[R]othbard “appropriated” the term “libertarianism” and instead gave us anarcho capitalism as the reinterpretation of cosmopolitan ethics of the eastern european borderlands, under Russian, Lithuanian, and Polish rule. It is the ethic of the ghetto. Of the people who do not produce commons or defense. There is nothing ‘libertarian’ in Rothbarianism, and nothing moral in his or Block’s attempt to construct moral and legal rules. The word “is” remains extremely confusing for english speakers, since it refers both to “exists as”, and can be used as a shortcut for AVOIDING or CONFLATING, or DECEIVING the method by which something exists. So I prefer to state libertarianism as the reciprocal insurance of all individuals in a polity against the undesired imposition of costs upon that which has been transformed at the cost of individual actions or inactions – whether that cost be imposed by an individual(violence, theft, fraud, externality) a group of individuals (conspiracy), or an organization devoted to the construction of commons (government). Liberty can only be constructed by this means: mutual insurance against the involuntary imposition of costs. There is no free lunch. And arguments in favor of ‘belief’ in liberty, or belief that we should leave one another alone, are merely fraudulent attempts to obtain the experience of liberty without paying the very high cost of both insuring one another against impositions of costs, and the high cost of refraining from imposing costs upon others, and the high cost of creating commons that produce disproportionate returns, including the commons of Liberty itself. And as empirical evidence we should note that the cosmopolitans lost eastern Europe just as their ancestors lost Spain and Jerusalem. There are no free rides. Liberty is rare because it is expensive. And because only a militia of warriors possesses the incentive to construct it. But the returns on the high trust society warrant it. Because westerners dragged man out of ignorance, mysticism, disease, and poverty in the ancient and modern worlds because of it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine SOURCE http://ex-army.blogspot.com/…/running-libertarianism-into-g…? AND ORIGINAL POST http://www.everyjoe.com/…/pol…/why-im-no-longer-libertarian/
Theme: Coercion
-
Running Rothbardian Libertinism Into the Ground
[R]othbard “appropriated” the term “libertarianism” and instead gave us anarcho capitalism as the reinterpretation of cosmopolitan ethics of the eastern european borderlands, under Russian, Lithuanian, and Polish rule. It is the ethic of the ghetto. Of the people who do not produce commons or defense. There is nothing ‘libertarian’ in Rothbarianism, and nothing moral in his or Block’s attempt to construct moral and legal rules. The word “is” remains extremely confusing for english speakers, since it refers both to “exists as”, and can be used as a shortcut for AVOIDING or CONFLATING, or DECEIVING the method by which something exists. So I prefer to state libertarianism as the reciprocal insurance of all individuals in a polity against the undesired imposition of costs upon that which has been transformed at the cost of individual actions or inactions – whether that cost be imposed by an individual(violence, theft, fraud, externality) a group of individuals (conspiracy), or an organization devoted to the construction of commons (government). Liberty can only be constructed by this means: mutual insurance against the involuntary imposition of costs. There is no free lunch. And arguments in favor of ‘belief’ in liberty, or belief that we should leave one another alone, are merely fraudulent attempts to obtain the experience of liberty without paying the very high cost of both insuring one another against impositions of costs, and the high cost of refraining from imposing costs upon others, and the high cost of creating commons that produce disproportionate returns, including the commons of Liberty itself. And as empirical evidence we should note that the cosmopolitans lost eastern Europe just as their ancestors lost Spain and Jerusalem. There are no free rides. Liberty is rare because it is expensive. And because only a militia of warriors possesses the incentive to construct it. But the returns on the high trust society warrant it. Because westerners dragged man out of ignorance, mysticism, disease, and poverty in the ancient and modern worlds because of it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine SOURCE http://ex-army.blogspot.com/…/running-libertarianism-into-g…? AND ORIGINAL POST http://www.everyjoe.com/…/pol…/why-im-no-longer-libertarian/
-
ON VIOLENCE AND SOCIAL ORDERS (via a friend)
http://www.amazon.com/Violence-Social-Orders-Conceptual-Interpreting/dp/1107646995/NORTH ON VIOLENCE AND SOCIAL ORDERS
(via a friend)
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-17 01:25:00 UTC
-
REFUTING IMMORAL ATTACKS ON PROPERTARIANISM. Why would you unless you either don
REFUTING IMMORAL ATTACKS ON PROPERTARIANISM.
