Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • Can We Argue That Improving Dispensation Of Social Justice And Social Equity Has A Positive Linear Relationship With The Ability Of A Society To Participate And Benefit From A Free Market?

    PAINFUL TRUTH

    You can’t define Social Justice, and you probably can’t define Social Equity, or describe how either could come about. And if you did, you would of necessity define injustice and inequity.

    However;

    You can desire that your genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political ‘status’ relative to others is more or less visible, and that you are more or less treated independent of that status by others. (Signaling or ‘Association and Cooperation’.)

    You can desire that you are not ignored, dismissed, outcast, or treated according to your reproductive value to others. (Genetic)

    You can desire that you are not avoided, ignored, dismissed, outcast or treated according to your behavior which is determined by your genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political value to others.(Behavioral)

    You can desire that you are not prohibited from use of commons, regardless of your genetic, behavioral, social, economic and political value to others. (Social)

    You can desire that you are given dividends via taxation to compensate for your lower genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political value to others. (Economic)

    You can desire that you are given political influence over the production of commons to compensate for your lower genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political value to others. (Political)

    So you can desire many false (non-market) forms of compensation from others, or you can reap many true (market) forms of compensation from others.

    So far as I know (and we know, and we can demonstrate) you require:
    1) rule of law that protects property rights (self, spouse, kin, investments, assets, property) from involuntary transfer (we call this tort, common, or natural law) regardless of you genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political value to others.
    2) A military, police, sheriff, and judiciary that will not violate that rule of law, but enforce it regardless of you genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political value to others.
    3) A bureaucracy that acts according to rule of law and accepts no payment, advantage, or influence, to bias their decisions, and treats all individuals identically regardless of their genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political value to others.

    And the reason to make use of MARKETS, is because they produce greater wealth than all possible alternatives, and as such, provide us with means of providing the luxury of law, enforcement, and bureaucracy, and market, treating you as equally as your willingness to demonstrate market-normative behavior warrants, despite your genetic, behavioral, social, economic, and political value to others.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    https://www.quora.com/Can-we-argue-that-improving-dispensation-of-social-justice-and-social-equity-has-a-positive-linear-relationship-with-the-ability-of-a-society-to-participate-and-benefit-from-a-free-market

  • I Plan Entirely Upon The Templar Strategy.

    Violence, Banking, Education.

  • I PLAN ENTIRELY UPON THE TEMPLAR STRATEGY. Violence, Banking, Education

    I PLAN ENTIRELY UPON THE TEMPLAR STRATEGY.

    Violence, Banking, Education.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-09 13:49:00 UTC

  • I Plan Entirely Upon The Templar Strategy.

    Violence, Banking, Education.

  • Gay? Che Guevara would have sent you to a concentration camp

    Gay? Che Guevara would have sent you to a concentration camp.

  • Gay? Che Guevara would have sent you to a concentration camp

    Gay? Che Guevara would have sent you to a concentration camp.

  • Then have at it. War is heaven

    Then have at it. War is heaven.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-08 14:47:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/939144502610157568

    Reply addressees: @BillyofTheWorld

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/939144105623543809

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/939144105623543809

  • But like raiding, piracy, viking, exploring, this process remained entrepreneuri

    But like raiding, piracy, viking, exploring, this process remained entrepreneurial. And the battle tactics (Ooda Loops) which remain the west’s tactics today, (maneuver, and combined arms), required adherence to contract (loyalty) to the plans, even if that put one at risk.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-07 18:39:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938840349648343041

    Reply addressees: @SmashMarxCult

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938737227831611392

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938737227831611392

  • If In The Near Future India, China, And Russia Unites Together, How Long Would It Take Them To Defeat The U.s. And U.k. Together?

    Russia can defeat any army in the world on land as long as they can do it quickly. But russia is a very poor country with a fairly small population, and vast territories.

    China is and will always be easy to starve to death with nothing more than normal submarines. They know this. Which is why they have ‘stolen’ the south china sea: strategic necessity. China’s only options are economic and nuclear. She may eventually win dominance by economic means, since her market is a monopoly, while the western civilization’s market is fragmented into many pieces. However, if the western civilization’s market united into a monopoly china would return to practical weakness. Remember china remains, and will remain, for a very long time, a poor country per person. It is kind of hard to imagine india and america going to war, we have no reason to. It is more likely that india and china will go to war and india will depend on america.

    The threat to america is the unification of germany, eastern europe, and russia, against the united states.

    Frankly, as an american, I would prefer that outcome, and that we could have our own national government instead of running an empire at the expense of our peoples.

    https://www.quora.com/If-in-the-near-future-India-China-and-Russia-unites-together-how-long-would-it-take-them-to-defeat-the-U-S-and-U-K-together

  • If In The Near Future India, China, And Russia Unites Together, How Long Would It Take Them To Defeat The U.s. And U.k. Together?

    Russia can defeat any army in the world on land as long as they can do it quickly. But russia is a very poor country with a fairly small population, and vast territories.

    China is and will always be easy to starve to death with nothing more than normal submarines. They know this. Which is why they have ‘stolen’ the south china sea: strategic necessity. China’s only options are economic and nuclear. She may eventually win dominance by economic means, since her market is a monopoly, while the western civilization’s market is fragmented into many pieces. However, if the western civilization’s market united into a monopoly china would return to practical weakness. Remember china remains, and will remain, for a very long time, a poor country per person. It is kind of hard to imagine india and america going to war, we have no reason to. It is more likely that india and china will go to war and india will depend on america.

    The threat to america is the unification of germany, eastern europe, and russia, against the united states.

    Frankly, as an american, I would prefer that outcome, and that we could have our own national government instead of running an empire at the expense of our peoples.

    https://www.quora.com/If-in-the-near-future-India-China-and-Russia-unites-together-how-long-would-it-take-them-to-defeat-the-U-S-and-U-K-together