Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24294454_10155930822637264_5103

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24294454_10155930822637264_5103

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24294454_10155930822637264_5103468180485574376_n_10155930822637264.jpg MAKAROV

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 11:04:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24301061_10155930822287264_5538

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24301061_10155930822287264_5538

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24301061_10155930822287264_553808975057429854_n_10155930822287264.jpg HKP4

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 11:04:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24232266_10155928813837264_62506939

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24232266_10155928813837264_62506939

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24232266_10155928813837264_625069397404399607_n_10155928813837264.jpg DOING MY PART: RECIPROCITY OR WAR.Al FreemanWe are beyond reciprocity with these folks. It is too late for that.Dec 02, 2017 4:33pmKaleb ParisGoddamn right.Dec 02, 2017 4:59pmVincent PicciottiWho that

    I feel like I recognize herDec 02, 2017 5:25pmBrad LehmanKate SteinleDec 02, 2017 6:28pmWilliam L. BengeWhy do we all know if a male citizen had been the carrier of an “illegal firearm” in SF that discharged and killed an innocent woman, for him the verdict would be guilty on all counts? Wackoland is devoid of common sense.Dec 02, 2017 6:47pmLee TuckerWelcome to Wackoland Jackoland…California is a weird place. I was in Pacific Height on Billionaires Row last month admiring how perfect it was, then I walked 20 minutes south and felt physically threatened for my safety. GOD BLESS MURICADec 02, 2017 7:06pmFrank LovellAlas, I don’t think there is a city in America (nor for that matter in the whole World) where that experience cannot possibly be had. I could be wrong (I HOPE I AM wrong!), please let me know if indeed I am wrong about that…Dec 02, 2017 7:39pmTim SwinfordThe slap on the wrist

    Verdict

    Will help reelect Trump

    I hopeDec 02, 2017 9:52pmEly HarmanReciprocate war?Dec 02, 2017 10:51pmCurt DoolittleyepDec 02, 2017 10:52pmDarren O’ConnorDec 02, 2017 11:47pmCarmen Princeat first I thought Curt was bragging about boinking herDec 03, 2017 1:23amCarmen PrinceI’m really tactless excuse meDec 03, 2017 1:23amDOING MY PART: RECIPROCITY OR WAR.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 16:11:00 UTC

  • The Experiment With Monopoly Economies Has Failed

    Not that I want to degrade one of my heroes (Spengler), but he is a German and Germans, including even so great a thinker as Weber, do not write about human orders with any degree of scientific constraint – they desire the recreation of the church in secular prose. You are better reading italians than germans. That said, in the current vernacular, in operational language, socialism refers to central control of the means of production, and central distribution of proceeds of production, with disputes settled by discretionary bureaucracy. This in opposition to capitalism, with distributed control of the means of production and distributed proceeds from production, with disputes solved under common law of torts (competition). An empirical analysis is that all peoples swing between central control and private control depending upon what is possible for them given their resources, demographics, degree of development, degree of normative development, and available institutions. As far as I know, the debate is over, and the findings of the 20th century are that small homogenous highly capitalist, but highly redistributive states produce the quality of life most demonstrably preferred by peoples. And that going forward we will produce states along some spectrum of centralized (low trust) to distributed (high trust), with mixed economies. and that it is most likely in my opinion that progress if tehre is any, will be toward layered economies with socialism at the bottom and capitalism in the middle, and aristocracy at the top. which is, as far as I know, a restoration of the historical pattern of cooperation. The experiment with monopoly economies has failed.