Why would you unless you either don’t understand it, are immoral, or both.
–“What, you trying to make the argument that a minority prescription cannot produce a revolution?
Or that a majority is needed to force political change?
Or that treating information as s commons such that truthful speech is required just as we have done in courts to limit religious speech?
Or that it would be better to continue to permit pseudoscience and propaganda and deceit than to constrain it?
Or that houses where we conducted truthful exchanges in the production of commons would not be better than corporatism, special interests, class warfare, race warfare, party warfare, fed by media complicit in propaganda?
I have spent a lot of my life in these subjects and I am all too well aware of the power of so called “scribblers” to reorder human thinking.
The question I have for anyone that criticises these ambitions is why they prefer pseudoscience to science, obscurantism to philosophy, propaganda to information, deceit to truthfulness.
There is no safe answer with which one can retort. Especially since the evidence of transformation of polities to greater correspondence (truth) is now overwhelming in every era.
So if you don’t like me or my arguments you are welcome to attempt to refute them.
But constant offers if opinion and a failure to construct argument are just pissing in fire hydrants.
Basically you are forcing a cost of refutation upon me by shaming rather than engaging in the pursuit of truth.
First, this violates the principle of cooperation under which it is rational to forgo predation in favour of cooperation.
Second it is a rather obvious tactic. And the question it presents us with is why are you motivated to preserve lying, shaming, rallying which is merely the postmodern equivalent is saying its unchristian and a violation of gods will.
There is no more substance to your statements than this.
So if we focus the lens in your incentives and abilities, then why is it that you as one who imposes costs upon others rather than seeking the truth, and imposes those costs though fraudulent methods of criticism, and who seeks to preserve the institutional tolerance for the forms of fraud that you employ … Why is it that you feel your pseudo rational non empirical, truth preventing, arguments should be more tolerable in politics than their rationalist and supernatural predecessors?
Why are you so afraid of truth and voluntary exchange? Why are you so immoral that you will impose costs by fraud upon others?
In other words, why are you demonstrably an immoral person?
Except to perpetuate immorality?
Truth built the west. Truth can restore it.
(A couple of middle class guys hanging around Paris nearly overthrew the world.)
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-16 11:42:00 UTC
-
THE TRUTH —The Truth was enough to create the west, and it is enough to restor
THE TRUTH
—The Truth was enough to create the west, and it is enough to restore the west. But we must suppress the liars as we have murder, violence, theft, and fraud. That is because like air, land, and sea, information is a precious commons that cannot tolerate pollution if truth is to survive.—
Punish the wicked. We require truth. If requiring fails, what follows is bloody constraint: hand, fist and boot, whip, noose, cross, fire, impale.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 01:54:00 UTC
-
Never Bend At The Knee Involuntarily – Ever
—“The thing I hate about cops is it really grates having to bend the knee to those who are, by most measures, my inferiors.”—- Eli Harman
[Y]eah. I’ve actually taken to using “Who do you think you’re talking to soldier?” in a demanding paternal voice to anyone in uniform. Strange how well it works. And in public I’m testing “I am a gentleman, and you will treat me as such.” This leaves the implied ‘or else’. And in groups “I am aristocracy. And I will tolerate this behavior.” Always good to let the little people know who is in charge. Works much better when you’re over 50. But I didn’t realize how often I was doing it when I was younger. Authority is an air. It is not cultivated so much as constructed. Not contrived so much as instinct. Not learned so much as practiced. The world needs us. When we abandon our paternalism we leave the lesser people to the victimization of the lower life forms. **Every man a noble, every man a judge, every man a sheriff, every man a warrior, every man a craftsman.** ***It is through individual intolerance for barbarism that we build our great civilization.*** One of my first oaths is: “Aristocracy May Not Be Bound”.
