know mass incarceration is a direct result of legislation particularly from the 80s and 90s

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670807043142508544

  • mass incarceration was a response to lax incarceration of prior decades. Great s

    mass incarceration was a response to lax incarceration of prior decades. Great society movement.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-29 08:13:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670878155398365184

    Reply addressees: @ShadFloss @HenkPoley @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670807043142508544


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ShadFloss

    @HenkPoley @curtdoolittle @conradhackett but we know mass incarceration is a direct result of legislation particularly from the 80s and 90s

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670807043142508544

  • MEASURES FOR REMOVING ISLAM FROM BRITAIN AND THE WEST (wow Vigorously prosecute

    http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6208-how-should-we-remove-islam-from-britain-and-the-westSUGGESTED MEASURES FOR REMOVING ISLAM FROM BRITAIN AND THE WEST

    (wow http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6208-how-should-we-remove-islam-from-britain-and-the-west)

    Vigorously prosecute all those involved in polygamy, forced marriage, honour violence or female genital mutilation.

    Reintroduce sedition laws (where repealed) and prosecute all transgressors and enablers.

    Legislate British/ Western culture and value sets as dominant.

    Prohibit all manifestations of sharia law and all dissemination and advocacy of sharia law.

    Abolish sharia courts where they exist.

    Remove charitable status from mosques and other Muslim money-raising institutions.

    Remove all restrictions on freedom of speech except for incitement to violence; repeal all hate speech laws.

    Stop all further immigration, including immigration based on family reunification.

    Muslims may privately owe their religious loyalty to Islam, however they must publicly declare their civic loyalty to their country of citizenship.

    Ban the public call to prayer.

    Disperse groups praying in the street or other public places.

    Deport all foreign-born convicted terrorists, regardless of human rights legislation.

    Former and new immigrants must sign a Pledge of Allegiance to a stated set of values, under threat of losing their citizenship/ immigrant status and being deported for breaking the pledge.

    Naturalised citizens who have violated the criminal code will be de-naturalised and deported.

    Reclaim universities, schools, churches, the media, local councils, the civil service and the professions. This requires an ideological purge, in which advocates of anti-Western and pro-Islam ideologies are removed from their posts in educational, cultural and media institutions.

    Institute a counter-multiculturalism ideology in the schools and society, teaching the people that multiculturalism is an ideology aimed at dismantling our culture.

    Repeal all laws, programmes, and policies that advance group rights and multiculturalism. Everyone is equal under the law and there is no basis for making some more equal than others based on their skin colour or religion.

    Discard the history books which describe our culture and civilisation as one of genocide and oppression. Rebuild the national identities of our children via the teaching of unbiased truth thus allowing them possession of a cultural heritage without shame.

    Promote each Western country’s national language as the language of government and require immigrants to learn it within a given time period.

    Encourage family values and child-rearing to reverse our demographic decline.

    Prohibit foreign countries from financing, investing in and contributing to all religious, cultural and educational institutions.

    Outlaw shariah-compliant financial instruments.

    Outlaw Islamic state ownership of sensitive Western assets such as stock exchanges, ports, security firms, defence contractors and such.

    Declare that Islam is incompatible with 21st century, secular, liberal democracy.

    Monitor mosques for content and close mosques found to be promoting terrorism, sedition or homophobic violence.

    Stop the building of any new mosques funded by foreign states.

    Remove local government funding for all radical Muslim organisations and associations in the public sphere.

    Expel all foreign-born imams.

    Legislate to ensure all domestic imams speak the native language within the mosque.

    Obtain reciprocity from all Islamic countries with respect to existing foreign-funded mosques in each country (i.e., for existing mosques to remain open, demand the right for equivalent numbers of churches/ synagogues in respective countries).

    Obtain reciprocal rights to proselytise in each Islamic trading country.

    Obtain reciprocal rights for foreigners visiting Islamic countries including freedoms related to dress codes, food and liquor consumption, property ownership, right to worship and others.

    Confiscate all Western-held funds for Islamic states that finance terrorism and promote sharia in the West.

    Limit child benefit to a maximum of two children.

    Make tax evasion and benefit fraud deportable offences.