  • The Experiment With Monopoly Economies Has Failed

    Not that I want to degrade one of my heroes (Spengler), but he is a German and Germans, including even so great a thinker as Weber, do not write about human orders with any degree of scientific constraint – they desire the recreation of the church in secular prose. You are better reading italians than germans. That said, in the current vernacular, in operational language, socialism refers to central control of the means of production, and central distribution of proceeds of production, with disputes settled by discretionary bureaucracy. This in opposition to capitalism, with distributed control of the means of production and distributed proceeds from production, with disputes solved under common law of torts (competition). An empirical analysis is that all peoples swing between central control and private control depending upon what is possible for them given their resources, demographics, degree of development, degree of normative development, and available institutions. As far as I know, the debate is over, and the findings of the 20th century are that small homogenous highly capitalist, but highly redistributive states produce the quality of life most demonstrably preferred by peoples. And that going forward we will produce states along some spectrum of centralized (low trust) to distributed (high trust), with mixed economies. and that it is most likely in my opinion that progress if tehre is any, will be toward layered economies with socialism at the bottom and capitalism in the middle, and aristocracy at the top. which is, as far as I know, a restoration of the historical pattern of cooperation. The experiment with monopoly economies has failed.

  • THE EXPERIMENT WITH MONOPOLY ECONOMIES HAS FAILED Not that I want to degrade one

    THE EXPERIMENT WITH MONOPOLY ECONOMIES HAS FAILED

    Not that I want to degrade one of my heroes (Spengler), but he is a German and Germans, including even so great a thinker as Weber, do not write about human orders with any degree of scientific constraint – they desire the recreation of the church in secular prose. You are better reading italians than germans.

    That said, in the current vernacular, in operational language, socialism refers to central control of the means of production, and central distribution of proceeds of production, with disputes settled by discretionary bureaucracy. This in opposition to capitalism, with distributed control of the means of production and distributed proceeds from production, with disputes solved under common law of torts (competition).

    An empirical analysis is that all peoples swing between central control and private control depending upon what is possible for them given their resources, demographics, degree of development, degree of normative development, and available institutions.

    As far as I know, the debate is over, and the findings of the 20th century are that small homogenous highly capitalist, but highly redistributive states produce the quality of life most demonstrably preferred by peoples. And that going forward we will produce states along some spectrum of centralized (low trust) to distributed (high trust), with mixed economies. and that it is most likely in my opinion that progress if tehre is any, will be toward layered economies with socialism at the bottom and capitalism in the middle, and aristocracy at the top. which is, as far as I know, a restoration of the historical pattern of cooperation.

    The experiment with monopoly economies has failed.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 00:25:00 UTC

  • “The traditional, historical, fetters, (legal and social sanctions) placed upon

    “The traditional, historical, fetters, (legal and social sanctions) placed upon feminine coercion (rallying, shaming, nagging, scolding, gossip, mockery and ridicule) have been abolished and placed, instead, on masculine coercion (violence.) The effects are still working themselves out, but one is a persistent tendency towards feminization of all institutions as women use feminine coercion to gain entry to and then begin incrementally subordinating institutions to their whims, imperatives, and sensibilities, so far, without effective counter or check. These changes, I believe, precede the onset of large scale hormonal and dietary disruptions.”- Ely Harman

  • “The traditional, historical, fetters, (legal and social sanctions) placed upon

    “The traditional, historical, fetters, (legal and social sanctions) placed upon feminine coercion (rallying, shaming, nagging, scolding, gossip, mockery and ridicule) have been abolished and placed, instead, on masculine coercion (violence.) The effects are still working themselves out, but one is a persistent tendency towards feminization of all institutions as women use feminine coercion to gain entry to and then begin incrementally subordinating institutions to their whims, imperatives, and sensibilities, so far, without effective counter or check. These changes, I believe, precede the onset of large scale hormonal and dietary disruptions.”- Ely Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-01 16:23:00 UTC

  • “The traditional, historical, fetters, (legal and social sanctions) placed upon

    “The traditional, historical, fetters, (legal and social sanctions) placed upon feminine coercion (rallying, shaming, nagging, scolding, gossip, mockery and ridicule) have been abolished and placed, instead, on masculine coercion (violence.) The effects are still working themselves out, but one is a persistent tendency towards feminization of all institutions as women use feminine coercion to gain entry to and then begin incrementally subordinating institutions to their whims, imperatives, and sensibilities, so far, without effective counter or check. These changes, I believe, precede the onset of large scale hormonal and dietary disruptions.”- Ely Harman

  • It wasn’t so long ago that it was illegal to refuse your wife sex

    It wasn’t so long ago that it was illegal to refuse your wife sex.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-01 12:05:00 UTC