–I agree to the one law, the moral law of property. I do not agree to any other. And any man who binds me shall die by my hand or the hand of my brothers. And I swear to all my brothers that any man who binds my brother shall die by my hand or the hand of my brothers.—
This is an modern version of the initiatic brotherhood of soldiers – which appears to be older than our memories, but no less than 3500 years old.
-
Never Bend At The Knee Involuntarily – Ever
—“The thing I hate about cops is it really grates having to bend the knee to those who are, by most measures, my inferiors.”—- Eli Harman
[Y]eah. I’ve actually taken to using “Who do you think you’re talking to soldier?” in a demanding paternal voice to anyone in uniform. Strange how well it works. And in public I’m testing “I am a gentleman, and you will treat me as such.” This leaves the implied ‘or else’. And in groups “I am aristocracy. And I will tolerate this behavior.” Always good to let the little people know who is in charge. Works much better when you’re over 50. But I didn’t realize how often I was doing it when I was younger. Authority is an air. It is not cultivated so much as constructed. Not contrived so much as instinct. Not learned so much as practiced. The world needs us. When we abandon our paternalism we leave the lesser people to the victimization of the lower life forms. **Every man a noble, every man a judge, every man a sheriff, every man a warrior, every man a craftsman.** ***It is through individual intolerance for barbarism that we build our great civilization.*** One of my first oaths is: “Aristocracy May Not Be Bound”.
–I agree to the one law, the moral law of property. I do not agree to any other. And any man who binds me shall die by my hand or the hand of my brothers. And I swear to all my brothers that any man who binds my brother shall die by my hand or the hand of my brothers.—
This is an modern version of the initiatic brotherhood of soldiers – which appears to be older than our memories, but no less than 3500 years old.
-
Monopoly Government vs Market Militia
(important)(profound) [T]he monopoly of government versus the market and militia. When there is government the responsibility is ‘theirs’. When there is militia the responsibility is ‘ours’. Where there is rule of law, there is scientific rule. Where there is a market for commons, there is a civic society. Where there is a market for goods and services there is productivity Where there is a market for reproduction there is eugenic reproduction. The people who create change in favor of excellence. THE MARKET SOCIETY Miltia: Market Warfare Judiciary: Market Jurisprudence Houses: Market Government Property: Market Productivity Monogamy: Market Reproduction Market = Meritocracy = Aristocracy And that is the difference between the river valley civilizations (them) and the sea civilizations (us).
-
Monopoly Government vs Market Militia
(important)(profound) [T]he monopoly of government versus the market and militia. When there is government the responsibility is ‘theirs’. When there is militia the responsibility is ‘ours’. Where there is rule of law, there is scientific rule. Where there is a market for commons, there is a civic society. Where there is a market for goods and services there is productivity Where there is a market for reproduction there is eugenic reproduction. The people who create change in favor of excellence. THE MARKET SOCIETY Miltia: Market Warfare Judiciary: Market Jurisprudence Houses: Market Government Property: Market Productivity Monogamy: Market Reproduction Market = Meritocracy = Aristocracy And that is the difference between the river valley civilizations (them) and the sea civilizations (us).
-
GOVERNMENT and MONOPOLY VS MILITIA and MARKET (important)(profound) When there i
GOVERNMENT and MONOPOLY VS MILITIA and MARKET
(important)(profound)
When there is government the responsibility is ‘theirs’.
When there is militia the responsibility is ‘ours’.
Where there is rule of law, there is scientific rule.
Where there is a market for commons, there is a civic society.
Where there is a market for goods and services there is productivity
Where there is a market for reproduction there is eugenic reproduction.
The people who create change in favor of excellence.
THE MARKET SOCIETY
Miltia: Market Warfare
Judiciary: Market Jurisprudence
Houses: Market Government
Property: Market Productivity
Monogamy: Market Reproduction
Market = Meritocracy = Aristocracy
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 04:54:00 UTC