    Since one eighth of zakat goes to jihad make it illegal or at the very least remove its charitable status.

    Regularly inspect takeaways and curry houses for environmental health and safety and immigration status of employees.

    Taxi drivers as part of licensing process to be CRB checked and refused licence if found to have a criminal record. DNA sample to be taken at application as they often use brothers/ cousins.

    No use of translators or signs in foreign languages.

    Set up tax task force to tackle tax fraud of businesses paid in cash, and a special database to tackle insurance fraud.

    Set up money laundering task force.

    Seizure of family assets for not informing authorities of jihadis in family.

    Reform Council Tax to better represent numbers of adults in family accommodation, e.g., a 25% surcharge for every adult over 18 where more than 2 in a house.

    All streets and buildings with Islamic names to be renamed.

    Money transfers to Islamic countries to be vetted/ taxed and provable as being from legitimate source, otherwise seized.

    Make harbouring or employment of illegal immigrants a deportable offence and/ or subject to confiscation of assets.

    Any GP providing false information on medical certificates for insurance claims or to prevent deportation to be struck off GMC.

    Abolish the Equality and Human Rights Commission

    Make it illegal to marry cousins and deport any immigrant who does so.

    End ‘positive discrimination’ in employment etc.

    Increase costs of soft courses such as Islamic studies/ cultural studies/ media studies and use the money to subsidise hard sciences, technology, engineering etc.

    HM Revenue & Customs to investigate and link in with Land Registry for tax fraud from non-disclosed rental income.

    Council houses to be allocated not on basis of need but on local roots and time spent on waiting list.

    Cash inducements for voluntary repatriation.

    Immigrant rapists to be deported.

    Disbar Muslims from employment at airports and other security sensitive installations.

    Support India in combating jihad.

    Put legal height restriction on mosques; minarets above this height to be reduced.

    No further mosques to be built.

    Any Muslim going abroad on jihad should not be allowed back into the country.

    Friends, relatives and associates of Muslims found guilty of spreading sedition etc. to be investigated. If there is reasonable suspicion that they knew about the activity of the guilty person and did not inform the authorities, then they too should be deported.

    Shut down Muslim-only prayer rooms in public spaces (universities, airports, hospitals etc.).

    Withdraw the right to citizenship through birth (perhaps make it dependent on at least one grandparent born in the UK).

    End dual citizenship.

    Close down mosques and Muslim facilities in prisons.

    Keep Muslim prisoners separate from others.

    Ban halal slaughter/ meat.

    Ban the burka/ niqab.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-28 16:45:00 UTC

  • I have no problem defending or ruling other peoples. These are both moral and co

    I have no problem defending or ruling other peoples. These are both moral and costly.

    I have a problem with governing other people. And profiting from it.

    Why?

    Because defense and rule of law are universal truths. Governing: producing commons, are preferences and strategies.

    I consider that none of even the most enlightened people’s business. And worse, beyond their capacity.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-27 19:00:00 UTC

  • Talking to V the other day about how much damage the IRS did to our lives. I am

    Talking to V the other day about how much damage the IRS did to our lives.

    I am not sure which was worse. The cancer or my own government.

    That reason alone – knowing how much evil is done by those people, I have no compunction at all about killing every member of every family that works for any our of control bureaucracy free of juridical defence.

    When you realise that they print vast sums of money, and that all their prosecution would not pay for a few days if the Iraq war you begin to see the evil that these people do.

    I want every one of them dead.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-27 18:34:00 UTC

  • “A VAT is insidious as it taxes all levels of production and allows the governme

    —“A VAT is insidious as it taxes all levels of production and allows the government to extract many more funds from the public and then it brings about higher prices, lower production, lower incomes, and yet the creators of it totally escape blame.”— Justin Ptak


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-27 10:29:00 UTC

  • We are gong to do a lot of killing. It’s a good thing. If it lies, kill it. If i

    We are gong to do a lot of killing.

    It’s a good thing.

    If it lies, kill it.

    If it’s used to teach lies: burn it.

    If it tries to resist, kill it too.

    Rope. Guillotine. Pole. Cross. Pyre.

    Time for a thorough cleansing.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-27 07:05:00 UTC